01 Sep 10
Originally posted by Sam The ShamDo you think it should have been classified a hate crime? Do you actually have any evidence that it fits the criteria?
But it wasn't a hate crime.
Maybe her father will shake the guy's hand.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38949288/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
01 Sep 10
Originally posted by Sam The ShamIf the colors were reversed then maybe some would and surely some wouldn't. Obviously one person thinks it is in this case.
If colors were reversed it would be why not now?
So you don't have any evidence that it was a hate crime I take it?
02 Sep 10
Originally posted by PsychoPawnSam believes (or pretends to believe) that every time a white person commits a crime against a black person it is treated as a "hate crime". Of course, that's utter and complete nonsense, but trying to explain such things to a blatant, not particularly smart racist (not that there are many smart racists) like Sam is a bit difficult.
If the colors were reversed then maybe some would and surely some wouldn't. Obviously one person thinks it is in this case.
So you don't have any evidence that it was a hate crime I take it?
02 Sep 10
Originally posted by no1marauderSan lives in Az as I do. His demeanor and comments are fairly representative down here.
Sam believes (or pretends to believe) that every time a white person commits a crime against a black person it is treated as a "hate crime". Of course, that's utter and complete nonsense, but trying to explain such things to a blatant, not particularly smart racist (not that there are many smart racists) like Sam is a bit difficult.
02 Sep 10
Originally posted by no1marauderThat is the automatic assumption until proven otherwise and you know it. You are too cowardly to admit it.
Sam believes (or pretends to believe) that every time a white person commits a crime against a black person it is treated as a "hate crime". .
But black on white crime? Never considered a hate crime unless the evidence is overwhelming.
To deny that is asinine.
02 Sep 10
1 edit
Originally posted by Sam The ShamThere is no such "automatic assumption". In reality, very few interracial crimes of any type are treated as "hate crimes":
That is the automatic assumption until proven otherwise and you know it. You are too cowardly to admit it.
But black on white crime? Never considered a hate crime unless the evidence is overwhelming.
To deny that is asinine.
Charging a hate crime -- targeting someone because of race, sexual orientation or other ethnic factors -- in the U.S. is rare; maybe only 1 percent of the cases get prosecuted, according to experts and available court records. Even when police believe a hate crime occurred, it rarely leads to a prosecution and conviction.
"Just because a crime is a black on white crime or a white on black crime or a Jewish victim or a gay or lesbian doesn't necessarily make it a hate crime," said Steven Freeman, associate director of civil rights for the Anti-Defamation League in New York.
Only a handful of murders have been prosecuted as hate crimes in the U.S., said Jack McDevitt, associate dean of Northeastern University's College of Criminal Justice. "Trying to detect motivation in somebody's behavior is very, very difficult."
http://wcco.com/topstories/hate.crime.prosecution.2.367128.html
02 Sep 10
Originally posted by Sam The Shamdo you base your claim on facts or on hearsay? do you really believe that anytime a white person harms a black it is considered a hate crime?
That is the automatic assumption until proven otherwise and you know it. You are too cowardly to admit it.
But black on white crime? Never considered a hate crime unless the evidence is overwhelming.
To deny that is asinine.
stop playing the victim. nobody is convinced.
02 Sep 10
Originally posted by Sam The Shamnowhere in the link does it say this was a hate crime. in fact the attacker's race isn't even mentioned until the very end.
But it wasn't a hate crime.
Maybe her father will shake the guy's hand.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38949288/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/
all the victim is saying is that the attack was unprovoked and they hope the attacker is brought to justice and made to explain their actions.
my opinion is that a mad woman wanted to cause some pain and the victim was unfortunate to be at the wrong time.
your opinion is that this was a hate crime, that the black woman attacked the white because of race and that society protects the blacks.
my opinion about your opinion is that you are instigating hate against blacks and you are inches away from donning a kkk sheet robe and ask for some lynchings.