@mott-the-hoople said
a win for states rights and a win for babies

lets be clear, the ruling did not ban abortion, so quit lying about that

Does this ruling lead to at least 13 states taking away woman’s rights to do whst they want with their own bodies?

Well there you go.

@sleepyguy said
OK we should just kill babies then.

That's certainly a leap that I did not make.

@suzianne said
That's certainly a leap that I did not make.

You refused to draw a line, no line equals 5 minutes before birth abortions, so very clearly you did make that leap. You went full retard suzi, never go full retard.

@wajoma said
You refused to draw a line, no line equals 5 minutes before birth abortions, so very clearly you did make that leap. You went full retard suzi, never go full retard.

The 'Creepy Kiwi,' has spoken.

@sh76 said
No policy can be sustained without substantial support from women. In places where abortion is restricted or outlawed in the US, a substantial share of women in that area agree with that policy. Maybe not a majority, but a substantial minority. Women are over 50% of the vote. No policy can pass without substantial support from women in the location.

What world do you live in?
Men hold the power, men make the laws.
Try reading a bit more.
You know, besides comic books. 😛

@mott-the-hoople said
a win for states rights and a win for babies

lets be clear, the ruling did not ban abortion, so quit lying about that

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61933814

Abortion clinics closing. Looks like abortions have been banned to me.

@wajoma said
You refused to draw a line, no line equals 5 minutes before birth abortions, so very clearly you did make that leap. You went full retard suzi, never go full retard.

What's your excuse?

@suzianne said
What's your excuse?

My excuse for not being a retard is that there is a line, a woman has a certain period to vacuum the fetus out after which point she must commit to the pregnancy. Not: "No abortion" but rather "No abortion beyond a certain point"

Because the pro abortion people like you and kev are too scared to even discuss where that line might be you end up with no line, which freaks the normies out.

You, kev and shag went full retard.

@wajoma said
My excuse for not being a retard is that there is a line, a woman has a certain period to vacuum the fetus out after which point she must commit to the pregnancy. Not: "No abortion" but rather "No abortion beyond a certain point"

Because the pro abortion people like you and kev are too scared to even discuss where that line might be you end up with no line, which freaks the normies out.

You, kev and shag went full retard.

Ah, look at him quoting Tropic Thunder.

How cute.

@shavixmir said
Ah, look at him quoting Tropic Thunder.

How cute.

Check out the big brain on shag doody.

Everyone knew that already shag.

@mott-the-hoople said
a win for states rights and a win for babies

lets be clear, the ruling did not ban abortion, so quit lying about that

So you will now have 800,000 unwanted births a year. Kids being born into a cycle of abuse, abandonment, early sexual exposure, pregnancy, more unwanted kids, more societal problems etc etc.

400,000 new baby girls, every year, all unwanted and all ready to get early pregnant due a poor education and/or upbringing.

But at the same time you don’t provide free unilateral birth control, because…?

@wajoma said
My excuse for not being a retard is that there is a line, a woman has a certain period to vacuum the fetus out after which point she must commit to the pregnancy. Not: "No abortion" but rather "No abortion beyond a certain point"

Because the pro abortion people like you and kev are too scared to even discuss where that line might be you end up with no line, which freaks the normies out.

You, kev and shag went full retard.

No, I meant what's your excuse for going full retard.

Thanks for doubling down.

@divegeester said
So you will now have 800,000 unwanted births a year. Kids being born into a cycle of abuse, abandonment, early sexual exposure, pregnancy, more unwanted kids, more societal problems etc etc.

400,000 new baby girls, every year, all unwanted and all ready to get early pregnant due a poor education and/or upbringing.

But at the same time you don’t provide free unilateral birth control, because…?

Preach it, brother.

@wajoma said
You refused to draw a line, no line equals 5 minutes before birth abortions, so very clearly you did make that leap. You went full retard suzi, never go full retard.

Babies have zero to do with abortions.

No one is "killing babies".

@suzianne said
Babies have zero to do with abortions.

No one is "killing babies".

As far as anyone can ascertain, and we have to guess here because you and kev will do anything to avoid answering a straight question, on one side of the minge it's a parasitical maggot, and on the other side of the minge it's a baby.

I think there's some room for discussion, that the line is a little further back, that you're not even prepared to acknowledge that possibilty confirms your full retard status.