05 Mar 14
Originally posted by wolfgang59Of course, this idiot is from my home state.
Court shows common-sense.
http://www.timminspress.com/2014/03/04/nj-teen-loses-first-legal-battle-to-make-parents-pay-for-education
Anyone disagree?
What is worrying is that the lawyers must have believed they had a chance of winning!
A few thoughts. The parents have reaped what they have sown. They raised an entitled bitch princess, and they should not be surprised that they have an adult entitled bitch princess. Having reached the age of eighteen, she's old enough to understand the consequences of her actions. What she does not understand is how profound the divide she's created between herself and her parents will grow. She'll be thinking about this in fifty years - with regret, one hopes.
But then there's the best friend's parent. Funding the lawsuit is retribution for some slight, real or imagined. A responsible adult would have fed her some chicken soup, made sure she was calm, and then dropped her back off at her parents' house. This man has not covered himself in glory.
I agree with you - I'm shocked that the judge didn't dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice, and some stern words for both the plaintiff and her sugar daddy. I hope this slut's resume comes across my desk one day.
05 Mar 14
Originally posted by sasquatch672"Slut"?
Of course, this idiot is from my home state.
A few thoughts. The parents have reaped what they have sown. They raised an entitled bitch princess, and they should not be surprised that they have an adult entitled bitch princess. Having reached the age of eighteen, she's old enough to understand the consequences of her actions. What she does not un ...[text shortened]... both the plaintiff and her sugar daddy. I hope this slut's resume comes across my desk one day.
Jesus, get a grip.
06 Mar 14
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderI don't think you can say too many good things about an eighteen-year-old girl who tries to get her dad in a jackpot - over inappropriate touching, of all things. That's a go-away-forever kind of accusation. Personally - if I were her dad I'd go buy that Ferrari I've been longing for with her college money.
"Slut"?
Jesus, get a grip.
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by sasquatch672A) Calling a teenage girl a "slut" is contemptible, no matter what she has done. You ought to be ashamed of yourself;
I don't think you can say too many good things about an eighteen-year-old girl who tries to get her dad in a jackpot - over inappropriate touching, of all things. That's a go-away-forever kind of accusation. Personally - if I were her dad I'd go buy that Ferrari I've been longing for with her college money.
B) I don't see any such allegations of "inappropriate touching" in the article. Where are you getting this "information"?
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by no1marauderI thought 18 was a young woman.
A) Calling a teenage girl a "slut" is contemptible, no matter what she has done. You ought to be ashamed of yourself;
B) I don't see any such allegations of "inappropriate touching" in the article. Where are you getting this "information"?
What am I missing here?
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by no1marauderJesus. Can I tie your shoes for you too? Here's another one...
A) Calling a teenage girl a "slut" is contemptible, no matter what she has done. You ought to be ashamed of yourself;
B) I don't see any such allegations of "inappropriate touching" in the article. Where are you getting this "information"?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2573165/My-mom-called-porky-dad-got-drunk-told-I-just-daughter-Explosive-claims-spoiled-cheerleader-18-suing-parents-support-ran-away.html
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by sasquatch672I don't peruse the daily mail much. The allegation of "inappropriate kissing" seems like a minor part of the case and to jump from that to calling a teenage girl a "slut" is misanthropy to the nth degree.
Jesus. Can I tie your shoes for you too? Here's another one...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2573165/My-mom-called-porky-dad-got-drunk-told-I-just-daughter-Explosive-claims-spoiled-cheerleader-18-suing-parents-support-ran-away.html
There are a lot of disputed facts in the case. We'll see how it goes.
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by no1marauderShe is who's contemptible. The reality of the world is, when you screw up this bad and this publicly, people are going to have opinions. You don't like mine? That's something new...
A) Calling a teenage girl a "slut" is contemptible, no matter what she has done. You ought to be ashamed of yourself;
B) I don't see any such allegations of "inappropriate touching" in the article. Where are you getting this "information"?
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by sasquatch672You really are a piece of .............................. work.
She is who's contemptible. The reality of the world is, when you screw up this bad and this publicly, people are going to have opinions. You don't like mine? That's something new...
There's a lot of facts in dispute. Maybe you should wait until there is some sort of resolution before automatically assuming one side is telling the gospel truth and the other side, a teenage girl, is a "contemptible slut".
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by no1marauderMy way's more fun.
You really are a piece of .............................. work.
There's a lot of facts in dispute. Maybe you should wait until there is some sort of resolution before automatically assuming one side is telling the gospel truth and the other side, a teenage girl, is a "contemptible slut".
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by wolfgang59I think the case is somewhat interesting. As stated in various articles, emancipation in New Jersey is not automatic at age 18 but dependent on several variables. Additionally, it's fairly common for a non-custodial parent to have to pay a share of the educational expenses of a college aid child (and, of course, parents may claim a college student child as a dependent well after 18).
Court shows common-sense.
http://www.timminspress.com/2014/03/04/nj-teen-loses-first-legal-battle-to-make-parents-pay-for-education
Anyone disagree?
What is worrying is that the lawyers must have believed they had a chance of winning!
I think IF a court finds a "constructive abandonment" by the parents, it may well order her educational expenses to be paid by them (though I doubt she'll get support). IF the court finds she simply "ran away", she'll probably get nothing.
The decision made seems to have been a preliminary one on an "emergency" application and it shouldn't be assumed that the result will be the same after a hearing with witness testimony. As I said, there are many salient facts in dispute.
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by no1marauderI understand that you're part of the "me" generation, that legion of parasites called Baby Boomers. You grew up thinking you were entitled and you never stopped. I get that. But for those of us connected to reality, there's no free lunch. That you would entertain a teenage girl's whimsy where she actually believes her parents should pay her $31,000 a year to live only underscores your soft-headedness and lack of values.
I think the case is somewhat interesting. As stated in various articles, emancipation in New Jersey is not automatic at age 18 but dependent on several variables. Additionally, it's fairly common for a non-custodial parent to have to pay a share of the educational expenses of a college aid child (and, of course, parents may claim a college student child ...[text shortened]... same after a hearing with witness testimony. As I said, there are many salient facts in dispute.
06 Mar 14
Originally posted by sasquatch672It's impossible to discuss anything with you. You're deranged.
I understand that you're part of the "me" generation, that legion of parasites called Baby Boomers. You grew up thinking you were entitled and you never stopped. I get that. But for those of us connected to reality, there's no free lunch. That you would entertain a teenage girl's whimsy where she actually believes her parents should pay her $31,000 a year to live only underscores your soft-headedness and lack of values.
Try bothering to actually read my posts before making such a fool out of yourself.