14 Feb '11 17:02>
I think we can all agree that the right to vote is a key element in any democracy.
But should we really be encouraging people to vote or should we merely allow them to do so if they want to?
Stephen Dubner, in a recent Freakonomics podcast, took the position that an individual voting is invariably a waste of time and resources. He said that people vote only because they feel good doing so, but that, of course, the odds of their vote mattering are virtually nil.
He suggests that in any case, if we don't encourage people to vote, only the more committed, more knowledgeable people will end up caring enough to vote and we will probably end up with a better government elected by better informed voters.
He wryly suggests that if we want to encourage people to help society to feel good about themselves, we should encourage people to pick up one piece of trash on election day, which will likely have a greater impact on society than voting will and consumes far fewer resources.
He also says that he hasn't voted in decades because, as an economist, he cannot justify spending the time and gasoline necessary to do something that will almost certainly have no effect on anything.
Anyone agree or disagree?
But should we really be encouraging people to vote or should we merely allow them to do so if they want to?
Stephen Dubner, in a recent Freakonomics podcast, took the position that an individual voting is invariably a waste of time and resources. He said that people vote only because they feel good doing so, but that, of course, the odds of their vote mattering are virtually nil.
He suggests that in any case, if we don't encourage people to vote, only the more committed, more knowledgeable people will end up caring enough to vote and we will probably end up with a better government elected by better informed voters.
He wryly suggests that if we want to encourage people to help society to feel good about themselves, we should encourage people to pick up one piece of trash on election day, which will likely have a greater impact on society than voting will and consumes far fewer resources.
He also says that he hasn't voted in decades because, as an economist, he cannot justify spending the time and gasoline necessary to do something that will almost certainly have no effect on anything.
Anyone agree or disagree?