Originally posted by stockenI've said it before. I'll say it again. I don't come here to debate.
I agree actually. Then, your opponents would say: "What about the people that would have died under Saddams reign if the americanos didn't invade Iraq?" Then you say: "Well, it wouldn't be 20,000+. That's for sure!" Then they say: "You don't know that" Then you say: "The invasion of Iraq was wrong. How wrong? Over 20,000+ dead wrong." Then they say: ...
New arguments!!! PLEASE!!! ðŸ˜
20,000+ MURDERS
1 edit
Originally posted by STANGThis is the debate forum. Go to the general forum if you don't want to debate (although, it may turn out to be a debate after all).
I've said it before. I'll say it again. I don't come here to debate.
20,000+ MURDERS
Besides, the whole f***ng world knows about Iraq now. Some like it. Some don't. Nagging about it will not improve the situation for people suffering. Get on a plane and help the people in need. Don't sit around yelling at americans who most likely has no power whatsoever to actually change things.
Your message is good. Nothing wrong with it. But you're yelling at the wrong people. Seek out people suffering, help them by bringing their situation to the attention of the world community and hope that despite human inertia, things will change soon.
There are lots of americans opposed to (probably even a little ashamed of) Bush. Most americans now realize they've been cheated into thinking that invading Iraq was necessary due to WMD and terrorism, when in fact it was about oil and Saddam not being the us of a gov. little puppet anymore. Now, that the us of a is in Iraq, I think the best thing for them to do is to finish what they've started. To try and build the foundation for a "real" democracy and then leave. At least that way, the americans will go down in history as not being total clowns (in world politics, that is).