An official report from People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), shows that the animal rights group put to death more than 97 percent of the dogs, cats, and other pets it took in for adoption in 2006. During that year, the well-known animal rights group managed to find adoptive homes for just 12 pets.
Should PETA end its hypocritical angel-of-death program, or stop its senseless condemnation of Americans who believe it’s perfectly ethical to use animals for food, clothing, and critical medical research?
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/pressRelease_detail.cfm/release/223
1 edit
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterI just wonder how may PETA members have had cause to use an 'over-the-counter' pregnancy test after their 'exhilitatory evening of breaking into....whatever. 'Let's celebrate with a screw.....!,'. Female animal right's activists out here, know what I mean? Wink, wink, nod's as good as ........'
An official report from People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), shows that the animal rights group put to death more than 97 percent of the dogs, cats, and other pets it took in for adoption in 2006. During that year, the well-known animal rights group managed to find adoptive homes for just 12 pets.
Should PETA end its hypocritica ...[text shortened]... critical medical research?
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/pressRelease_detail.cfm/release/223
How many animal-right's activists realise that that pregnancy test uses animal antibodies? Who cares, though? It's just a blue line. NO ANIMALS INVOLVED!!!!!!
Originally posted by znshoDon't those people use wild herbs or rhino dung or something?
I just wonder how may PETA members have had cause to use an 'over-the-counter' pregnancy test after their 'exhilitatory evening of breaking into....whatever. 'Let's celebrate with a screw.....!,'. Female animal right's activists out here, know what I mean? Wink, wink, nod's as good as ........'
How many animal-right's activists realise that that pregnancy ...[text shortened]... nimal antibodies? Who cares, though? It's just a blue line. NO ANIMALS INVOLVED!!!!!!
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterI'm part of the other PETA group .... People Eating Tasty Animals So don't blame me
An official report from People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), shows that the animal rights group put to death more than 97 percent of the dogs, cats, and other pets it took in for adoption in 2006. During that year, the well-known animal rights group managed to find adoptive homes for just 12 pets.
Should PETA end its hypocritica ...[text shortened]... critical medical research?
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/pressRelease_detail.cfm/release/223
1 edit
Originally posted by der schwarze Ritterlol. Never figured dsr for a tonguer of cheeks
An official report from People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), shows that the animal rights group put to death more than 97 percent of the dogs, cats, and other pets it took in for adoption in 2006. During that year, the well-known animal rights group managed to find adoptive homes for just 12 pets.
Should PETA end its hypocritica ...[text shortened]... critical medical research?
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/pressRelease_detail.cfm/release/223