Debates
12 Apr 07
13 Apr 07
2 edits
Originally posted by wittywonkaI guess that is debatable.
BTW, even though I think this is [b]hilarious, isn't this in the wrong forum?[/b]
Which kind of proves that it is ok here?
This debate might sound a bit like one between Thomas Aquinas, Elton John, Peter Ramus, Coco Chanel on one side and Corax of Syracuse, Duns Scotus, Aldo Leopold and Carl Jung on the other. Each side arguing the merits of [the] I Ching.
13 Apr 07
2 edits
Originally posted by darvlayLOL!
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
4 8 15 16 23 42
It's nice to be appreciated. Does this tribute ascribe to me the attribute of "lostness" or of the more actively dreadful alternative; return of the "monster"?
You really need to reign in that imagination. It's spoooookkkkkyyyy!
(pun intended lol)
13 Apr 07
Originally posted by StarValleyWyNah, I was just reading up on the possible explanation behind the "numbers" and apparently if you enter the numbers as co-ordinates into google maps it takes you to Central Africa... BUT if you enter the diametric opposite of those co-ordinates you arrive somewhere in the middle of the South Pacific right between Sydney and Los Angeles. 😵
LOL!
It's nice to be appreciated. Does this tribute ascribe to me the attribute of "lostness" or of the more actively dreadful alternative; return of the "monster"?
You really need to reign in that imagination. It's spoooookkkkkyyyy!
(pun intended lol)