13 Jun '13 20:34>
Originally posted by sasquatch672Jesus, I do not know how to respond.
I reread my post. It contained an inaccuracy. James Clapper lied. I do not contend that Mr. Alexander lied. I stand corrected.
Originally posted by johnnylongwoodyYou practice those answers. Some of them sart with, "I cannot confirm or deny..." You don't lie. That's perjury. Having knowledge of classified information does not render a person immune from the law.
You have to also allow for the fact that it is very difficult
for an intelligence officer to be appearing in front of a
Senate Committee and have to answer questions of a
sensitive nature. There will be some questions that he
knows the answers to but cannot divulge them.
Originally posted by sasquatch672You would be surprised what qualifies you for immunity.
You practice those answers. Some of them sart with, "I cannot confirm or deny..." You don't lie. That's perjury. Having knowledge of classified information does not render a person immune from the law.
Originally posted by moon1969Unlike you, I do not blindly accept the positions and activities of the Party with whom I identify.
I wonder if you would have been more objective about Snowden from the very beginning if a Republican were President?
Originally posted by sasquatch672Sasquatch principles and positions.
Unlike you, I do not blindly accept the positions and activities of the Party with whom I identify.
Some Islamofascists have repeatedly said that their goal is to destroy America. Now, I contend that they know it is not possible to destroy the bricks and mortar of America, so what do they mean?
They want to destroy the image of America. They ...[text shortened]... ng something more important than the World Trade Center - our moral and intellectual fabric.