@vivify said
When you defend deliberate, organized violence, like Tucker's defense of Jan 6th rioters, you're condoning that violence.
Let me guess: unless Tucker actually says on live TV "go kill people", you won't believe his speech promotes violence...right?
I don't watch Tucker often, but I am absolutely certain he does not condone violence.
Edit: To answer your question... If Tucker gave the charge on live TV for someone to "go kill people", then at that point, I'd believe Tucker condones violence. That's quite the hypothetical though, isn't it?
But tell me more, how has Tucker "[defended] deliberate, organized violence"?
Is it something like "they were right to commit violence", or is it more like "many of the protestors who committed no violent act are languishing in jail"?
Or is it something like "the 2020 election has some troublesome irregularities"?
If he cannot say the latter 2 without being accused of condoning violence, then it appears you are in favor of making it illegal to disagree with democrats.
If you have a quote, in context from Tucker Carlson that condones violence, post it. But enough of these unsubstantiated assertions that TC condones violence because he disagrees with Democrats on some issue pertaining to Jan 6th.
I'll repeat once more, it is possible to disagree with some aspects of how Jan6th is being handled or the narrative framed that is not, in any way, condoning violence, even if we know some violence happened on Jan6th. How is it you can't understand that?
But as far as condoning violence, consider this...
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/25/politics/maxine-waters-trump-officials/index.html
And consider the "dodge" by the NY Democrat congressman, who seems to condone violence by his defense of Maxine Waters. Find any major figure on the right who has encouraged confrontations toward violence this clear.