Go back
SCOTUS now fully political

SCOTUS now fully political

Debates

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
02 Dec 21

So with the death of Roe V Wade, SCOTUS now proves itself to be nothing but hired political hacks.

How do American citizens trust those bozo's NOW?

Roe V Wade has a near 3/4 majority for it in the US but that doesn't bother the republican assassins in SCOTUS because they are doing what they were hired to do.

Now the label of political hack will be the new STENCH of SCOTUS.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
02 Dec 21
2 edits

@sonhouse said
So with the death of Roe V Wade, SCOTUS now proves itself to be nothing but hired political hacks.

How do American citizens trust those bozo's NOW?

Roe V Wade has a near 3/4 majority for it in the US but that doesn't bother the republican assassins in SCOTUS because they are doing what they were hired to do.

Now the label of political hack will be the new STENCH of SCOTUS.
As Yogi Berra said, ''The opera ain't over 'til the fat lady sings.''
The court is very aware of being viewed as 'politically motivated.'
Justice Roberts wants a 'compromise consensuses.'
Let's keep our fingers crossed.........Even our conservative 'friends' should
support a woman's right to choose..........Well-to-do women will always
be able to obtain abortions----Who is left out? Poorer women and a
disproportionate number of women of color. So, my conservative 'friends',
your desired' white majority will more rapidly disappear if ROE is struck down.
https://news.yahoo.com/poll-as-supreme-court-hears-mississippi-case-just-24-percent-of-americans-want-roe-v-wade-overturned-193250390.html

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
02 Dec 21

@jimm619
I don't think Kavanaugh and his buddies give a crap about optics.
They are there to fulfil their promise to kill Roe V Wade at ANY cost.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
02 Dec 21

@jimm619 said
As Yogi Berra said, ''The opera ain't over 'til the fat lady sings.''
The court is very aware of being viewed as 'politically motivated.'
Justice Roberts wants a 'compromise consensuses.'
Let's keep our fingers crossed.........Even our conservative 'friends' should
support a woman's right to choose..........Well-to-do women will always
be able to obtain abortions----Who ...[text shortened]... -court-hears-mississippi-case-just-24-percent-of-americans-want-roe-v-wade-overturned-193250390.html
I don't agree with Robert's views
but, I do believe him to be an honest man,
and hopefully he can build consensus.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
02 Dec 21

@jimm619
Right, getting consensus from those three zombie republican political hacks who care nothing about precedent or tradition or 50 years of Roe V Wade as set in stone, till these three political hacker boobs came along.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
02 Dec 21
1 edit

@sonhouse said
@jimm619
Right, getting consensus from those three zombie republican political hacks who care nothing about precedent or tradition or 50 years of Roe V Wade as set in stone, till these three political hacker boobs came along.
Thomas is, and has always been, the worst.
His confirmation hearing was stormy.
He was only nominated because he was a
conservative jurist, who happened to be Black ,
to replace the great Black Justice, Thurgood Marshall.
He has always been very mediocre. Alito, I believe,
is the real Nazi.............Not many comments from our
conservative 'friends', I see...............
Waiting to see which way the wind blows, much like their leaders.

q

Joined
05 Sep 08
Moves
66636
Clock
02 Dec 21

@sonhouse said
So with the death of Roe V Wade, SCOTUS now proves itself to be nothing but hired political hacks.

How do American citizens trust those bozo's NOW?

Roe V Wade has a near 3/4 majority for it in the US but that doesn't bother the republican assassins in SCOTUS because they are doing what they were hired to do.

Now the label of political hack will be the new STENCH of SCOTUS.
I support rights as I see no reason to force people to have children who don't want them. But I do believe that one could easily believe that abortion was not contemplated in the constitution and therefore stretching it though penumbral rights is invalid.
Why exactly do you think supporting abortion rights isn't political but being against them is?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
02 Dec 21

@quackquack
WHY? You really have to ASK that question?

This is about CONTROL of women.

And OF COURSE you will NEVER understand that since you are alleged male.

These are religious nutters in high government offices.

They assume MEN are the ones who should control the reproductive rights of women.

Oh, BTW, it is FIFTY YEARS of president and it is not until political HACKS like Kavanaugh came around, there was ZERO difference in the interpretation of the law for the past FIFTY YEARS.

NOTHING has changed EXCEPT the presence of political hacks masquerading as a supreme court justice.

THAT is what is happening and there is a HUGE problem with that.

It will become QUITE obvious they ARE being political hacks after they kill Roe V Wade, the what, 24 odd states will stop abortion IMMEDIATELY.

And that would be because they are obsessed with control of women.

There is no getting around that FACT JACK.

Ban abortion at 6 weeks when the woman doesn't even know she is pregnant?

That is not sinister control of women?

That is unconscionable and should NEVER happen in the USA.

THAT is more like North Korea kind of control.

And now of course WOMEN WILL DIE because not all of them can afford to drive to Mexico from Texas and so will resort to back street clothes hanger abortions AGAIN just like BEFORE Roe V Wade.

There have been several unconscionable actions by the US under Trump's watch, like ripping babies from moms and putting five THOUSAND children in CAGES like animals and treated not much better.

Now THESE draconian laws coming around AND the HUNDREDS of voter suppression laws already on the books in some half of all US states for the specific purpose of keeping republicans in power PERMANENTLY.

There are a cabal of insurrectionists IN CONGRESS who WILL be found out and hopefully put in prison where the REST of the traitors go.

I hope they NAIL that basstard Roger Stone and ALL his traitor buddies like "General" Flynn, no more a general now than I am an astronaut.
He is a disgrace to his rank. HUGE SHAMEFULL disgrace.

To think I served FOUR DAM YEARS in the military only to see FLYNN become a traitor to the US AND WALKS FREE.

Mott The Hoople

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147484
Clock
02 Dec 21

@quackquack said
I support rights as I see no reason to force people to have children who don't want them. But I do believe that one could easily believe that abortion was not contemplated in the constitution and therefore stretching it though penumbral rights is invalid.
Why exactly do you think supporting abortion rights isn't political but being against them is?
"Why exactly do you think supporting abortion rights isn't political but being against them is?"

BAM!

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
02 Dec 21
1 edit

@Mott-The-Hoople
And OF COURSE an IDIOT like you would agree.

IT IS ABOUT CONTROL OF WOMEN, which you FULLY AGREE.

That makes YOU part of the problem.

YOU want to be back in 1880 where women had no say in ANYTHING.

But that is YOUR goal, controlling women from birth to death.

You are one sick SOB. No, one sick POS.

Hey, you should move to Afghanistan, you would fit right in there, THEY control all their women now, not even letting them WORK, female doctors, GET OUT OF HERE, you need to be at home making babies and feeding us and keeping the house clean while WE go out raping any woman we find, if she complains, SHE is put in prison for DARING to defy a MALE.

Yep, you would fit really well there.

q

Joined
05 Sep 08
Moves
66636
Clock
03 Dec 21
1 edit

@sonhouse said
@quackquack
WHY? You really have to ASK that question?

This is about CONTROL of women.

And OF COURSE you will NEVER understand that since you are alleged male.

These are religious nutters in high government offices.

They assume MEN are the ones who should control the reproductive rights of women.

Oh, BTW, it is FIFTY YEARS of president and it is not until pol ...[text shortened]... I served FOUR DAM YEARS in the military only to see FLYNN become a traitor to the US AND WALKS FREE.
I'm pro choice and I personally think we should extend, not contract, the amount of time a person has to get an abortion. The case on hand must decide whether a state law which limits abortion to fifteen week is unconstitutional (not whether the limitation is a good idea). And your claim that the only reason someone would fail to strike down the Mississippi law is that they want to control women is wrong and shows a failure to understand opposing views.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37304
Clock
03 Dec 21
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
"Why exactly do you think supporting abortion rights isn't political but being against them is?"

BAM!
Clues in the Phrase ‘ ABORTION RIGHTS! the right NOT to become a parent just because the STATE says you MUST.
Everyone already has the right to not have an abortion.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
03 Dec 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@quackquack
But the political hacks on SCOTUS don't CARE about constitutionality, they are going to just say, we pass this back to the states to deal with BECAUSE WE ARE POLITICAL HACKS.

jimm619

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
251103
Clock
03 Dec 21
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
"Why exactly do you think supporting abortion rights isn't political but being against them is?"

BAM!
It's called REALITY, MUTT.
Abortions ARE LEGAL
................HELLO

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.