03 Sep '11 22:59>5 edits
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/obama-jobs-speech_b_944753.html
Somebody on Fox News (I don’t normally watch Fox News, and just stumbled on this segment, so don’t know or recall who the commentator was) said this resembled “that gang who couldn’t shoot straight”. No more than a gaffe perhaps, but a telling one? How many gaffes does one get?
Add to that:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Obama-yields-on-smog-rule-in-apf-1745827859.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=
Now I don’t really know any progressive, following, for example, Obama's initial position on drilling in the Gulf (before the BP spill), the debate over taxes, the debt ceiling, etc., etc., and now the EPA ruling on smog (and public health), who would not think that Obama (whom I voted for) will not cave (calling it “compromise” ) on anything, to the extent that the outcome could be much different—at least in the long term— if any Republican won the Presidency. I’m talking about outcome, not rhetoric along the way. [Richard Nixon, after all (who I loved to hate at the time), ended the war in Vietnam (however), opened trade with China (though he sent in a good union negotiator to do it) and supported OSHA. It is, for example, possible that an Obama would not have been able to sign OSHA into law, because it might never have been able to get to the President’s desk under prevailing conditions--and he would not have the power to see it enacted.]
I, painfully, agree with Uygur: this is not rope-a-dope; this is either deliberate betrayal of the “base” that voted for Obama, for the sake of some cynical, but likely flawed, political analysis—or it is all simple incompetence.
I would really like some of the Obama supporters (still) that I respect on here (such as Kunsoo and USAP) change my mind.
Somebody on Fox News (I don’t normally watch Fox News, and just stumbled on this segment, so don’t know or recall who the commentator was) said this resembled “that gang who couldn’t shoot straight”. No more than a gaffe perhaps, but a telling one? How many gaffes does one get?
Add to that:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Obama-yields-on-smog-rule-in-apf-1745827859.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=
Now I don’t really know any progressive, following, for example, Obama's initial position on drilling in the Gulf (before the BP spill), the debate over taxes, the debt ceiling, etc., etc., and now the EPA ruling on smog (and public health), who would not think that Obama (whom I voted for) will not cave (calling it “compromise” ) on anything, to the extent that the outcome could be much different—at least in the long term— if any Republican won the Presidency. I’m talking about outcome, not rhetoric along the way. [Richard Nixon, after all (who I loved to hate at the time), ended the war in Vietnam (however), opened trade with China (though he sent in a good union negotiator to do it) and supported OSHA. It is, for example, possible that an Obama would not have been able to sign OSHA into law, because it might never have been able to get to the President’s desk under prevailing conditions--and he would not have the power to see it enacted.]
I, painfully, agree with Uygur: this is not rope-a-dope; this is either deliberate betrayal of the “base” that voted for Obama, for the sake of some cynical, but likely flawed, political analysis—or it is all simple incompetence.
I would really like some of the Obama supporters (still) that I respect on here (such as Kunsoo and USAP) change my mind.