@metal-brain saidThere is no graphene oxide in covid vaccinations.
There is 0 proof of natural origin. Fauci's emails revealed a lot about the subject. Perhaps you should look into them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3F2ZJGipiE&t=38s
Learn the difference between disinformation and misinformation.
There is no proof for the lab theory.
The latter: of course there are questions to be asked, for example: why is the Chinese government so anti-investigation?
But so far there is no proof that the virus came from a lab. And all evidence points towards bat-via another species-to human transmission.
The former: that myth is thoroughly debunked. The only reason it keeps popping up is because anti-vaxxers love clinging to stupidity.
@metal-brain saidViruses are poison.
Former Pfizer Employee Karen Kingston Confirms Poison In Covid19 'Vaccine'
https://www.bitchute.com/video/u6JeQTtUqv6S/
Poison in vaccines is nothing new. Mercury used to be used in vaccines and formaldehyde is still being used. They just say the amount of poison is small so don't worry. Apparently there really is graphene oxide in the vaccines. I wonder how much.
@shavixmir saidThere is 0 proof of natural origin. Fauci's emails revealed a lot about the subject. Perhaps you should look into them.
There is no graphene oxide in covid vaccinations.
There is no proof for the lab theory.
The latter: of course there are questions to be asked, for example: why is the Chinese government so anti-investigation?
But so far there is no proof that the virus came from a lab. And all evidence points towards bat-via another species-to human transmission.
The former: that ...[text shortened]... ly debunked. The only reason it keeps popping up is because anti-vaxxers love clinging to stupidity.
There is proof of the lab theory. Fauci was so alarmed by it he emailed someone saying it was important. You can stop ignoring the proof anytime now. If you watched the video of the congressman you would know not to make a fool of yourself again.
"And all evidence points towards bat-via another species-to human transmission."
No, it doesn't. Biden must be one of those anti-vaxxers that love clinging to stupidity since he suggested the lab leak. Facebook no longer censors it like they used to. That is how bad your favorite fact checkers are. Fact checkers are merely glorified opinion pieces. They are not the last word.
You also falsely claimed the covid vaccines were not called gene vaccines. You were wrong. You are almost always wrong. You believe what you want to believe, even when a nobel prize winner disagrees with you. That is called hubris.
You have a bad case of hubris. The cure is to end your denial. That means stop fooling yourself.
@wildgrass saidThe spike protein is poison.
Viruses are poison.
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-killer-in-the-bloodstream-the-spike-protein/
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@metal-brain saidThere is as little evidence that elephants are of natural origin. There must be a really big Petri dish somewhere!
There is 0 proof of natural origin.
. The cure is to end your denial. That means stop fooling yourself.
You have a bad case of hubris
Pot, meet kettle.
@metal-brain saidI don’t know why I bother. You’ll probably not read the articles, or deny that they are valid. Still, someone else may be persuaded that your antivax hysteria is trash news.
What is your source of information?
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/index.html
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/four-vaccine-myths-and-where-they-came
https://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/goes-vaccine/
PS
One of the above-linked articles also debunks the claim that vaccines are dangerous because they contain formaldehyde. You, MB, latch onto two minuscule factoids, "formaldehyde is toxic" "vaccines contain formaldehyde", and leap to unwarranted conclusions. Yes, formaldehyde is toxic in sufficient quantity. Almost any substance is toxic, in sufficient quantity; drinking too much water too quickly is toxic, because the body cannot excrete it. One literally drowns from the inside. Does this mean water is toxic, simpliciter? No.
Same goes for formaldehyde. Yes, vaccines contain this substance, but not in sufficient quantity to be toxic. A newborn baby's body contains a higher level of formaldehyde than what is present in vaccines.
1 edit
@metal-brain saidI know! It's produced by viruses.
The spike protein is poison.
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-killer-in-the-bloodstream-the-spike-protein/
By copying the sequence and injecting you with a small dose of a non-infectious version of it, you get immunity without the same degree of toxic poison compared to actually getting sick from the virus itself.
Isn't science cool?
@wildgrass saidnon-infectious version?
I know! It's produced by viruses.
By copying the sequence and injecting you with a small dose of a non-infectious version of it, you get immunity without the same degree of toxic poison compared to actually getting sick from the virus itself.
Isn't science cool?
I don't think you understand. The spike protein is what the gene vaccines are manipulating your cell into producing. That is the most harmful part of the virus.
You didn't read the article I posted. It is obvious.
@moonbus saidI am fully aware of everything you said. It does not contradict anything I wrote on here either. As you fully admit, formaldehyde is a poison. Everything I wrote on this thread is accurate and you have not proven anything I said wrong at all.
PS
One of the above-linked articles also debunks the claim that vaccines are dangerous because they contain formaldehyde. You, MB, latch onto two minuscule factoids, "formaldehyde is toxic" "vaccines contain formaldehyde", and leap to unwarranted conclusions. Yes, formaldehyde is toxic in sufficient quantity. Almost any substance is toxic, in sufficient quantity; dr ...[text shortened]... xic. A newborn baby's body contains a higher level of formaldehyde than what is present in vaccines.
@moonbus saidI read them which is likely more than you have read of the websites I have posted. Once again, nothing on those websites contradicts anything I have said. I didn't bring up autism, so that is irrelevant. You might want to keep in mind that the CDC removed their website headline that claimed "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" before forming a conclusion though. The tobacco companies denied cigarettes caused cancer for years. It is not easy to prove causality when so many factors exist.
I don’t know why I bother. You’ll probably not read the articles, or deny that they are valid. Still, someone else may be persuaded that your antivax hysteria is trash news.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/index.html
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/four-vaccine-myths-and-where-they-came
https://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/goes-vaccine/
Just what do you think you proved with those websites? Name one single thing they proved wrong that I stated on this thread.
https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/01/cdc-quietly-removes-website-headline-claiming-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/
@Metal-Brain
The story of C19 origin is not over but for you, you activate your Trump cultist programming weaponizing the vaccine. You do that SPECIFICALLY to discredit Fauci and therefore Biden.
Where were you when TRUMP was lying about C19?
HMMM?
@metal-brain saidWhat is it about a virus that you think is harmful?
non-infectious version?
I don't think you understand. The spike protein is what the gene vaccines are manipulating your cell into producing. That is the most harmful part of the virus.
You didn't read the article I posted. It is obvious.
Maybe I'm stating the obvious but RNA and viruses are not the same thing.
@wildgrass saidI already answered that question.
What is it about a virus that you think is harmful?
Maybe I'm stating the obvious but RNA and viruses are not the same thing.
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-killer-in-the-bloodstream-the-spike-protein/
RNA is the template to create another whole virus. What about it?