Go back
Taking bets...

Taking bets...

Debates

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147754
Clock
27 Sep 20
3 edits


Candace Owens
@RealCandaceO
·
15h
Amy Coney Barrett:

-She’s a woman, so they can’t hire their usual fake sexual assault victims.
-She has two black children, so they can’t smear her as a racist.

Taking early bets as to what the Democrats will cook up to try to stop
ACB...”

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
27 Sep 20
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
She’s a woman, so they can’t hire their usual fake sexual assault victims.
Seems there are no male Republicans who haven't been accused of sexual assault. Note Merrick Garland has no such charges, unlike Kavanaugh or Thomas.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55105
Clock
27 Sep 20

@vivify said
Seems there are no male Republicans who haven't been accused of sexual assault. Note Merrick Garland has no such charges, unlike Kavanaugh or Thomas.
but Garland did not have a hearing, where such matters are vetted and explored. That is why there were no ‘such charges”. So your statement is not fact. Maybe he had such an indiscretion, maybe not.

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147754
Clock
27 Sep 20
1 edit

@vivify said
Seems there are no male Republicans who haven't been accused of sexual assault. Note Merrick Garland has no such charges, unlike Kavanaugh or Thomas.
I hear by “accuse” you of sexual assault.

Join the crowd...see how easy it is?

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
27 Sep 20

@mott-the-hoople said
I hear by “accuse” you of sexual assault.

Join the crowd...see how easy it is?
Thomas and Kavanaugh's accusers gave testimony evidence for their claims; so much so that Kavanaugh ended up lying under oath about he knows.

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
27 Sep 20

@averagejoe1 said
but Garland did not have a hearing, where such matters are vetted and explored. That is why there were no ‘such charges”. So your statement is not fact. Maybe he had such an indiscretion, maybe not.
Stephen Breyer, Democrat, had a hearing; no sexual assault charges for him either.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55105
Clock
27 Sep 20

@vivify said
Stephen Breyer, Democrat, had a hearing; no sexual assault charges for him either.
you are ON it!!

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147754
Clock
27 Sep 20

@vivify said
Thomas and Kavanaugh's accusers gave testimony evidence for their claims; so much so that Kavanaugh ended up lying under oath about he knows.
that in untrue

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
27 Sep 20

@mott-the-hoople said

Candace Owens
@RealCandaceO
·
15h
Amy Coney Barrett:

-She’s a woman, so they can’t hire their usual fake sexual assault victims.
-She has two black children, so they can’t smear her as a racist.

Taking early bets as to what the Democrats will cook up to try to stop
ACB...”
I imagine her extremist judicial philosophy (for which she has left an extensive paper trail) and her limited judicial experience will be the main focus.

Kamala Harris will get some nice face time doing what she does best.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
27 Sep 20

@averagejoe1 said
but Garland did not have a hearing, where such matters are vetted and explored. That is why there were no ‘such charges”. So your statement is not fact. Maybe he had such an indiscretion, maybe not.
Garland had a hearing in December 1995 for his appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, a post he was confirmed by a 76-23 vote by a Senate with a Republican majority. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland#:~:text=On%20September%206%2C%201995%2C%20President,longtime%20mentor%20Abner%20J.%20Mikva.&text=Garland's%20confirmation%20vote%20came%20to,Senate%20on%20March%2019%2C%201997.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
55105
Clock
27 Sep 20

@no1marauder said
I imagine her extremist judicial philosophy (for which she has left an extensive paper trail) and her limited judicial experience will be the main focus.

Kamala Harris will get some nice face time doing what she does best.
Good point. And a reasonable point, in that they naturally need to see what kind of a judge she is, that she has what it takes. E g, if they find she ruled in a racist fashion, then by all means do not confirm her. If her paper trail is in line with the tenets of the Constitution, then by all means, confirm her. That is their job. I hope they do it unlike the attempted lynching of Kavanaugh.

Above, someone says Kavanaugh lied under oath, as if that is a fact. If it were a fact, then he would not be confirmed. So the statement above has no business in this thread.

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
Clock
27 Sep 20
1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
but Garland did not have a hearing, where such matters are vetted and explored. That is why there were no ‘such charges”. So your statement is not fact. Maybe he had such an indiscretion, maybe not.
Why didn’t Garland have a hearing in 2016 ?? Hmmm ??

Mott The Hoople
human

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
147754
Clock
27 Sep 20

@mghrn55 said
Why didn’t Garland have a hearing ?? Hmmm ??
because the voters had entrusted that power to the republicans

vivify
rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12456
Clock
27 Sep 20

@mott-the-hoople said
that in untrue
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/brett-kavanaugh-lied-brazenly-repeatedly-under-oath-any-law-student-ncna916031

Brett Kavanaugh lied brazenly and repeatedly under oath.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
27 Sep 20

@mott-the-hoople said
because the voters had entrusted that power to the republicans
Remember those words in 2021.

A Democratic Senate confirmed Reagan's pick Anthony Kennedy in February 1988 by a 97-0 vote.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.