This is meant for sonhouse.
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Police-Let-Protestors-Into-Capital
He wants to deny history to fit a false narrative, but the video evidence will not go away like he would like. The capitol police let protesters into the capitol building. It is a fact.
@Metal-Brain saidThe FBI is supposed to be letting all of the information out they have very soon, like next week.
This is meant for sonhouse.
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Police-Let-Protestors-Into-Capital
He wants to deny history to fit a false narrative, but the video evidence will not go away like he would like. The capitol police let protesters into the capitol building. It is a fact.
@mike69 saidI had not heard that. What is your source of info?
The FBI is supposed to be letting all of the information out they have very soon, like next week.
Even if true it depends if it gets news coverage so most people know about it. I might read about it on Zero Hedge or something, but most people will depend on hearing about it on TV to know about it.
Most people claim they do not trust the mainstream news, but that is where they get their news for some stupid reason. I admit I watch it too, but I watch it to examine the propaganda. I take note of the omissions that few people notice......because something has to come up to think about it. That is why omission works so well in propaganda. If I say Opossum you think about an Opossum. If I never mentioned it you would not think about an Opossum.
If you don't want people to know John Kerry comes from Opium trade money from his Forbes side you don't mention it. The corporate news media never mentions it. That is why most people do not know. They omit it.
Sonhouse is just in denial. I think he is lying to himself. He doesn't want to accept the CP let protesters in the CB and were not charged with seditious conspiracy because it doesn't make any sense unless it was an inside job.
@Metal-Brain saidI agree, mainstream media is telling people half truths to advance their agenda and what people like him want to hear. I’ve seen them do this many times going between the different news stations. I even gave sonhouse an example of it on the Congress woman activist the assaulted ice. His news zoomed in and only showed their heads where you couldn’t see what happened. Fox showed the the whole video plain to see, it was crickets from him. You tube is messing up for me and not letting me copy links. This is the title of the interview and the part mentioned starts at 25:46 but the whole thing is worth watching now that I’ve done it twice😁.
I had not heard that. What is your source of info?
Even if true it depends if it gets news coverage so most people know about it. I might read about it on Zero Hedge or something, but most people will depend on hearing about it on TV to know about it.
Most people claim they do not trust the mainstream news, but that is where they get their news for some stupid reason. ...[text shortened]... not charged with seditious conspiracy because it doesn't make any sense unless it was an inside job.
WAVE OF TRANSPARENCY': FBI director hints at agency's move to rebuild Americans' trust
@Metal-Brain saidWhen you catch up with him, ask him to comment on:
This is meant for sonhouse.
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Police-Let-Protestors-Into-Capital
He wants to deny history to fit a false narrative, but the video evidence will not go away like he would like. The capitol police let protesters into the capitol building. It is a fact.
Tax cuts
Spending cuts
Border security
Energy independence
Balance of trade
That, Americans will not get a tax hike, which they will if Bill is not passed.
Oh, and the reduction in drug costs,,,,he really hates expensive drugs
Over one mill of illegals are violent criminals , jail them or send them home
This is a veiled exercise to see WHAT he answers with!
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidYou've been shown video of the first breach of the Capitol around 2:15 PM January 6, 2021 many times showing rioters breaking a window, entering through it and then kicking down a door from the inside to let many of the mob enter.
This is meant for sonhouse.
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Police-Let-Protestors-Into-Capital
He wants to deny history to fit a false narrative, but the video evidence will not go away like he would like. The capitol police let protesters into the capitol building. It is a fact.
Here it is again; it's the third video down the page: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/new-surveillance-video-from-capitol-riot-shows-moments-building-was-stormed
EDIT: A slightly better one; watch from about 4:30 to 4:55. https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=initial+breach+into+capitol&&mid=C5FEB7A4AE2CB43787F5C5FEB7A4AE2CB43787F5&&FORM=VRDGAR
@no1marauder saidNONE of that matters to the commie Metal addled brain.
You've been shown video of the first breach of the Capitol around 2:15 PM January 6, 2021 many times showing rioters breaking a window, entering through it and then kicking down a door from the inside to let many of the mob enter.
Here it is again; it's the third video down the page: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/new-surveillance-video-from-capitol-riot-shows-moments-bui ...[text shortened]... latedvideo?&q=initial+breach+into+capitol&&mid=C5FEB7A4AE2CB43787F5C5FEB7A4AE2CB43787F5&&FORM=VRDGAR
He will just go back to THE COPS LET THEM IN. PERIOD.
@no1marauder saidYes, but that was another door. I was not talking about that door or the window a small unarmed woman was brutally murdered unnecessarily at. I was talking about the door the capital police were letting in protesters in and occasionally opening the door for them to come in like gentlemen with great guest etiquete.
You've been shown video of the first breach of the Capitol around 2:15 PM January 6, 2021 many times showing rioters breaking a window, entering through it and then kicking down a door from the inside to let many of the mob enter.
Here it is again; it's the third video down the page: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/new-surveillance-video-from-capitol-riot-shows-moments-bui ...[text shortened]... latedvideo?&q=initial+breach+into+capitol&&mid=C5FEB7A4AE2CB43787F5C5FEB7A4AE2CB43787F5&&FORM=VRDGAR
They staged a break in with undercover FBI goons at about the same time they were letting them in at another door. We have been over this all before. Do you want to post a timeline of events again? We can go over that all over again too if you would like. It doesn't really matter though. If they let them in "before" Ashli Babbit was murdered it still looks bad. If it was the same time it looks worse. Cops don't communicate? LOL!!
If it happened after Babbit was murdered it looks really bad, doesn't it?
What are you thinking? You cannot rewrite history, even by lying about the timeline. It will all still look bad no matter what happened first. Now what do ya got?
You cannot rewrite history.
@Metal-Brain saidSo why had they to smash the windows. Or is that the way you behave when invited?
This is meant for sonhouse.
https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Police-Let-Protestors-Into-Capital
He wants to deny history to fit a false narrative, but the video evidence will not go away like he would like. The capitol police let protesters into the capitol building. It is a fact.
Did anyone invite someone to sit in the office of the speaker of the House? And who could do that?
This has been debunked so often, you should be more than ashamed that you can't find anything new to please the comrade superior of yours.
@sonhouse saidThey did let them in. I provided you with the video proving it. The CP even opened the door to let some of them in. Don't you believe your lying eyes?
NONE of that matters to the commie Metal addled brain.
He will just go back to THE COPS LET THEM IN. PERIOD.
What the CP did at another door and window only makes it look worse. They were letting in protesters at one door while killing a small unarmed woman at another. Cops don't communicate anymore? Did they misplace their radios?
So it was a mass radio communication malfunction then? Kind of like prison camera malfunctions with BOTH Epstein and Jean-Luc Brunel? LOL!
@Ponderable saidThe capitol police let those goons smash windows. I have video evidence of that too. Do you want to see it?
So why had they to smash the windows. Or is that the way you behave when invited?
Did anyone invite someone to sit in the office of the speaker of the House? And who could do that?
This has been debunked so often, you should be more than ashamed that you can't find anything new to please the comrade superior of yours.
1 edit
@Metal-Brain saidNo. I have see the life coverage and no they were not invited by anone to smash windows.
The capitol police let those goons smash windows. I have video evidence of that too. Do you want to see it?
And I fear the video is about 45 minutes with a lot of we will show, we will show, then comes someone who has accidently overheard someone teling someone else, that they have under the seal of silence been told, that the brother of an acqaintance knows the secretray of someone or other who had errouneeouls ygotr a folder in which was a note which said that -.....
Or in short: Show me ONE instance in which a court ruled on the evidence. And explain why courts did send people to jail and those people didn't introduce the evidence you claim.
@Ponderable
Why did the capitol police let earmuff man come from behind CP lines, try to break down the door and let him go back behind CP lines again?
https://sharylattkisson.com/2023/10/watch-january-6th-part-1/
https://sharylattkisson.com/2023/10/watch-january-6th-part-2/