Originally posted by twhiteheadIn this case it is kind of moot the lack of volume control, I played it and it sounded ok in my earbuds but if it's really too loud there should be a volume control in the guts of the box you are using, cell phone, tablet, pc, whatever.
Nice video. But what website uses a video player with no volume control? If they are short of programmers, perhaps they could out source some jobs to South Africa?
Anyway that distracts from the message.
Don't give tea to unconscious people.
Originally posted by sonhouseYes, but I have all my system volume controls set at my preferred level, and besides, who wants to go hunting for them when they should be right there in the video player?
... but if it's really too loud there should be a volume control in the guts of the box you are using, cell phone, tablet, pc, whatever.
The post that was quoted here has been removed"P.S. Regarding the instant 'thumbs down'"
thumbs down is a lazy and cowardly way to show disapproval. one doesn't risk anything (not even an already anonymous account on a chess site). with thumbs down, one doesn't have to explain one's position of disapproving a video explaining sexual consent (or a woman that found a way to deal with a trauma ) and most importantly, one isn't identified.
who gives a single loving about thumbs down
(another example: my post that the town of manbij Syria was liberated from ISIS received two thumbs down. A video that shows women crying of happiness, burning veils, a man who lost his arm for some idiotic charge rejoicing that ISIS is gone, people showing where ISIS used to crucify and behead people, such as a woman who thought children. How many kinds of disgusting must you be to dislike such a video? How futile would it be to explain yourself to such people?)
Originally posted by ZahlanziNo more cowardly than you hiding behind a pseudonym spelled z a h a l a z , And the amount of effort that goes into your posts, that would be the difference between a thumbs down (very very lazy) and one of your master pieces (very lazy).
"P.S. Regarding the instant 'thumbs down'"
thumbs down is a lazy and cowardly way to show disapproval. one doesn't risk anything (not even an already anonymous account on a chess site). with thumbs down, one doesn't have to explain one's position of disapproving a video explaining sexual consent (or a woman that found a way to deal with a trauma ) and most ...[text shortened]... must you be to dislike such a video? How futile would it be to explain yourself to such people?)
It's your hypocrisy that lets you down every time.
A result of lack of principle and rigor, a result of laziness.
19 Aug 16
Originally posted by Wajomaso i guess we have one of those that thumbs downed the story of Manbij liberated from ISIS
No more cowardly than you hiding behind a pseudonym spelled z a h a l a z , And the amount of effort that goes into your posts, that would be the difference between a thumbs down (very very lazy) and one of your master pieces (very lazy).
It's your hypocrisy that lets you down every time.
A result of lack of principle and rigor, a result of laziness.
Originally posted by ZahlanziThat is untrue.
one clearly saw what was the most important issue
But since you want to go there, I feel compelled to point out that the video, although funny, isn't going to have much effect. Seriously, if you are using date rape drugs, then you know full well that the person in question does not want sex. If you are not using date rape drugs then call an ambulance now.
If we are not talking about the 'unconscious' part of the video then I honestly don't think the rest of the video is going to actually change anyone's behaviour. If you are the type of person who forces people to have sex, a tea analogy isn't going to change that.