Go back
Radical solutions for global warming

Radical solutions for global warming

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Let us assume something for a moment: in the future we are doing fairly well at reducing our green house emissions, everyone is involved and everything, but global warming is worse than we ever thought, we find out that what we are doing isn't enough to prevent catastrophe.
What radical solutions could we use to stave us catastrophic warming?

All radical solutions welcome, but remember that we will discuss them and how cost effective they would be, etc...

Here is one possible solution.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/6354759.stm
edit: this one involves increasing the amount of sunlight reflected back into space from the tops of thin, low-level clouds.

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/6369971.stm
This one involves creating a 'sulphur screen' in the stratosphere.

Vote Up
Vote Down

On BBC 2, at 21:00 there will be a program on the television about this.
It is called: 'Five ways to save the earth'

The two things I mentioned will be talked about on the program.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Radical solution? Lay down some nukes in the trouble spots of the world.....little bit nuclear winter, no more crappy countries causing problems, everybody is happy. We got clean nukes now, no worries.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Radical solution? Lay down some nukes in the trouble spots of the world.....little bit nuclear winter, no more crappy countries causing problems, everybody is happy. We got clean nukes now, no worries.
Clean nukes? No radiation?

🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bad wolf
Let us assume something for a moment: in the future we are doing fairly well at reducing our green house emissions, everyone is involved and everything, but global warming is worse than we ever thought, we find out that what we are doing isn't enough to prevent catastrophe.
What radical solutions could we use to stave us catastrophic warming?

All radica ...[text shortened]... asing the amount of sunlight reflected back into space from the tops of thin, low-level clouds.
There are plans, of course no hardware yet but the idea is you have thousands of mirrors in orbit windmill shaped where you either concentrate light on cold spots or block light from hot spots, a simple way would be to launch ultra thin mylar plastic strips into a low orbit like chaff from an electonics warfare plane, which lowers the amount of sun getting to the ground. Nice thing about that is, the chaff will fall out of orbit and burn up so it wouldn't be a permenent threat, just a temporary drop in sunlight.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
There are plans, of course no hardware yet but the idea is you have thousands of mirrors in orbit windmill shaped where you either concentrate light on cold spots or block light from hot spots, a simple way would be to launch ultra thin mylar plastic strips into a low orbit like chaff from an electonics warfare plane, which lowers the amount of sun getting ...[text shortened]... t of orbit and burn up so it wouldn't be a permenent threat, just a temporary drop in sunlight.
Will any of these technologies be able to work on Venus?

What is the latest on nanotechnologies and atmosphere conversions?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bad wolf
On BBC 2, at 21:00 there will be a program on the television about this.
It is called: 'Five ways to save the earth'

The two things I mentioned will be talked about on the program.
There wasn't a program on the environment!

You lied.

That hurts. :'(

Vote Up
Vote Down

Move to the mountain tops.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wedgehead2
There wasn't a program on the environment!

You lied.

That hurts. :'(
Oh, I'm sorry, it's on at that time tomorrow, Monday.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I read a magazine that talked about taking CO2, liquifying it, and storing it in containers either underground or in a warehouse. I don't necessarily think it's the best plan, but if push came to shove...

In the same magazine, which listed 6 different, relatively radical solutions, it talked about creating a giant solar "mirror" to deflect some of the sun's rays. Again, I don't know how feasible that would be.

A third (radical suggestion): dump iron into the oceans. Why? Because, according to the magazine, it would tremendously increase the algae population, which produces more than 50% of the world's oxygen (therefore also significantly decreasing the CO2 levels). Again, very radical and possibly dangerous because it may quickly decrease CO2 but may also disrupt the aquatic food chain (by creating an unbalanced, unchecked number of algae) in the more distant future.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wittywonka
I read a magazine that talked about taking CO2, liquifying it, and storing it in containers either underground or in a warehouse. I don't necessarily think it's the best plan, but if push came to shove...

In the same magazine, which listed 6 different, relatively radical solutions, it talked about creating a giant solar "mirror" to deflect some of the chain (by creating an unbalanced, unchecked number of algae) in the more distant future.
I don't think the first solution will work because the problem CO2 is too high up and does not really mix much with the CO2 we can easily access at ground level. At least I remember something like that about a similar topic.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bad wolf
On BBC 2, at 21:00 there will be a program on the television about this.
It is called: 'Five ways to save the earth'

The two things I mentioned will be talked about on the program.
This program will start in about 15 minutes.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bad wolf
This program will start in about 15 minutes.
good to see you're giving us a countdown... 😞

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wedgehead2
good to see you're giving us a countdown... 😞
🙂
The program has just begun.