@Metal-Brain saidAnd you lie like you have a bet to win.
You are the liar. Steele fabricated it and was offered 1 million to prove it.
The Steele dossier is a pack of lies.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/10/11/politics/steele-dossier-fbi-durham-danchenko/index.html
https://www.hoover.org/research/why-was-steele-dossier-not-dismissed-fake
The FBI used a pack of lies to spy on Carter Page. Suck it up.
https://www.forbe ...[text shortened]... rt.com/articles/christopher-steele-admits-he-based-his-entire-dossier-on-unverified-online-comments/
And you have been told many times that the FISA warrant was never contingent on the dossier.
Stop lying.
1 edit
@Suzianne saidProve it. Talk is cheap. Like this.
And you lie like you have a bet to win.
And you have been told many times that the FISA warrant was never contingent on the dossier.
Stop lying.
From the link below:
"The so-called Steele Dossier was used by the FBI to obtain surveillance warrants on a top Trump aide."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59168626
I proved you wrong again. Suck it up. You are a lying POS and now everyone on here knows it.
@Metal-Brain saidThis is part of your ignorance.
Prove it. Talk is cheap. Like this.
From the link below:
"The so-called Steele Dossier was used by the FBI to obtain surveillance warrants on a top Trump aide."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59168626
I proved you wrong again. Suck it up. You are a lying POS and now everyone on here knows it.
You spew out news articles without reference or care about where and when in the timeline they fall. Perception changes over time. What we thought was proper before turns out later to be untrue. You accept the one piece of timeline when most thought your view was true. New evidence changes 'facts', but your hastily drawn conclusions never do.
@Suzianne saidstupid, just stupid
This is part of your ignorance.
You spew out news articles without reference or care about where and when in the timeline they fall. Perception changes over time. What we thought was proper before turns out later to be untrue. You accept the one piece of timeline when most thought your view was true. New evidence changes 'facts', but your hastily drawn conclusions never do.
@Metal-Brain saidBy the time the FISA warrant was obtained, Page had left the Trump campaign for over a month. And he had previously been the subject of an FISA warrant in 2014:
Prove it. Talk is cheap. Like this.
From the link below:
"The so-called Steele Dossier was used by the FBI to obtain surveillance warrants on a top Trump aide."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59168626
I proved you wrong again. Suck it up. You are a lying POS and now everyone on here knows it.
"Page was the subject of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant in 2014, at least two years earlier than was indicated in the stories concerning his role in the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump.[35] 2017 news accounts about the warrant indicated it was granted because of Page's ties to Buryakov, Podobnyy, and the third Russian who attempted to recruit him, Igor Sporyshev.[36]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Page#cite_note-38
And just a few months before the 2016 election, he was meeting with Russian officials in Moscow, some being sanctioned by the US government:
"Last March, shorty after he was named by Trump as one of his advisers, Page told Bloomberg News he had been an adviser to, and investor in, Gazprom, the Russian state-owned gas company. He then blamed Obama administration sanctions — imposed as a response to the Russian annexation of Crimea — for driving down the company’s stock. “So many people who I know and have worked with have been so adversely affected by the sanctions policy,” Page said in the interview. “There’s a lot of excitement in terms of the possibilities for creating a better situation.”
Page showed up again in Moscow in early July, just two weeks before the Republican National Convention formally nominated Trump for president, and once again criticized U.S. policy. Speaking at a commencement address for the New Economic School, an institution funded in part by major Russian oligarchs close to Putin, Page asserted that “Washington and other West capitals” had impeded progress in Russia “through their often hypocritical focus on ideas such as democratization, inequality, corruption and regime change.”
At the time, Page declined to say whether he was meeting with Russian officials during his trip, according to a Reuters report.
But U.S. officials have since received intelligence reports that during that same three-day trip, Page met with Igor Sechin, a longtime Putin associate and former Russian deputy prime minister who is now the executive chairman of Rosneft, Russian’s leading oil company, a well-placed Western intelligence source tells Yahoo News. That meeting, if confirmed, is viewed as especially problematic by U.S. officials because the Treasury Department in August 2014 named Sechin to a list of Russian officials and businessmen sanctioned over Russia’s “illegitimate and unlawful actions in the Ukraine.” (The Treasury announcement described Sechin as “utterly loyal to Vladimir Putin — a key component to his current standing.” At their alleged meeting, Sechin raised the issue of the lifting of sanctions with Page, the Western intelligence source said.
U.S. intelligence agencies have also received reports that Page met with another top Putin aide while in Moscow — Igor Diveykin. A former Russian security official, Diveykin now serves as deputy chief for internal policy and is believed by U.S. officials to have responsibility for intelligence collected by Russian agencies about the U.S. election, the Western intelligence source said."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-s-intel-officials-probe-ties-between-trump-adviser-and-kremlin-175046002.html
These facts were plenty to justify the initial FISA warrant.
@Earl-of-Trumps saidFrom the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020, with a Republican majority and led by Marco Rubio:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-admin-manufactured-intelligence-create-170255319.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-admin-manufactured-intelligence-create-170255319.html
Obama admin 'manufactured' intelligence to create 2016 Russian election interference narrative, documents show
----------
Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, believes there is enough evidence to prosecute Obama,
"II. (U) FINDINGS
1. (U), The Committee found, that the IRA sought to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election by harming Hillary Clinton's chances of success and supporting Donald Trump at the direction of the Kremlin. ".
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/sites-default-files-documents-report-volume2.pdf
The IRA here stands for: " the St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency (IRA)".
@no1marauder saidbe sure to bring all this up at Obama's trial.
From the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020, with a Republican majority and led by Marco Rubio:
"II. (U) FINDINGS
1. (U), The Committee found, that the IRA sought to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election by harming Hillary Clinton's chances of success and supporting Donald Trump at the direction of the Kremlin. ".
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/w ...[text shortened]... -volume2.pdf
The IRA here stands for: " the St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency (IRA)".
@Earl-of-Trumps saidSurely, not even you can't be soooooooooooooooooooo duped you actually believe such a thing would happen.
be sure to bring all this up at Obama's trial.
This is 9/10 distraction and 1/10 Gabbard trying to get back in Donald's good graces after she made the mistake of actually testifying truthfully about Iran's non-existent nuclear weapons programme.
@no1marauder saidyour people like to weaponize the law, and Trump is going tit-for-tat with you.
Surely, not even you can't be soooooooooooooooooooo duped you actually believe such a thing would happen.
This is 9/10 distraction and 1/10 Gabbard trying to get back in Donald's good graces after she made the mistake of actually testifying truthfully about Iran's non-existent nuclear weapons programme.
enjoy the moment
@Earl-of-Trumps saidOK, you are enough of a brainwashed dupe to believe that.
your people like to weaponize the law, and Trump is going tit-for-tat with you.
enjoy the moment
Keep reading Breitbart.
@no1marauder saidLOL!
By the time the FISA warrant was obtained, Page had left the Trump campaign for over a month. And he had previously been the subject of an FISA warrant in 2014:
"Page was the subject of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant in 2014, at least two years earlier than was indicated in the stories concerning his role in the 2016 presidential campaign of Don ...[text shortened]... p-adviser-and-kremlin-175046002.html
These facts were plenty to justify the initial FISA warrant.
That is the dumbest excuse for political bias and anti Russian demonization I have ever heard. As if doing business with Russians is somehow nefarious. Before all of the sanctions were imposed it was common practice.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2019/10/22/most-foreign-capital-flowing-into-russia-stock-market-is-american/
And look into the Podesta Group's ties to Russia and the Clinton Foundation accepting money from Russia to pay Bill for doing a speech. And there is Hunter too. Don't get me started.
@Suzianne saidYou have yet to provide any source of info. Try doing that instead of spamming lies. You never prove anything because you lie so much. You are just another naive person that thinks investing in Russian stock shares is nefarious. As if nobody does it in this country.
This is part of your ignorance.
You spew out news articles without reference or care about where and when in the timeline they fall. Perception changes over time. What we thought was proper before turns out later to be untrue. You accept the one piece of timeline when most thought your view was true. New evidence changes 'facts', but your hastily drawn conclusions never do.
If a US president meets with Putin is that Russian collusion?
collusion
noun
: secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose
Not unless you can prove collusion with Russia. Nobody proved that.
@no1marauder saidThe irony. This Russia collusion is a hoax and you were duped to believe it.
OK, you are enough of a brainwashed dupe to believe that.
Keep reading Breitbart.
It was propaganda to demonize Russia because the USA was preparing Ukraine for a Russian invasion.
https://www.rt.com/news/621721-russiagate-anti-russia-campaign-gabbard/
Our government knew Russia would not allow Ukraine to join NATO and would invade if necessary. That was the whole plan. To get Russia bogged down in a war with Ukraine. It was a carefully laid trap.
If you want people to support war with Russia you demonize them. They used a Russia collusion hoax to get democrats to hate Russia. There is and never was any evidence of collusion. It was a false rumor promoted by the corporate news media and certain corrupt politicians.
There is no evidence of Russia collusion.
@Metal-Brain saidBut they DID prove Russian "involvement".
You have yet to provide any source of info. Try doing that instead of spamming lies. You never prove anything because you lie so much. You are just another naive person that thinks investing in Russian stock shares is nefarious. As if nobody does it in this country.
If a US president meets with Putin is that Russian collusion?
collusion
noun
: secret agreement o ...[text shortened]... illegal or deceitful purpose
Not unless you can prove collusion with Russia. Nobody proved that.
What do you think that means?