Originally posted by JS357
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/supreme-court-independent-redistricting-115642.html
"The Supreme Court on Monday will hear arguments that it’s unconstitutional for a state to isolate its legislature from the redistricting process, citing the federal constitution’s Election Clause. And if the court sides with the plaintiffs, it could upend political districts and election laws from coast to coast before 2016."
It's a foolish case where a hypertechnical, literal reading of the Constitution flies in the face of the basic principles of the Framers.
The Legislature is nothing more than the People's agents having no more power than the People have granted them. If and when the People act by popular referendum or initiative they are acting directly as a Legislature bypassing their agents for reasons they in their wisdom find sufficient. The idea that the People in the States were disabled from doing so in this area by the Elections Clause of the Constitution would have never occurred to the Framers.
An instrument should be judged by what its makers intended drawing on all available evidence not merely one word out of context. Nowhere did the Framers ever suggest that the Constitution should be interpreted in such a cramped and unrealistic manner as the Scalias of the world insist.
The result of the referendum which created an independent body to fix election districts was an act of the People which infringed no Natural Right that any person possessed not is it inconsistent with the basic principles the Framers believed in. In fact, the People were trying to stop the undemocratic practice of gerrymandering which damages and to a certain extent defeats the very principle of democratic representation the House is supposed to be based on. The law should be upheld.
EDIT: Suppose the People of Arizona abolished their State Legislature and decided to govern their State by direct democracy (something they surely have the legitimate power to do); all bills to be decided by "one person, one vote". By the logic the right wing justices were using, that would mean they could not make any rules concerning the elections of the members of that State's Federal delegation in the House of Representatives because the "State legislature" has to do so! This is, of course, manifestly absurd.