Go back
One tiny win: Bannon GUILTY

One tiny win: Bannon GUILTY

Debates


@mott-the-hoople said
better wait till the appeal process is over
Indeed.

https://en-volve.com/2022/07/23/violation-dershowitz-says-blatantly-unconstitutional-bannon-conviction-very-likely-to-be-overturned/


It is rather simple isn’t it?
Was Bannon summoned to a hearing?

Yes. Yes he was.

Did Bannon turn up at that said hearing?

No. No he didn’t.

What was Bannon charged with? Ahhh. Yes.

So guilty.

It’s really not rocket science.


@shavixmir
Yeah, SO unconstitutional to be called before a constitutional based hearing. THE BASTURDS, how can they do such an awful thing as to actually call witnesses?


@sonhouse said
@shavixmir
Yeah, SO unconstitutional to be called before a constitutional based hearing. THE BASTURDS, how can they do such an awful thing as to actually call witnesses?
It is unbelievable. I agree.
Who the hell can a democratic government do democratic things? Who can a judicial system to justicy things?

Best left to the lads on the trailer parks. They certainly know best.


@shavixmir said
It is rather simple isn’t it?
Was Bannon summoned to a hearing?

Yes. Yes he was.

Did Bannon turn up at that said hearing?

No. No he didn’t.

What was Bannon charged with? Ahhh. Yes.

So guilty.

It’s really not rocket science.
No, it is not that simple.
Had you read the article I posted you would know that.


@Metal-Brain
From YOUR twisted sense of whatever you call duty, I am quite sure you THINK it is not that simple but there is one thing showing you ABSOLUTELY wrong: The jury not even getting a full lunch before GUILTY AND GUILTY was pronounced, less time than it took for Trump to call of his insurrectionist army.

1 edit

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
From YOUR twisted sense of whatever you call duty, I am quite sure you THINK it is not that simple but there is one thing showing you ABSOLUTELY wrong: The jury not even getting a full lunch before GUILTY AND GUILTY was pronounced, less time than it took for Trump to call of his insurrectionist army.
I know you didn't read the article I posted either.
Are you too primitive to read?

https://en-volve.com/2022/07/23/violation-dershowitz-says-blatantly-unconstitutional-bannon-conviction-very-likely-to-be-overturned/

“That’s a major constitutional issue,” said Dershowitz regarding charging people with contempt of congress when they don’t have a judicial determination on the question of executive privilege prior to potentially violating that privilege, which would carry consequences.


@Metal-Brain
Sure, I believe a one horse play. Maybe, just maybe there are others who don't agree with him.


@sonhouse
Guess what. Bannon called for an insurrection. Seriously.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/steve-bannon-calls-4-000-001203809.html


@metal-brain said
No, it is not that simple.
Had you read the article I posted you would know that.
Nobody reads any articles you post.
They’ll all rubbish.

Was Bannon summoned? Yes.
Did he turn up? No.

It’s not rocket science.


@shavixmir said
Nobody reads any articles you post.
They’ll all rubbish.

Was Bannon summoned? Yes.
Did he turn up? No.

It’s not rocket science.
Sonhouse will read it.
Bannon literally called for an insurrection. Something Trump did not do.

Either he is really confident he will prevail in the appeals process or....

Vote Up
Vote Down

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/14/politics/what-is-executive-privilege-what-matters/index.html