President Jair Blosonaro's election fraud claims

@metal-brain said
Only if they are afraid to vote in person.

@vivify said
There's evidence al‐Assad's election was fraudulent. What does Blosanaro have besides empty claims?

@suzianne said
In 21st century America, there is no need to stand in line for hours just to be able to exercise your Constitutional right to vote.

Are you "afraid" to vote-by-mail? That speaks to your low intelligence. And gullibility.

@Metal-Brain
Right, a communist telling us mail in voting is rife with corruption. Like you give a rat's ass what happens in the US, but ONLY in what political hay you can make of it.
You fool NOBODY Comrade.

‘Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” That quote isn’t from President Trump, who criticized mail-in voting this week after Wisconsin Democrats tried and failed to change an election at the last minute into an exclusively mail-in affair. It’s the conclusion of the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker III.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/heed-jimmy-carter-on-the-danger-of-mail-in-voting-11586557667

@Metal-Brain
Funny how it didn't turn out that way, no matter who said it.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Funny how it didn't turn out that way, no matter who said it.

@suzianne said
In 21st century America, there is no need to stand in line for hours just to be able to exercise your Constitutional right to vote.

Are you "afraid" to vote-by-mail? That speaks to your low intelligence. And gullibility.

@shallow-blue said
I would never deign to vote by mail.

Of course, unlike either of you, I live in a democracy.

YouTube

@metal-brain said
But you have no evidence. If Assad got 59% of the vote would that convince you it was a legit election? Of course not. Your lame excuses are laughable.

Just admit it. Dictators rig the court system so evidence is covered up. Absence of evidence doesn't mean anything. People who assume elections somehow prove they live in a democracy are naive. For all you know the whole western world is a dictatorship with sham elections.

From the link below:

"Yang, who ran as a Democrat in 2020, explained that the U.S. needs to rethink its bipartisan system since he believes it has become reduced to sabotaging the opponent’s party.

Watch the latest video at foxnews.comHe referred to how Democrats have been spending millions of dollars to elevate particular Republican candidates who they consider the most beatable in November.

This includes funding some of the most extreme right-wing aspirants, such as GOP gubernatorial candidates Doug Mastriano of Pennsylvania, Darren Bailey of Illinois and Dan Cox of Maryland, all of whom won their primaries, and Colorado Senate candidate Ron Hanks, who lost in the primary to GOP candidate Joe O’Dea.

Yang also said during his interview with Fox News Digital that “Democrats and Americans should be angry that we’re reduced to this kind of game playing — that you’re saying that people donate money to the Democratic Party and then that money gets funneled to boost the extreme Republican because that’s going to help your chances?”

He reminded viewers that Democrats made the same mistake with Donald Trump in 2016, thinking they were going to easily beat the political outsider only to have him win the presidency.

“So what I said then was, ‘Look, be careful what you wish for,’” Yang said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/andrew-yang-says-us-2-190611063.html

Democracy in the USA is a sham. Democrats are giving money to republicans. That is why we always get undesirable candidates.

@metal-brain said
From the link below:

"Yang, who ran as a Democrat in 2020, explained that the U.S. needs to rethink its bipartisan system since he believes it has become reduced to sabotaging the opponent’s party.

Watch the latest video at foxnews.comHe referred to how Democrats have been spending millions of dollars to elevate particular Republican candidates who they consider the ...[text shortened]... a sham. Democrats are giving money to republicans. That is why we always get undesirable candidates.

@kevcvs57 said
Oh yeah wanting to face the candidate with the least chance of beating you that’s the end of democracy as we know it.
I’m sure I remember a lot of republicans including you and trump squealing like stuck pigs when Hilary got the candidacy over Bernie.
It’s a bit stupid going as far as paying for your opponents campaign because you’d think that in itself would shrink their ...[text shortened]... mongst their own party members but hey any crowd stupid enough to vote for trump it might just work.

@metal-brain said
How do you think we got Trump?

@metal-brain said
How do you think we got Trump?