Go back
SCOTUS: Biden's Black Woman plan is unConstitutionally illegal

SCOTUS: Biden's Black Woman plan is unConstitutionally illegal

Debates

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Oops....meant Constitutionally Illegal.. The Court has found that racial preferences are unconstitutional for public education and unlawful for businesses, But Biden is promoting a Quota System, which has been out of date for over 40 years. If his candidate is the most meritorious then fine, but to single out black race, and female sex, as principal criteria, is lawf ...[text shortened]... es, is the key to solving poverty and reducing inequality in our free enterprise capitalist society.
Blah blah blah

Vote Up
Vote Down

@pb1022 said
Yeah, until the discrimination affects you.

When a black woman gets a promotion you thought you were more qualified for, *you’ll* be the one boo freakin’ hooing.

I’ll bet you’re all in favor of raising taxes as long as *your* taxes don’t get raised, and I’ll bet you’re all in favor of affordable housing as long as it’s not in *your* neighborhood, and I’ll bet you’re all ...[text shortened]... re all in favor of defunding the police as long as *your* 911 calls get answered promptly.

Right?
You apparently don't know me from Adam.

1 edit
Vote Up
2
Vote Down

All people complaining about "competence" need to take a look at Amy Coney Barrett and how she was pushed through.

Where was your outrage then?

Not a peep out of you because that incompetent moron was going to vote how you wanted on trampling women rights to remove unwanted parasites from their own bodies.

Biden should have just bloody said nothing and simply present his nominee for the seat.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@zahlanzi said
All people complaining about "competence" need to take a look at Amy Coney Barrett and how she was pushed through.

Where was your outrage then?

Not a peep out of you because that incompetent moron was going to vote how you wanted on trampling women rights to remove unwanted parasites from their own bodies.

Biden should have just bloody said nothing and simply present his nominee for the seat.
Nice point, the less biden says the better, he should absolutely stop speaking, or what ever you call that rambling incoherence. Just turn up, sniff some hair and hold his fists out in front of him with his elbows at his side.

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@wajoma said
Nice point, the less biden says the better, he should absolutely stop speaking, or what ever you call that rambling incoherence. Just turn up, sniff some hair and hold his fists out in front of him with his elbows at his side.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JkxSlSstRw
Yeh, that was totally my point. You're a genius.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@earl-of-trumps said
Jim, Jim, Jim, please. Discriminating against applicants because of their skin color, their gender, is *illegal*.

I didn't pass the law (amendment), Jim, your people did. lol
That is 'it' , isn't it. The gist of this thread. It is illegal. What else, Earl, are these fellers so wrapped up in. I think there needs to be another thread on their comments?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@zahlanzi said
Yeh, that was totally my point. You're a genius.
Cheers for that, kind words indeed, you may have over stated my ability but I like to think I have a certain big picture talent.

A thumbs up for you.

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
Jim, Jim, Jim, please. Discriminating against applicants because of their skin color, their gender, is *illegal*.

I didn't pass the law (amendment), Jim, your people did. lol
''WE PEOPLE,'' didn't do it........The Congress did it.
Let's try to stick to, and present FACTS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As Reagan promised in his campaign, ''To nominate a woman to SCOTUS.''
So has Biden promised in his campaign, ''To nominate a Black woman..........''
The President's nomination may be whomever he pleases,
for whatever reason...........I posted the procedure.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@pb1022 said
Yeah, until the discrimination affects you.

When a black woman gets a promotion you thought you were more qualified for, *you’ll* be the one boo freakin’ hooing.

I’ll bet you’re all in favor of raising taxes as long as *your* taxes don’t get raised, and I’ll bet you’re all in favor of affordable housing as long as it’s not in *your* neighborhood, and I’ll bet you’re all ...[text shortened]... re all in favor of defunding the police as long as *your* 911 calls get answered promptly.

Right?
What makes you think so?
Another opinion in a debate of facts,
in this case, simply consider the source.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Oops....meant Constitutionally Illegal.. The Court has found that racial preferences are unconstitutional for public education and unlawful for businesses, But Biden is promoting a Quota System, which has been out of date for over 40 years. If his candidate is the most meritorious then fine, but to single out black race, and female sex, as principal criteria, is lawf ...[text shortened]... es, is the key to solving poverty and reducing inequality in our free enterprise capitalist society.
Another non issue, put front and center by our Conservative friends.
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/several-presidents-sought-barrier-breaking-231600373.html

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@suzianne said
Oh, the irony.
the only irony here is libs defending blatant racism

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@jimm619 said
What makes you think so?
Another opinion in a debate of facts,
in this case, simply consider the source.
Yes, I’m sure *anyone* would be overjoyed to get denied a promotion because of discrimination, have their taxes raised, have an affordable housing development built in their neighborhood (principally because of the size and traffic and school enrollment it would generate,) and have their 911 calls not answered promptly.

No one would have a problem with any of that.

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
the only irony here is libs defending blatant racism
Why is this the only thread where cons aren't?

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@pb1022 said
Yes, I’m sure *anyone* would be overjoyed to get denied a promotion because of discrimination, have their taxes raised, have an affordable housing development built in their neighborhood (principally because of the size and traffic and school enrollment it would generate,) and have their 911 calls not answered promptly.

No one would have a problem with any of that.
You cannot say that
is a cause and effect.
I'll remind you that, in a debate,
opinions don't matter, FACTS DO. 😛

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@Mott-The-Hoople
Yeah, I guess you are jealous, because supposedly only ultrarightwingnutjobs like you are the only one and you want your sand box back.