This may be a HUGE Forum subject, and I implore you folks to speak honestly and truthfully about it, so as not to start mini-wars on the Forum,, a waste of time. I have looked it over, and a lot of what is said about it is incorrect. Exaggerations and falsehoods.
It itself does not call for ending no-fault divorce, or a compete ban on abortions without exceptions. It just does not. But people who are absolutely raging say it does. It does not call for a ban on contraceptives, raising the retirement age, teaching Christian beliefs in public schools, ending marriage equality, banning Muslims from entering the country, or abolishing the FDA and EPA.
So hopefully y'all can stay on track. The news will be full of it,, one would assume that you will all keep up to speed, I cannot actually think of what I might add to posts, but would be interested in liberal comments about how it can be so bad. I did not see anything about self-reliance, so I take issue with that !!!!!!
@AverageJoe1
The bottom line for you is it is just FINE to fire 50,000 fed workers and replace them with yes men who swear loyalty to Trump and Trump alone. As just one example outside the debate on their view of divorce and abortion.
So how long did it take for you to read all 920 pages of the manifesto?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
@sonhouse saidwhat is wrong with firing a "fed worker"?
@AverageJoe1
The bottom line for you is it is just FINE to fire 50,000 fed workers and replace them with yes men who swear loyalty to Trump and Trump alone. As just one example outside the debate on their view of divorce and abortion.
So how long did it take for you to read all 920 pages of the manifesto?
getting rid of these "leakers" would be a good thing...just ask biden
https://www.vox.com/politics/359024/biden-age-leaks-lapses-polls
@Mott-The-Hoople
Did you forget the part where it is not the firing of ONE fed? It is 50,000 firings and you know that full well but you actually think you are making a point of one firing.
https://www.wsj.com/video/series/wsj-explains/project-2025s-key-architect-on-its-radical-vision-for-trumps-second-term/03A5A3C9-CEFA-4672-969A-D05A878F1E4F
In the actual 900 page doc they use the word Woke, Radical and such, doesn't worry you at all since you are part of Project 2025, in your approval, that makes you part of the radical rebuild of the entire government from loyalty to the constitution to forced loyalty to Trump, TENS OF THOUSANDS of such jobs gone and replaced with yes men.
From your twisted POV, NO PROBLEM.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
@sonhouse saidwhy are you lying about project 2025? that is not Trumps platform
@Mott-The-Hoople
Did you forget the part where it is not the firing of ONE fed? It is 50,000 firings and you know that full well but you actually think you are making a point of one firing.
https://www.wsj.com/video/series/wsj-explains/project-2025s-key-architect-on-its-radical-vision-for-trumps-second-term/03A5A3C9-CEFA-4672-969A-D05A878F1E4F
In the actual 900 page d ...[text shortened]... , TENS OF THOUSANDS of such jobs gone and replaced with yes men.
From your twisted POV, NO PROBLEM.
you are being led by your leftist media...maybe some day you will catch on
@Cliff-Mashburn
Right, Trump says he knows nothing about Heritage foundation or Project 2025
Even though the majority of the writers of that 900+ page manifesto came directly from former WH employees.
Right, totally in the dark.
Answer me this: How much do YOU plan to gain from endorsing 2025?
I assume you figure nothing wrong with firing 40 or 50thousand fed workers who are experts in their jobs and replacing them with idiots whose resume has one entry, pledging loyalty to Trump.
And the same gutting the FBI, making it a personal arm of Trump to be used as weapons to jail opponents or critics of Trump.
To mention just a FEW of the stances puked out of that document.
For instance, it is totally ok by you to have the word Woke or Radical mentioned over a dozen times in that POS work.
So I guess you will be first in line to first kiss Trumps ass and then get a sweet job as homeland security or some such.
I know you already kissed Trumps ass but now you would have to do it publically.
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@sonhouse saidYou are just making up stuff.
@Cliff-Mashburn
Right, Trump says he knows nothing about Heritage foundation or Project 2025
Even though the majority of the writers of that 900+ page manifesto came directly from former WH employees.
Right, totally in the dark.
Answer me this: How much do YOU plan to gain from endorsing 2025?
I assume you figure nothing wrong with firing 40 or 50thousand fed workers ...[text shortened]... ty or some such.
I know you already kissed Trumps ass but now you would have to do it publically.
So typical of the demtard/libtard/leftard reactions.
@Cliff-Mashburn
You clearly haven't even LOOKED at that 2025 manifesto.
Nor WILL you because you think getting rid of our government and replacing it with a bunch of yes men is a GREAT idea.
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@sonhouse saidYou clearly didn't understand my post.
@Cliff-Mashburn
You clearly haven't even LOOKED at that 2025 manifesto.
Nor WILL you because you think getting rid of our government and replacing it with a bunch of yes men is a GREAT idea.
The 2025 suggestions are not part of the Trump/Republican platform.
@sonhouse saidSettle, Son. You forget that my vision of America is diff than that of socialists and communists and Wokeists and Sonhousists.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Did you forget the part where it is not the firing of ONE fed? It is 50,000 firings and you know that full well but you actually think you are making a point of one firing.
https://www.wsj.com/video/series/wsj-explains/project-2025s-key-architect-on-its-radical-vision-for-trumps-second-term/03A5A3C9-CEFA-4672-969A-D05A878F1E4F
In the actual 900 page d ...[text shortened]... , TENS OF THOUSANDS of such jobs gone and replaced with yes men.
From your twisted POV, NO PROBLEM.
So, my view to that end is to fire anybody that the leader finds to be working outside of his policies.
Tell us, please, without ranting, that you are literally not in favor of firing people, starting with Majorkis and on down? If it takes dumping 50,000, so be it. If the facts were reversed, you would not fire people who will not properly carry out the policies of your president?
While I am at it, would you like to bet me $100 that Biden will pardon Hunter. He will.
@AverageJoe1
You are so STUPID you can't even figure out WHY they would do such a sinister evil thing as to get rid of 50,000 people who FUUKING KNOW THEIR JOBS to be replaced by ass kissing YES MEN loyal to POTUS ONLY?
What the FUUUK is wrong with you to even THINK there is nothing wrong with that POS?
@Cliff-Mashburn saidHaha. Sonhouse thinks the repubs are adopting the 2025.
You clearly didn't understand my post.
The 2025 suggestions are not part of the Trump/Republican platform.
@sonhouse saidIf I had a group of employees that were not doing their job well....I would fire each of them. I would not 'count' how many there are, I would count how much money they were costing me and fire them. No discussion.
@AverageJoe1
You are so STUPID you can't even figure out WHY they would do such a sinister evil thing as to get rid of 50,000 people who FUUKING KNOW THEIR JOBS to be replaced by ass kissing YES MEN loyal to POTUS ONLY?
What the FUUUK is wrong with you to even THINK there is nothing wrong with that POS?
So, what would you do? You won't say, will you?
Oh, to answer your question......>i would demand that they be yes men. Am I missing something here? YThey work for me, I pay their salaries, they do what I say, or I fire them. Sonhouse? Come back at me, can';t wait.