Go back
Say I was Russia and in an evil mood…

Say I was Russia and in an evil mood…

Debates

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89746
Clock
68d
Vote Up
Vote Down

Why would I not supply Iran with nuclear weapons and tell them to nuke Tel Aviv and American/ British targets?

And say I was Iran and felt existentially threatened by Israel… what would make me not use those nukes?

Probably best I’m not Russian. Or evil.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
68d

@shavixmir
Yep, and OF COURSE since the world HATES Jews, there would naturally not be a single response by the west.

Cliff Mashburn

Joined
09 Jan 22
Moves
1139
Clock
68d

@sonhouse said
@shavixmir
Yep, and OF COURSE since the world HATES Jews, there would naturally not be a single response by the west.
The West supports Israel, you get mad. The West doesn't support Israel, you get mad.
I think you just like being mad. It's a common leftist state of mind.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89746
Clock
68d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@shavixmir
Yep, and OF COURSE since the world HATES Jews, there would naturally not be a single response by the west.
No. But think if it like this:

Israel is an existential threat to Iran. So, Iran’s regime is going to end anyway. Now, should they or should they not nuke Tel Aviv and Western targets?

And that Russia is behind it… nobody knows.

See? That’s what makes it evil and workakable.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89746
Clock
68d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Cliff-Mashburn said
The West supports Israel, you get mad. The West doesn't support Israel, you get mad.
I think you just like being mad. It's a common leftist state of mind.
It’s not about getting mad.
It’s about the West fighting a proxy war in Ukraine and then Russia doing the same to the West, using Iran and abusing Israel (otherwise the Western targets would seem far fetched).

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
68d

@shavixmir said
Why would I not supply Iran with nuclear weapons and tell them to nuke Tel Aviv and American/ British targets?

And say I was Iran and felt existentially threatened by Israel… what would make me not use those nukes?

Probably best I’m not Russian. Or evil.
Any country using nukes against another nuclear power knows it's getting nuked back. Targeting the U.S./Britain also means fighting all of NATO.

I'm not sure if Iran felt threatened by Israel; their attacks were motivated by revenge for killing the Hezbollah leader. However, the Ayatollah may feel threatened now that he's in hiding. Nety went out of his way to appeal to the citizens of Iran and make clear that his target is their leader, not them.

Then again, a frightened Ayatollah is basically the same thing as a frightened Iran.

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
68d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
Why would I not supply Iran with nuclear weapons and tell them to nuke Tel Aviv and American/ British targets?

And say I was Iran and felt existentially threatened by Israel… what would make me not use those nukes?

Probably best I’m not Russian. Or evil.
I don't see how Russia could transport them to Iran without multiple nation's spy satellites spotting them on the move.

Any strike by an identifiable foreign state, nuclear or conventional, on America, would involve all of NATO. Iran may feel existentially threatened, but not by Israel; Israel does not have that much firepower. NATO does have the firepower to flatten Iran, so I doubt the Iranians would attempt a strike on U.S. soil, except by their own proxies (like paying/training terrorists to crash planes into buildings).

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89746
Clock
68d

@moonbus said
I don't see how Russia could transport them to Iran without multiple nation's spy satellites spotting them on the move.

Any strike by an identifiable foreign state, nuclear or conventional, on America, would involve all of NATO. Iran may feel existentially threatened, but not by Israel; Israel does not have that much firepower. NATO does have the firepower to flatten Iran, ...[text shortened]... soil, except by their own proxies (like paying/training terrorists to crash planes into buildings).
By train.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89746
Clock
68d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@vivify said
Any country using nukes against another nuclear power knows it's getting nuked back. Targeting the U.S./Britain also means fighting all of NATO.

I'm not sure if Iran felt threatened by Israel; their attacks were motivated by revenge for killing the Hezbollah leader. However, the Ayatollah may feel threatened now that he's in hiding. Nety went out of his way to appeal t ...[text shortened]... not them.

Then again, a frightened Ayatollah is basically the same thing as a frightened Iran.
Put yourself in his shoes (or towel) :
You know the youth (a majority) aren’t too keen on your restrictive measures.
Israel is threatening to kill you.

Why wouldn’t you nuke them? What would you have to lose?

Rajk999
Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
260844
Clock
68d

@shavixmir said
By train.
I think you underestimate the amount of intelligence Israel has on nuclear weapons that exist in the Arab world. If anything resembling a nuke moves toward countries like Iran, im pretty sure Israel will know and take it out. Several Arab states were trying to develop nukes and Israel removed them. They know that their very existence depends on this knowledge.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
68d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
Put yourself in his shoes (or towel) :
You know the youth (a majority) aren’t too keen on your restrictive measures.
Israel is threatening to kill you.

Why wouldn’t you nuke them? What would you have to lose?
In other words Israel may have made their enemy more dangerous by putting their back against the wall.

Perhaps.

Rajk999
Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
260844
Clock
68d

@vivify said
In other words Israel may have made their enemy more dangerous by putting their back against the wall.

Perhaps.
More dangerous?
You mean more dangerous than wanting to wipe Israel off the map?
Or wanting to kill all Jews?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26751
Clock
68d
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
Why would I not supply Iran with nuclear weapons and tell them to nuke Tel Aviv and American/ British targets?

And say I was Iran and felt existentially threatened by Israel… what would make me not use those nukes?

Probably best I’m not Russian. Or evil.
What makes you think Russia is in a position to “tell” Iran to do anything?

Nukes in Iran are a threat to Russia as well as Israel. And something like that would come back to Russia. They couldn’t hide something like that.

thedogandthecello

Joined
09 Sep 06
Moves
1140
Clock
68d

@shavixmir

The only similarity between you and Russia is you look like a Gramma babushka from Russia.

Make me some pierogies.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120526
Clock
68d
1 edit

Israel has loads of nukes, Iran has none. Which is why Iran has called for all Moslems across the world to “unite” against Israel. Which imo is code for start prepping for local terror bombings, stabbings, car killings etc in western countries which support Israel because it hurts the west but doesn’t add to the provocation of Israel.

The US have warned Israel off of attacking Iranian nuclear powers and oil installations becuase they need oil without price increases. They don’t give a fuk about “Iran”.

Meanwhile Starmer will do and say whatever the EU suggests he says and is just happy that this war is a good thing as it means less “free-gear-Starmer” news. Although Angela’s latest freebie to Ibiza is embarrassing.

Anyway, Iran is a massive country (Israel is about the size of Wales) which will be doubling down on nuke development.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.