Ready for Hillary?

Originally posted by bill718
Yes...we know. Hillary is evil, horrible, the antichrist in a skirt etc.etc. etc. On the other hand I'm sure if we elect one of those fine, christian pure, goody two shoes republicans, America would be magically transformed into a capitalistic utopian paradise just like it was when we had our good old boy George W Bush in The Whitehouse. I'm sure hoping we c ...[text shortened]... ill! (By the way...have they found any of those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet?) 🙄

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html

Gowdy on release of all transcripts on Benghazi Investigation.
YouTube

Originally posted by RJHinds
Gowdy on release of all transcripts on Benghazi Investigation.
[youtube]ZMzf-0o4kRw[/youtube]

You are flogging a dead horse. Republicans are on a witch hunt like it or not. The worse statement Hillary made was to announce to the world Republicans were the enemy. That is not a good way to start in office if she does get elected, 4 more years of loggerheads.

Originally posted by RJHinds
In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html

From the article cited:

The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government’s invasion rationale.

After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Bush insisted that Mr. Hussein was hiding an active weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of international will and at the world’s risk. United Nations inspectors said they could not find evidence for these claims.

Then, during the long occupation, American troops began encountering old chemical munitions in hidden caches and roadside bombs. Typically 155-millimeter artillery shells or 122-millimeter rockets, they were remnants of an arms program Iraq had rushed into production in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war.

All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

Originally posted by sonhouse
But you will still vote republican no matter who is nominated. You would rather have ANY bad republican over any good dem.

I really doubt Bill will be voting Republican.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Gowdy on release of all transcripts on Benghazi Investigation.
[youtube]ZMzf-0o4kRw[/youtube]

Why don't you say anything about what House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said about the Benghazi investigation?

Originally posted by RJHinds
Do you really believe Hillary Clinton or any of your liberal Democrats have any plans that will solve all those issues you mentioned?

Perhaps, perhaps not. But you can bet that none of the Republican candidates do either. In fact, most feel like John Boehner: proud that they have voted down "entitlements" time and again. The problem is, those "entitlements" are the last hope for many who have fallen through the cracks in the system. And there they are, proud that they have told the lowest segment of society "no". I wonder if any of them have told a homeless person to "get a job" recently.

Originally posted by RJHinds
The CNBC moderators did not help any with their attempts at "got you" questions in this weeks debates. It just shows the liberal partisanship of that network. 😏

I remember the gotcha question they blindsided Sarah Palin with
something like can you name some of the magazines you read

Originally posted by Suzianne
Why don't you say anything about what House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said about the Benghazi investigation?

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy was running for speaker at the time and was trying to convince Hannity that he deserved the Job, so he told a political lie as many politicians do. But he was correct that the investigation on Benghazi did uncover the email scandal as well as the Hillary's lying coverup that had an effect on her poll numbers. Hillary wasn't even running for President when the Benghazi Investigating Committee was put together. So he was wrong on that point as the reason.

Here is some help for you:

Hillary Clinton feigned ignorance when she was questioned about the Benghazi gun-running program by Senator in January 2013.
Published on May 19, 2015

YouTube

Benghazi
Published on May 9, 2013

YouTube

Benghazi: How did we get here?
Published on May 9, 2013

YouTube

Benghazi: Truth coming out - White House relations with CBS, ABC, NBC - #Benghazi Gun Running
Published on May 13, 2013

YouTube

Confirmed that the Obama Administration ran guns from Benghazi
Published on Jun 29, 2015

YouTube

Former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson: Emails Reveal White House Hid Truths About Benghazi Attack
Published on May 3, 2014

YouTube

CBS Journalist Sharyl Attkisson on C-SPAN about the Benghazi Scandal
Published on May 14, 2013

YouTube

Originally posted by RJHinds
In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html

Why would evidence of WMD in Iraq have been hidden and, even if demanded under FOI, heavily redacted?

Originally posted by finnegan
Why would evidence of WMD in Iraq have been hidden and, even if demanded under FOI, heavily redacted?

WMDs (Weapons of Mass Destruction) WERE Found in Iraq Years Ago, but Kept Confidential Until Now

YouTube

Iraq's WMD's Supplied by US and UK

YouTube

Originally posted by Suzianne
Perhaps, perhaps not. But you can bet that none of the Republican candidates do either. In fact, most feel like John Boehner: proud that they have voted down "entitlements" time and again. The problem is, those "entitlements" are the last hope for many who have fallen through the cracks in the system. And there they are, proud that they have told the l ...[text shortened]... t of society "no". I wonder if any of them have told a homeless person to "get a job" recently.

I doubt if you can cite a single instance of Hilary Clinton doing anything to help anyone who is down and out. She is as bonded at the hip to corporate interests as any Republican, perhaps more so depending on the issue.