Originally posted by sh76 If you don't care about the suffering of all animals, why should you care about the suffering of ANY animals?
I guess there's a line where an animal is capable of "suffering". I don't think that a fruit fly "suffers". It's very likely that a cow does "suffer". But I don't think there's any way to prove any of this. No human can really know what it's like to be a cow or a fruit fly. Everyone has to draw his own line.
Originally posted by asromacalcio Nobody eats this traditional dish any more. Why not, is it a dish once enjoyed by a social underclass that does not exist any more, or is it just cruel to even consider baking a little bunny?
poachers got 'em all! rabbits extinct in england! global warming!
Originally posted by Melanerpes As for deer. PLEASE - I'm begging all the chefs!! Someone in the US come up with a recipe that will make deer meat ultra-popular. Even better if you can make it work at a fast food outlet. The deer population around here is getting WAY out of control.
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) of mule deer, whitetailed deer, elk (wapiti), and moose. TSEs are caused by unusual infectious agents known as prions. To date, CWD has been found mainly in cervids (members of the deer family). First recognized as a clinical "wasting" syndrome in 1967 in mule deer in a wildlife research facility in northern Colorado, USA, it was identified as a TSE in 1978 and has spread to a dozen states and two Canadian provinces.[1] CWD is typified by chronic weight loss leading to death. There is no known relationship between CWD and any other TSE of animals or people. Although there have been reports in the popular press of humans being affected by CWD, a study by the CDC failed to find any relationship.[2]
Originally posted by zeeblebot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronic_wasting_disease
Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) of mule deer, whitetailed deer, elk (wapiti), and moose. TSEs are caused by unusual infectious agents known as prions. To date, CWD has been found mainly in cervids (members of the deer family). First recognized as a clin ...[text shortened]... press of humans being affected by CWD, a study by the CDC failed to find any relationship.[2]
so are you opposed to eating deer meat, or meat in general?
the condition you describe is very similar to what causes "mad cow disease" - yet people's appetite for beef is as strong as ever.
we're in a recession ... just put it in people's heads .... send the recipe for Squirrel Recession Pie to the local Letters to the Editor column, your squirrel pop will go down in no time ...
many years ago i recall a couple of Vietnamese guys being cited for trapping doves in the park ...
Originally posted by zeeblebot we're in a recession ... just put it in people's heads .... send the recipe for Squirrel Recession Pie to the local Letters to the Editor column, your squirrel pop will go down in no time ...
many years ago i recall a couple of Vietnamese guys being cited for trapping doves in the park ...
many years ago i recall a couple of Vietnamese guys being cited for trapping doves in the park
after deer and squirrels, the next thing on the list are the pigeons. Those Vietnamese guys should've been given a full time job eradicating them. Then we can move on to starlings...
Originally posted by Melanerpes [b]many years ago i recall a couple of Vietnamese guys being cited for trapping doves in the park
after deer and squirrels, the next thing on the list are the pigeons. Those Vietnamese guys should've been given a full time job eradicating them. Then we can move on to starlings...[/b]
Originally posted by Melanerpes I guess there's a line where an animal is capable of "suffering". I don't think that a fruit fly "suffers". It's very likely that a cow does "suffer". But I don't think there's any way to prove any of this. No human can really know what it's like to be a cow or a fruit fly. Everyone has to draw his own line.
Philosophically, nobody can truly prove anything except that they themselves exist and that they experience sensory perceptions.
However, we can use reason here. Examine the organism's biology and behavior and look for similarities to human biology and behavior.
I think the difference is that fish are not raised domestically in the same way. They are more often caught wild, so you cannot choose the most efficient source of fish flesh and raise mass numbers of them...or at least it's not done as often as with land animals. Right?