Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 08 Aug '10 21:07
    As has been posted, large numbers don't always equal victory. Sometimes they do, as some mentioned the zulu victory over the british, they surprised a small british force with a large Zulu force, but then the british came back with another invasion force that was better matched in size and still the same technological advantages and made quick work for the remaining forces.

    In economics, China has a large, poor economy of many lower income people who are no longer dirt poor, just lower middle class poor workers, and a lot more wealthy people of course. Their billion + population and 2nd largest economy in the world demonstrates its large size, but not yet any impressive per-capita achievements like the economy of Japan or that of South Korea.

    In Battle who's victory agbainst overwhelmingly larger forces is more notable than the Persian vs Greek Wars when Xerxes overwhelmed the greeks eventually at Thermopylae but then the Greeks destroyed the Persians in the Battles of Salamis, Plataea, and Mycale.

    A tiny greek island nation of syracuse held off the romans with the help of his improved siege weapons.

    India, like China, is a poor but growing country with over a billion people. They do not live there like most people in developed European or American states.
  2. Subscriber AThousandYoung
    It's only business
    09 Aug '10 17:04
    Soviets vs Afghanistan
  3. 09 Aug '10 17:19 / 1 edit
    I will pretend to be nationalistic and mention the defeat of the Spanish armada by the Dutch during the Eighty Years' War.
  4. 10 Aug '10 00:48 / 1 edit
    Murphy's ridge..... Afghanistan..... Taliban VS 4 navy Seals
  5. Subscriber AThousandYoung
    It's only business
    10 Aug '10 02:14
    Originally posted by Hugh Glass
    Murphy's ridge..... Afghanistan..... Taliban VS 4 navy Seals
    It looks to me like the Seals lost that one.