Originally posted by xsFar more acceptable than losses through car accidents brought about by the consumption of alcohol that the government collects taxes for whilst banning dope.
If you're from where you say...
your beaches have um!
Are you saying there are acceptable losses of human life here?
1 edit
Originally posted by STANGThanks for not answering the question you were asked and instead answering the one you wanted to hear.
Far more acceptable than losses through car accidents brought about by the consumption of alcohol that the government collects taxes for whilst banning dope.
You'd make a good bootlicker/politician.
Originally posted by XanthosNZOur snivelling prime minister got sucked in by Bush and his financial rhetoric and consequentially joined America's invasion of Iraq. The invasion divided America. It also divided Australia.
Should we be allowed to use rioting mobs to protect beaches from Lebs?
Originally posted by xsMeh, people get eaten by sharks all the time. It's a risk we KNOW and take each time we step into their territory. I live in Perth and literally 200m from my house is a place where in 2000 a man got killed by a shark.
If you're from where you say...
your beaches have um!
Are you saying there are acceptable losses of human life here?
Plus It's just common sense to not swim early in the morning or late at night because thats when they mostly attack.
Originally posted by EsotericYes, in Cape Town too people know where not to swim and there are signboards up for the sake of tourists. Sharks (and all the other fish,dolphins, turtles, etc that get caught in the nets) shouldn't have to suffer because people are stupid.
Plus It's just common sense to not swim early in the morning or late at night because thats when they mostly attack.