Go back
Reid takes lead in NV Senate polling

Reid takes lead in NV Senate polling

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/nv/nevada_senate_angle_vs_reid-1517.html

I'm sorry, but the GOP deserves to lose this one. Reid was ripe for the picking, but the GOP nominated a wingnut instead of people who would have steamrolled Dirty Harry.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/nv/nevada_senate_angle_vs_reid-1517.html

I'm sorry, but the GOP deserves to lose this one. Reid was ripe for the picking, but the GOP nominated a wingnut instead of people who would have steamrolled Dirty Harry.
Well, they almost had the person who wanted people to barter chickens for healthcare.

Reid couldn't ask for better enemies.

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

I originally thought that Danny Tarkanian was going to be a shoo-in for the GOP nominee - what happened to him? -- how could the son of Jerry Tarkanian have possibly lost to anyone in Nevada, let alone the two nutcases he lost to. I guess most GOPs aren't big fans of NCAA basketball?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Melanerpes
I originally thought that Danny Tarkanian was going to be a shoo-in for the GOP nominee - what happened to him? -- how could the son of Jerry Tarkanian have possibly lose to anyone, let alone the two nutcases he lost to. I guess most GOPs aren't big fans of NCAA basketball?
or they're bitter over that loss to Duke in 1991

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
or they're bitter over that loss to Duke in 1991
Down with socialists like Christian Laettner and Grant Hill!!!! They're destroying America!! (or at least Nevada)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/nv/nevada_senate_angle_vs_reid-1517.html

I'm sorry, but the GOP deserves to lose this one. Reid was ripe for the picking, but the GOP nominated a wingnut instead of people who would have steamrolled Dirty Harry.
Your link is not coming up. So give us the high lights if you would.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Your link is not coming up. So give us the high lights if you would.
Polls Reid- Angle

RCP Average7/12 - 7/2745.742.0Reid +3.7

Rasmussen Reports7/27 - 7/274543Reid +2

PPP (D)7/16 - 7/184846Reid +2

Las Vegas Review-Journal7/12 - 7/144437Reid +7

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Polls Reid- Angle

RCP Average7/12 - 7/2745.742.0Reid +3.7

Rasmussen Reports7/27 - 7/274543Reid +2

PPP (D)7/16 - 7/184846Reid +2

Las Vegas Review-Journal7/12 - 7/144437Reid +7
So why is Reids opponent having trouble in the polls?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
So why is Reids opponent having trouble in the polls?
because she's a wingnut

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharron_Angle#Positions

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
because she's a wingnut

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharron_Angle#Positions
but everything on this list are things that Whodey supports.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Melanerpes
Down with socialists like Christian Laettner and Grant Hill!!!! They're destroying America!! (or at least Nevada)
Laettner is obviously conservative ("Christian" )

But Hill is almost certainly liberal ("Grant" )

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Melanerpes
but everything on this list are things that Whodey supports.
Whodey can tell me if I'm wrong, but I do not believe that Whodey would support a law that "would have required doctors to inform women seeking abortions about a controversial theory linking an increased risk of breast cancer with abortion."

That's a statist requirement if there ever was one.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Whodey can tell me if I'm wrong, but I do not believe that Whodey would support a law that "would have required doctors to inform women seeking abortions about a controversial theory linking an increased risk of breast cancer with abortion."

That's a statist requirement if there ever was one.
Whodey doesn't mind "statist requirements" IF they are consistent with his absolutist positions. Since he believes the State should make it a crime for a doctor to perform and a woman to have an abortion, I can't imagine he'd have a problem with such a lesser (albeit stupid) requirement.

Her and whodey share a disdain for Social Security and MediCare, though whodey hasn't been dumb enough to suggest their abolition.

What did you expect out of the Tea Party movement? As far as I can tell, she's mainstream TP.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
So why is Reids opponent having trouble in the polls?
Maybe it's because she is so busy verbally trashing Reid, she's not devoted much time to finding solutions to Nevada's problems. Not exactly a new agenda in politics today

Vote Up
Vote Down

Drat, if that weasel wins this Nov,, I'm hanging my flag upside down....