Go back

"Revenge porn is being used to smear and discredit a sitting congresswoman"

Debates


1 edit

Duchess64 logic...

It's ok to be a congresswoman who takes bong hits while having threesomes with a camera.

As long as she is on the left.

Just imagine what duchess64 would be saying if it was a right wing congresswoman.

Hypocrite 🤗

2 edits

@anderssen said
Duchess64 logic...

It's ok to be a congresswoman who takes bong hits while having threesomes with a camera.

As long as she is on the left.

Just imagine what duchess64 would be saying if it was a right wing congresswoman.

Hypocrite 🤗
Everyone I think enjoys a good drug induced orgy while taking pictures.

Why on earth is this even in the news?

Right wing freaks!

Disclaimer: Kids at home, be sure and take lots of antibiotics beforehand.


Hahaa

3 edits

I sure hope the Left does not try to smear Trump with this kind of smut like this by making up some outlandish conspiracy theory of Trump hiring prostitutes to urinate on him or something else sick and twisted like that.



@Duchess64
“Katie Hill may not be a perfect victim, but posting a naked photo
of her in retaliation is a rightwing smear campaign"

LOL...you are a lunatic.


Just imagine the crap she says at 4chan or some other board.


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Duchess please keep your credibility as strong as it has been. You libs can get a bit off the rails, the woman is what she is, you’d prob not let her babysit.



I do not fully get this.

If images came out of Pres. Trump doing narcotics while banging a prostitute, it would not be construed as revenge porn, but rather as vital information that we need to know about him.

It's illegal to have affairs with your staffers -- a law recently passed in the wake of the #MeToo movement. it is also rather over the top and preposterous to imagine her in some polyamory, twisty relationships while doing narcotics in hotel rooms.

I think it is legitimate for this sortof information about somoene's character to come to the surface.

It's not revenge porn -- it's someone showing the proof of morally questionable actions.


@anderssen said
Duchess64 logic...

It's ok to be a congresswoman who takes bong hits while having threesomes with a camera.

As long as she is on the left.

Just imagine what duchess64 would be saying if it was a right wing congresswoman.

Hypocrite 🤗
I would presume Dutchess would say exactly the same about any man or woman whose privacy is being invaded by 💩-sucking bastards out for revenge.

Ohhhhhh let me film us doing it....
Ohhhhhh let’s do a threesome....
Then when it all ends, you decide to publish it??? What sort of a small 🍆 or tunnel sized 🍩 does that?


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Revenge porn is being used to smear and discredit a sitting congresswoman.
Katie Hill may not be a perfect victim, but posting a naked photo
of her in retaliation is a rightwing smear campaign"

Politics is full of dirty tricks, and this is just one of them. I disagree with using photos in this manner in order to discredit and smear anyone, but would point out 2 things -

This has been a commonly used tactic in politics for decades against members of both political parties.

This correct solution for this smear campaign is not engaging in this type of behavior to begin with.

🙂



@mchill said
Revenge porn is being used to smear and discredit a sitting congresswoman.
Katie Hill may not be a perfect victim, but posting a naked photo
of her in retaliation is a rightwing smear campaign"

Politics is full of dirty tricks, and this is just one of them. I disagree with using photos in this manner in order to discredit and smear anyone, but would point out 2 things -
...[text shortened]... rect solution for this smear campaign is not engaging in this type of behavior to begin with.

🙂
That is not the correct solution.
People are free to pose and have sex anyway they want.

The proper solution is not to share someone’s private life without their consent (unless it’s illegal... added that just in case people were wondering).

The option you propose: everyone does it, so we have to accept it as “life” is so ridiculous I don’t know where to begin.