Go back
Pelosi profits from Russia-gate

Pelosi profits from Russia-gate

Debates

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
12 Oct 20

Conspiracy of silence from the corporate news media.

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669973
Clock
12 Oct 20

@metal-brain said
Conspiracy of silence from the corporate news media.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1NEexEintU
Restructured Syntax to make Things more clear:

Silence of the corporate media on consipracy (Theory*).

* I added a word for better understandability

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89784
Clock
12 Oct 20

@metal-brain said
Conspiracy of silence from the corporate news media.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1NEexEintU
🙄

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
12 Oct 20

@Metal-Brain

Pelosi profits from Russia-gate

So did Trump.

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20433
Clock
12 Oct 20
1 edit

CrowdStrike, a very "connected" company for crooked Pelosi to put her money!

Last I checked, CrowdStrike had turned in a redacted report of the DNC servers to
the DoJ, who in turn asked CrowdStrike for an unredacted report, which CrowdStrike
has refused to do.

CrowdStrike has since admitted they had no evidence that Russia was responsible
for the hack of the DNC server. Nice! how timely.

A forensics group has demonstrated that the downloading of the DNC email files
was done in such a short amount of time, it could not have been done over the
internet, but was within the time limit of being downloaded directly to a USB drive.
New meta-analysis has emerged from a document published today by an independent researcher known as The Forensicator, which suggests that files eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona were likely initially downloaded by a person with physical access to a computer possibly connected to the internal DNC network. The individual most likely used a USB drive to copy the information. The groundbreaking new analysis irrevocably destroys the Russian hacking narrative, and calls the actions of Crowdstrike and the DNC into question.


https://theduran.com/new-evidence-shows-dnc-server-files-were-downloaded-directly-to-usb-drive-not-hacked-by-russians/
----------------------

Rest easy, Democrats, Deep State has you covered.

caissad4
Child of the Novelty

San Antonio, Texas

Joined
08 Mar 04
Moves
618778
Clock
12 Oct 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Conspiracy of silence from the corporate news media.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1NEexEintU
Yes indeed

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
12 Oct 20

@earl-of-trumps said
CrowdStrike, a very "connected" company for crooked Pelosi to put her money!

Last I checked, CrowdStrike had turned in a redacted report of the DNC servers to
the DoJ, who in turn asked CrowdStrike for an unredacted report, which CrowdStrike
has refused to do.

CrowdStrike has since admitted they had no evidence that Russia was responsible
for the hack of the ...[text shortened]... not-hacked-by-russians/
----------------------

Rest easy, Democrats, Deep State has you covered.
“Forensicator” is not a word Fabricator is though.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
12 Oct 20

@vivify said
@Metal-Brain

Pelosi profits from Russia-gate

So did Trump.
you said it now prove it

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
12 Oct 20

@earl-of-trumps said
CrowdStrike, a very "connected" company for crooked Pelosi to put her money!

Last I checked, CrowdStrike had turned in a redacted report of the DNC servers to
the DoJ, who in turn asked CrowdStrike for an unredacted report, which CrowdStrike
has refused to do.

CrowdStrike has since admitted they had no evidence that Russia was responsible
for the hack of the ...[text shortened]... not-hacked-by-russians/
----------------------

Rest easy, Democrats, Deep State has you covered.
This ancient (July 2017) fairy tale has been debunked numerous times on this Forum and the release of the indictments against the Russians and the Mueller Report which gave detailed instances of Russian hacking including times and dates should have put this to bed for any reasonable person.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
12 Oct 20
1 edit

@no1marauder said
This ancient (July 2017) fairy tale has been debunked numerous times on this Forum and the release of the indictments against the Russians and the Mueller Report which gave detailed instances of Russian hacking including times and dates should have put this to bed for any reasonable person.
you are conflating two entirely different things. crowdstrike had nothing to do with a handful of internet posters. the fbi/doj has yet to see the servers or underlying results of the supposed dnc hack. all the have been able to obtain is crowdstrikes word.

Its not over yet.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
12 Oct 20
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
you are conflating two entirely different things. crowdstrike had nothing to do with a handful of internet posters. the fbi/doj has yet to see the servers or underlying results of the supposed dnc hack. all the have been able to obtain is crowdstrikes word.

Its not over yet.
We've been all over the ridiculous conspiracy theories regarding the DNC servers (of which there were about 150).

EDIT: That's 150 servers, not ridiculous conspiracy theories about them (there's been far more than that).

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
12 Oct 20

@no1marauder said
We've been all over the ridiculous conspiracy theories regarding the DNC servers (of which there were about 150).

EDIT: That's 150 servers, not ridiculous conspiracy theories about them (there's been far more than that).
"EDIT: That's 150 servers, not ridiculous conspiracy theories about them (there's been far more than that)."

LOL what possible difference does that make?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
12 Oct 20

@mott-the-hoople said
"EDIT: That's 150 servers, not ridiculous conspiracy theories about them (there's been far more than that)."

LOL what possible difference does that make?
The number of servers made a difference as regards the hysterical claims that the FBI should have seized all the DNC servers. We've been over this numerous times here, but the FBI doesn't normally seize servers from the victim of a hack and doing so here would have essentially put the DNC out of business in the middle of an election.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22643
Clock
13 Oct 20

@no1marauder said
This ancient (July 2017) fairy tale has been debunked numerous times on this Forum and the release of the indictments against the Russians and the Mueller Report which gave detailed instances of Russian hacking including times and dates should have put this to bed for any reasonable person.
You are delusional.

The Mueller report relied on Crowdstrike for those times and dates. Since then Crowdstrike admitted it had no evidence. What part of "no evidence" do you not understand?

I told you long ago that the CIA's UMBRAGE makes it clear proving who is hacking who is too difficult to pinpoint. You just don't want to see facts. Only an incompetent hacker would get caught. Russian hackers are far from the Gilligans and Barney Fifes of Russia.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
13 Oct 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
You are delusional.

The Mueller report relied on Crowdstrike for those times and dates. Since then Crowdstrike admitted it had no evidence. What part of "no evidence" do you not understand?

I told you long ago that the CIA's UMBRAGE makes it clear proving who is hacking who is too difficult to pinpoint. You just don't want to see facts. Only an incompetent hacker would get caught. Russian hackers are far from the Gilligans and Barney Fifes of Russia.
Like most of your failed arguments, your given is flawed.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.