@metal-brain saidStop posting utter garbage.
Learn to read.
https://truthcomestolight.com/[WORD TOO LONG]/
@shavixmir saidNope. Your source of information stated they used vero cells.
I’ve rebuked your idiotic claims multiple times.
Here we go again and for the last time:
https://dearpandemic.org/has-coronavirus-been-isolated/
From the abstract in the link below:
"We found that the virus replicates to high titer in Vero-CCL81 cells and Vero E6 cells in the absence of trypsin. "
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239045/?fbclid=IwAR04oK4vpxMHVBvWXNct0EapWvKnDwnW8RD0N8dKh1cZoQ3AvAJK8OG_UBI
Dear Andrew Johnson,
Re: Documents held showing SARS-COV2 has been isolated and Causes
COVID-19
Thank you for your email dated 24 July 2020. In accordance with Section 1(1)(a) of
the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act), I can confirm that Public Health
England (PHE) does not hold the information you have specified.
Your Request
All records in the possession, custody or control of Public Health England
describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus, directly from a sample taken
from a diseased patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with
any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka vero cells;
liver cancer cells).
Please note that I am using "isolation" in the every-day sense of the word: the
act of separating a thing(s) from everything else. I am not requesting records
where "isolation of SARS-COV-2" refers *instead* to:
• the culturing of something, or
• the performance of an amplification test (i.e. a PCR test), or • the sequencing
of something.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/679566/response/1625332/attach/html/2/872%20FOI%20All%20records%20describing%20isolation%20of%20SARS%20COV%202.pdf.html
Just because one person holds some sort of far flung definition of isolation, doesn’t make it so.
From the link I posted, which you obviously don’t read:
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated way back in January 2020 by separate teams of scientists all around the globe. It was isolated by a US team from the very first case in the United States on January 22, 2020. And by China, Italy, Korea, and half a dozen other countries around the world within the first months of the pandemic.
You’re right that without isolating the virus, it would be impossible to make a vaccine. I agree that it’s important to check your facts and think critically about what you hear, especially on social media. I looked for fact checkers on this, and learned that a Canadian environmentalist made this claim on a talk radio show. The same person also claimed that AIDS, West Nile Disease, and polio are not caused by viruses. He based his arguments on scientific theories from over 100 years ago before viruses were even discovered.
It’s just not true that scientists never identified the virus. They’ve even sequenced its genetic code and taken pictures of it with an electron microscope. You can check this out yourself. Just google “have scientists isolated the COVID-19 virus?” and then the words “fact check.’
There you go.
But just to be sure, here’s information on the genetic code (way above your IQ, I’m telling you now).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC544107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539923/
@shavixmir saidHere is an excerpt from the link below:
Just because one person holds some sort of far flung definition of isolation, doesn’t make it so.
From the link I posted, which you obviously don’t read:
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated way back in January 2020 by separate teams of scientists all around the globe. It was isolated by a US team from the very first case in the United States on Janu ...[text shortened]... ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC544107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539923/
"#4 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: CDC Admitted They Made a Digital Virus of 30,000 Base Pairs Using 37 Actual Sample Base Pairs
As covered in my previous article SARS-CoV-2: The Stitched Together, Frankenstein Virus, the CDC has already admitted that SARS-CoV-2 is a computer-generated digital virus, not a real living virus. As I wrote:
“In other words, it is a Frankenstein virus which has been concocted and stitched together using genomic database sequences (some viral, some not). It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a computer database. In this paper, the CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs which means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue. In other words, they took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs. This computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud.”
In this article In June Study CDC Scientists Make 2 COVID Admissions that Destroy Official Narrative I reveal how the CDC admitted in their paper that they extrapolated their make-believe virus. Here is the quote:
“Whole-Genome Sequencing
We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs.”
Another way to say this is that the “virus” has been constructed using a technique called de novo assembly which is a method for constructing genomes from a large number of (short or long) DNA fragments, with no a priori knowledge of the correct sequence or order of those fragments. You can read more about it here."
https://www.globalresearch.ca/10-reasons-sars-cov-2-imaginary-theoretical-virus/5735833
@metal-brain saidTotal BS.
Here is an excerpt from the link below:
"#4 SARS-CoV-2 the Theoretical Virus: CDC Admitted They Made a Digital Virus of 30,000 Base Pairs Using 37 Actual Sample Base Pairs
As covered in my previous article SARS-CoV-2: The Stitched Together, Frankenstein Virus, the CDC has already admitted that SARS-CoV-2 is a computer-generated digital virus, not a real living virus ...[text shortened]... it here."
https://www.globalresearch.ca/10-reasons-sars-cov-2-imaginary-theoretical-virus/5735833
Stop it.
@shavixmir saidProve it.
Total BS.
Stop it.
Total BS should be easy to prove, yet you always fail to do so.
River’s postulates were proposed by Thomas M. River in 1973 to establish the role of a specific virus as the cause of a specific disease. They are modifications of Koch’s postulates. They are as follows:
1.The viral agent must be found either in the host’s (animal or plant) body fluids at the time of disease or in cells showing lesions specific to that disease.
2. The host material with the viral agent used to inoculate the healthy host (test organism) must be free of any other microorganism.
3. The viral agent obtained from the infected host must produce the specific disease in a suitable healthy host, and/or provide evidence of infection by inducing the formation of antibodies specific to that agent.
4. Similar material (viral particle) from the newly infected host (test organism) must be isolated and capable of transmitting the specific disease to other healthy hosts.
Whichever set of postulates is used, SARS-CoV-2 fails the test. Dr. Andrew Kaufman does a great job explaining why in this video. The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (allegedly causing the disease COVID-19) has not been shown to be present only in sick people and not in healthy ones.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eOGvhrGTVq6N/
@metal-brain saidI have proven it.
Prove it.
Total BS should be easy to prove, yet you always fail to do so.
River’s postulates were proposed by Thomas M. River in 1973 to establish the role of a specific virus as the cause of a specific disease. They are modifications of Koch’s postulates. They are as follows:
1.The viral agent must be found either in the host’s (animal or plant) body fluids a ...[text shortened]... present only in sick people and not in healthy ones.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eOGvhrGTVq6N/
I’ve pointed you to the sites which debunk your rubbish. I’ve pointed out that the mere concept that there are vaccines is proof that the virus has been isolated.
I’ve given you links to health services which explain all this to you.
And I’ve hooked you up to sites which literally give you the whole genetic make-up of the bloody virus.
There is nothing more I can hand you.
If you still don’t believe me, get in your car, drive to the CDC and ask for them to prove it to you. Get them to show you the actual genetic make-up, the RNC and how they’ve isolated it.
Maybe if you can stick your nose in the proverbial trough, it might get through to you.
You are so tiresome. You are really getting on my nerves.
@shavixmir saidPartial SARS-CoV-2 sequences from early outbreaks in Wuhan were removed from a US government database by the scientists who deposited them.
I have proven it.
I’ve pointed you to the sites which debunk your rubbish. I’ve pointed out that the mere concept that there are vaccines is proof that the virus has been isolated.
I’ve given you links to health services which explain all this to you.
And I’ve hooked you up to sites which literally give you the whole genetic make-up of the bloody virus.
There is ...[text shortened]... al trough, it might get through to you.
You are so tiresome. You are really getting on my nerves.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01731-3
Have they been restored so they are available online yet? If not the whole genetic make-up of the bloody virus is NOT available. Why do you suppose they removed it?
You also are ignoring the rule #2 of River's postulates. Your sources did not meet that rule.
River’s postulates were proposed by Thomas M. River in 1973 to establish the role of a specific virus as the cause of a specific disease. They are modifications of Koch’s postulates. They are as follows:
1.The viral agent must be found either in the host’s (animal or plant) body fluids at the time of disease or in cells showing lesions specific to that disease.
2. The host material with the viral agent used to inoculate the healthy host (test organism) must be free of any other microorganism.
3. The viral agent obtained from the infected host must produce the specific disease in a suitable healthy host, and/or provide evidence of infection by inducing the formation of antibodies specific to that agent.
4. Similar material (viral particle) from the newly infected host (test organism) must be isolated and capable of transmitting the specific disease to other healthy hosts.
Whichever set of postulates is used, SARS-CoV-2 fails the test. Dr. Andrew Kaufman does a great job explaining why in this video. The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (allegedly causing the disease COVID-19) has not been shown to be present only in sick people and not in healthy ones.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eOGvhrGTVq6N/
@shavixmir saidPartial SARS-CoV-2 sequences from early outbreaks in Wuhan were removed from a US government database by the scientists who deposited them.
It has not been removed.
And it has been shared all over then world.
Besides the fact that multiple organisations isolated it to compare with the original.
You didn’t check one link I sent you.
Stop crawling back here and oozing moronity.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01731-3
My source is the Journal Nature, a respected science journal. Stop lying.