29 Jul 10
Originally posted by sh76Well, they almost had the person who wanted people to barter chickens for healthcare.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/nv/nevada_senate_angle_vs_reid-1517.html
I'm sorry, but the GOP deserves to lose this one. Reid was ripe for the picking, but the GOP nominated a wingnut instead of people who would have steamrolled Dirty Harry.
Reid couldn't ask for better enemies.
29 Jul 10
3 edits
I originally thought that Danny Tarkanian was going to be a shoo-in for the GOP nominee - what happened to him? -- how could the son of Jerry Tarkanian have possibly lost to anyone in Nevada, let alone the two nutcases he lost to. I guess most GOPs aren't big fans of NCAA basketball?
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by Melanerpesor they're bitter over that loss to Duke in 1991
I originally thought that Danny Tarkanian was going to be a shoo-in for the GOP nominee - what happened to him? -- how could the son of Jerry Tarkanian have possibly lose to anyone, let alone the two nutcases he lost to. I guess most GOPs aren't big fans of NCAA basketball?
29 Jul 10
Originally posted by sh76Your link is not coming up. So give us the high lights if you would.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/nv/nevada_senate_angle_vs_reid-1517.html
I'm sorry, but the GOP deserves to lose this one. Reid was ripe for the picking, but the GOP nominated a wingnut instead of people who would have steamrolled Dirty Harry.
30 Jul 10
Originally posted by sh76So why is Reids opponent having trouble in the polls?
Polls Reid- Angle
RCP Average 7/12 - 7/27 45.7 42.0 Reid +3.7
Rasmussen Reports 7/27 - 7/27 45 43 Reid +2
PPP (D) 7/16 - 7/18 48 46 Reid +2
Las Vegas Review-Journal 7/12 - 7/14 44 37 Reid +7
30 Jul 10
2 edits
Originally posted by MelanerpesWhodey can tell me if I'm wrong, but I do not believe that Whodey would support a law that "would have required doctors to inform women seeking abortions about a controversial theory linking an increased risk of breast cancer with abortion."
but everything on this list are things that Whodey supports.
That's a statist requirement if there ever was one.
30 Jul 10
Originally posted by sh76Whodey doesn't mind "statist requirements" IF they are consistent with his absolutist positions. Since he believes the State should make it a crime for a doctor to perform and a woman to have an abortion, I can't imagine he'd have a problem with such a lesser (albeit stupid) requirement.
Whodey can tell me if I'm wrong, but I do not believe that Whodey would support a law that "would have required doctors to inform women seeking abortions about a controversial theory linking an increased risk of breast cancer with abortion."
That's a statist requirement if there ever was one.
Her and whodey share a disdain for Social Security and MediCare, though whodey hasn't been dumb enough to suggest their abolition.
What did you expect out of the Tea Party movement? As far as I can tell, she's mainstream TP.