@no1marauder said“ IF the committee was so obsessed with "the 4 best teams" (and results be damned), it would have selected Georgia anyway which was defending champion, ranked #1 all year and was favored by almost a touchdown when they played Alabama. The Bulldogs would undoubtedly have been favored against any of the 4 teams selected.”
This wasn't the FSU team that would have been in the playoff; after they got screwed, 23 of their players, including virtually all the ones who will be draft picks, either elected not to play or joined the transfer portal. This was a shell, not the team that went 13-0. https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/fsu-players-skipping-orange-bowl-here-s-the-full-list-of-seminole ...[text shortened]... layed Alabama. The Bulldogs would undoubtedly have been favored against any of the 4 teams selected.
here you make the case of why Alabama should have been in over FSU.
Georgia may have been favored by vegas, Alabama beat them, the number one team and defending NCs.
If anything Georgia should have been in and Michigan out for cheating.
@mott-the-hoople saidThat's merely pointing out the Committee's hypocrisy, not endorsing it.
“ IF the committee was so obsessed with "the 4 best teams" (and results be damned), it would have selected Georgia anyway which was defending champion, ranked #1 all year and was favored by almost a touchdown when they played Alabama. The Bulldogs would undoubtedly have been favored against any of the 4 teams selected.”
here you make the case of why Alabama should ...[text shortened]... ne team and defending NCs.
If anything Georgia should have been in and Michigan out for cheating.
Conference championships are supposed to count according to their guidelines. And no undefeated power 5 Conference Champion had ever been passed over.
Hey, I get it; they wanted a SEC team for TV ratings. Cash money is more important to the NCAA than trivial matters like putting in the teams that earned it over the whole season.
@shavixmir
You can have him, we don't want him here, he is a total embarrassment to call him a human being, more like a very weak AI masquerading as a person. AI on the order of a Commodore 64 with only one K of ram.
@no1marauder saidits all about the fans…no one wants to see 63-3 blowouts.
That's merely pointing out the Committee's hypocrisy, not endorsing it.
Conference championships are supposed to count according to their guidelines. And no undefeated power 5 Conference Champion had ever been passed over.
Hey, I get it; they wanted a SEC team for TV ratings. Cash money is more important to the NCAA than trivial matters like putting in the teams that earned it over the whole season.
The ACC has not been relevant since bowden era
they should not be considered a power conference.
@sonhouse saidwhat is a “k of ram”?
@shavixmir
You can have him, we don't want him here, he is a total embarrassment to call him a human being, more like a very weak AI masquerading as a person. AI on the order of a Commodore 64 with only one K of ram.
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidIf so, how come their teams went 6-4 against SEC teams this year?https://www.sportingnews.com/us/ncaa-football/news/acc-record-vs-sec-teams-florida-state-college-football-
its all about the fans…no one wants to see 63-3 blowouts.
The ACC has not been relevant since bowden era
they should not be considered a power conference.
playoff/744908c7e500ba8824a46514
And Clemson beat Alabama twice in the final in the last 6 years including a 44-16 massacre in 2019.
@sonhouse saidHe can have who, shytehouse? Who is ‘him’.?
@shavixmir
You can have him, we don't want him here, he is a total embarrassment to call him a human being, more like a very weak AI masquerading as a person. AI on the order of a Commodore 64 with only one K of ram.
@sonhouse saidWhat case ooothouse? You write to yourself? A rhetorical question.
@Mott-The-Hoople
I rest my case🙂
BOO!
@averagejoe1 saidFree housing?
I hope you are joshing, you and I could be friends. You have me wrong, I am a realist vs your idealism. (Free housing for every person???!!?) I employ common sense, rationale and logic. Note that none of that is present in your housing mantra. None of it.
One of my best friends, a black man, and another is a partner (very smart and engaging) in my firm. Yes if he gre ...[text shortened]... r to us all. The FSU vs Georgia game should be the best today. They both have something to prove!
Everybody living in houses, is where I stand. And yes, the houses must be affordable.
But you are mistaken. We would not be friends.
@shavixmir saidYou’d be crazy about me. I love life like you do.
Free housing?
Everybody living in houses, is where I stand. And yes, the houses must be affordable.
But you are mistaken. We would not be friends.
You seem to be doing the lib gambit of shuffling your comments of a year ago, that a human rights dictum be interpreted as providing free housing for everyone.. You said that. Now, you say affordable.
It’s not just you, all libs do that. Very strange. It’s in the blood!
@averagejoe1 saidBasic housing should be at the very least affordable. Ditto with higher education.
You’d be crazy about me. I love life like you do.
You seem to be doing the lib gambit of shuffling your comments of a year ago, that a human rights dictum be interpreted as providing free housing for everyone.. You said that. Now, you say affordable.
It’s not just you, all libs do that. Very strange. It’s in the blood!
Not everyone is rich, white guy. You've worked hard to keep it that way.
@sonhouse saidyabut...shatmixer is well versed in the language of dumbass
@AverageJoe1
Funny, I was talking to Shav who knew exactly what I was saying.