Go back
Rittenhouse lining up a case for defamation.

Rittenhouse lining up a case for defamation.

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
A judgment can be enforced for twenty years (you have to renew it after 10 years).

Plenty of time for Rittenhouse to make money.
Ain't gonna happen because he was acting in SELF DEFENSE.
Why does that go over your head?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Dood111
Ok Mr KNOW IT ALL, How many would have died that night had Ritten not been carrying an AR15?

I wasn't there but it seems to me like just walking around with a machine gun is a provocation in itself.

And another thing I saw at his testimony, like he was totally innocent of hollow point V solid bullets, THAT was total BS because there is VIDEO of him assembling and disassembling weapons so he HAD to know about bullets and the effect on flesh from each type of bullet.

Playing the dumb kid worked.

Tell me this:

Suppose it was a black dude with an AR15 walking around at night like that.

How many cops would have ignored him in THAT case?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
Ain't gonna happen because he was acting in SELF DEFENSE.
Why does that go over your head?
A civil jury won't have a "beyond reasonable doubt" standard but only a "preponderance of evidence" one. So the verdict in the criminal trial is not binding on a jury in a civil trial.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
Lawyer is just looking to get some publicity, Kyle has no money, what does he think he's going to get?
Typical lawyer, scummy ambulance chaser.
Civil litigation attorneys most usually take cases
on a contingency basis-----They collect a fee
---generally between 20%-40%----only if they win
a monetary settlement in the case.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@jimm619 said
Civil litigation attorneys most usually take cases
on a contingency basis-----They collect a fee
---generally between 20%-40%----only if they win
a monetary settlement in the case.
Exactly.
40% of nothing is still nothing. 18 year old kid hasn't got anything to take.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
A civil jury won't have a "beyond reasonable doubt" standard but only a "preponderance of evidence" one. So the verdict in the criminal trial is not binding on a jury in a civil trial.
So what?
All they have to do is look at the video.
Any idiot can see it was self defense and that he'd be dead if he didn't shoot them.
Dunno why you can't see that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
So what?
All they have to do is look at the video.
Any idiot can see it was self defense and that he'd be dead if he didn't shoot them.
Dunno why you can't see that.
If you say so.

Some people see what they want to see.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
Exactly.
40% of nothing is still nothing. 18 year old kid hasn't got anything to take.
You're wrong again Doo.
Right-wing deep pockets raised over
$2 million for his bail and legal fees.
There may be some left and, if not,
the boy is the darling of 'the wing nuts' and,
I'm sure, he can raise plenty of money if need be.


He should countersue Huber's estate for assault and battery and Grosskreutz for assault/menacing.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@jimm619 said
You're wrong again Doo.
Right-wing deep pockets raised over
$2 million for his bail and legal fees.
There may be some left and, if not,
the boy is the darling of 'the wing nuts' and,
I'm sure, he can raise plenty of money if need be.
If Kyle gets sued for millions, nobody is going to collect money for him to pay it off, he'll just ignore the bill.
Are you really that thick?
Reminds me of Bernard Schwarz, the NYC subway vigilante. He got sued by one of the victims and the jury awarded him many millions, the idiot actually thought he was going to get it through some kind of magic. He never got a penny from Schwarz.
.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sh76 said
He should countersue Huber's estate for assault and battery and Grosskreutz for assault/menacing.
Yes!
All of these bleeding hearts are forgetting that fact.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sh76 said
He should countersue Huber's estate for assault and battery and Grosskreutz for assault/menacing.
Good luck with that.

Neither should survive summary judgment; trying to disarm someone who you reasonably believe is an active shooter isn't a tort.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@dood111 said
If Kyle gets sued for millions, nobody is going to collect money for him to pay it off, he'll just ignore the bill.
Are you really that thick?
Reminds me of Bernard Schwarz, the NYC subway vigilante. He got sued by one of the victims and the jury awarded him many millions, the idiot actually thought he was going to get it through some kind of magic. He never got a penny from Schwarz.
.
There's ways to collect judgments if the person who lost the case "ignores the bill".

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
There's ways to collect judgments if the person who lost the case "ignores the bill".
hey look folks…marerider knows how to get blood from a turnip

Vote Up
Vote Down

@liljo said
In fact it WAS seriously argued!

And the argument was lost! Seriously!
LOL

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.