@Mott-The-Hoople saidWhenever you right wingers want to change the subject to irrelevant details about Bill Clinton rather than discuss the moral failings of Donald Trump (which is a few pages ago).
when do we get to the cigar sticking up vags?
@sonhouse saidPersonal attack again, just great. But your attacks are like…..I love popcorn, I am a popcorn propagandist. I think you are a fool for not liking popcorn and that you are mean spirited to keep bashing me for liking popcorn.
I have zero doubt you would acknowledge whatever I send in the way of links, you will just say fake news or some other way to rationalize away any HINT of Corruption by Trump.
I don't make up shyyte like that, she DID pay ONE MILLION dollars to Trump and a month later her son, a felon convicted of Tax fraud, which makes that the first case in US history a POTUS pardoned a f ...[text shortened]... ld EVER think of because your curiosity has been lobotomized when your lips got glued to Trumps ass.
And you keep saying it over and over and over, which I have already said I will always like popcorn, and I was always like the job that Trump is doing. Same thing, so even after this post, you will write and tell everybody and me how much I am a supporter of Donald Trump. We are all sick of it. Get over it. Let me do my popcorn, and maybe you can go get some other movie house treat.
@KingDavid403 saidSo,,, no link.
Please respond to MY posts when pretending too; thank YOU chicken-sht for brains. Nice try liar.
didn't think so liar boy
@sonhouse saidFollow me here.(remember, there are no computers to google on the debate stage in college.)
There is no use EVER talking to you since you lack the curiosity to even google stories we tell like you want US to be your librarian so you can just go FAKE NEWS or YEAH but BIDEN.....
So you are standing before some debate judges, and you say something like Trump is a liar or a rapist. It is expected or stipulated that you would say something that is true, honest and documented. Since those statements are not, you know that you should not be saying them,…. your debate coach will tell you do not say things like that without back up.
So, it follows that since we on the debate stage have to accept what you say, at face value, follow me here, sonhouse, there would be no need for me to google something that you say. It is already true. but the kicker is, that what you say has to be true. Ouch.
In closing, do you follow?
@no1marauder saidNot OK, you sound like gossipy little ladies at a bridge table. Allthe salacious stuff, but note that everything that you and the bridge ladies are saying go hand-in-hand with a man that is having an affair. OFCOURSE they skulk around, lie, maybe use the children as shields, turn off their cell phones to avoid detection… Of course they do all of this. Donald may have done worse. He was having an affair and that is what people that are having affairs do. You seem to be saying that he is worse than a man having an affair. Uhh, a worse affair?? To me, he is a normal affair-participant.
Fine.
It's worse to smuggle your mistress onto a FAMILY vacation with your wife and three young kids (who you're supposed to be spending time with rather than banging your girlfriend) then it is to get a BJ from a willing adult female, though it's wrong to do the latter when you're married. Two of the Donald's kids were 6 and 9 years old when that occurred, though his oldest was a teenager like Chelsea Clinton was when Bill had the affair with Monica Lewinsky.
OK?
@KingDavid403 said "
Because Epstein and Maxwell were still under investigation by the FBI "
Idiot. Epstein is dead, Maxwell is in prison. what FBI investigation was active in Bidens term.
@no1marauder saidlolol 😆
I doubt the Republican Party base would have rejected him no matter what the files said. You and others would probably have been on here claiming it was all fake documents written by Hillary Clinton and Obama.
@AverageJoe1 saidYOU keep insisting on talking about it, not me. But since you insist on my opinion here it is:
Not OK, you sound like gossipy little ladies at a bridge table. Allthe salacious stuff, but note that everything that you and the bridge ladies are saying go hand-in-hand with a man that is having an affair. OFCOURSE they skulk around, lie, maybe use the children as shields, turn off their cell phones to avoid detection… Of course they do all of this. Donald may have don ...[text shortened]... worse than a man having an affair. Uhh, a worse affair?? To me, he is a normal affair-participant.
An affair is immoral. An affair where you involve young kids in it is worse.
Are you seriously suggesting it isn't?
@no1marauder saidoh God, he just does not get it.
Whenever you right wingers want to change the subject to irrelevant details about Bill Clinton rather than discuss the moral failings of Donald Trump (which is a few pages ago).
No one has changed the subject to the details of Clinton.
You have told us how bad Trump is. The subject is Trump. One can hardly mention Trump‘s indiscretions without comparing him to someone else. Clinton was the easiest one to compare him to. One that I can compare him to, when he was NOT president, an entertainer in the UK ,Rolf Harris. You dare not compare our president to that that slime.
Now you see the difference. Thank you very much for your attention. How about another topic? This one is pretty much wrapped up.
@wildgrass saidYou might d a thread on that, which is a diff topic. I probably would not weigh in on that one, but feel free.
Did you have the same opinion when Clinton was impeached for something far more tame?
@no1marauder saidMarauder is correct. Everyone put that in your journals… affairs are immoral, and involvingYoung kids is worse.
YOU keep insisting on talking about it, not me. But since you insist on my opinion here it is:
An affair is immoral. An affair where you involve young kids in it is worse.
Are you seriously suggesting it isn't?
Those are givens, so I don’t really know why he thought he should put it in print . Libs waste a lot of print on the forum.
@AverageJoe1 saidLike I said, your MO is to refuse to engage. What you are doing is NOT engaging in the post it is REFUSAL to ever admit even the slightest hint of corruption by Trump. Engaging means at LEAST defending your would be king.
Personal attack again, just great. But your attacks are like…..I love popcorn, I am a popcorn propagandist. I think you are a fool for not liking popcorn and that you are mean spirited to keep bashing me for liking popcorn.
And you keep saying it over and over and over, which I have already said I will always like popcorn, and I was always like the job that Trump is ...[text shortened]... ck of it. Get over it. Let me do my popcorn, and maybe you can go get some other movie house treat.
You are not even doing that, just BS substituting Popcorn for Trump.
REALLY? This is what you think engaging is?
@AverageJoe1 saidSo now you claim Trump never lies BESIDES the fact you are psychologically incapable of even acknowledging the mere possibility of corruption by Trump, ANY corruption, and you lost the ability you may have had as a child, CURIOSITY, you have ZERO curiosity about Trump corruption because you will NEVER even CONSIDER the idea of Trump corruption much less actually engaging in discussions of corruption under Trump.
Follow me here.(remember, there are no computers to google on the debate stage in college.)
So you are standing before some debate judges, and you say something like Trump is a liar or a rapist. It is expected or stipulated that you would say something that is true, honest and documented. Since those statements are not, you know that you should not be saying them,…. y ...[text shortened]... lready true. but the kicker is, that what you say has to be true. Ouch.
In closing, do you follow?
And now for you he never lies, even though historians show now over 30,000 lies and misrepresentations.
And of course you would deny ALL of that to your dying day.
Your last words just before you die, something like this:
I know my Lord Trump is with me now then kick off.
@sonhouse saidAre you writing to me??!?!? This is really weird, I went back and read that Post of mine that you are referring to in full. About 12 click back. I never mentioned the word lie, but more to the point I have never on the forum stated that he has never told a lie. So you slander and libel me all in one swoop, embarrass me amongst my peers. It is very difficult to dig out of a sunhouse slander. !!!!
So now you claim Trump never lies BESIDES the fact you are psychologically incapable of even acknowledging the mere possibility of corruption by Trump, ANY corruption, and you lost the ability you may have had as a child, CURIOSITY, you have ZERO curiosity about Trump corruption because you will NEVER even CONSIDER the idea of Trump corruption much less actually engaging in ...[text shortened]... words just before you die, something like this:
I know my Lord Trump is with me now then kick off.
@sonhouse saidI’m sorry, you leave a lot of things hanging. What do you mean by hint of the corruption? What is the hint that he was corrupt? Before you answer, remember that you said that Saydis gave Jared $2 billion which is a lie. So just try to say the truth when you say things thank you very much.
Like I said, your MO is to refuse to engage. What you are doing is NOT engaging in the post it is REFUSAL to ever admit even the slightest hint of corruption by Trump. Engaging means at LEAST defending your would be king.
You are not even doing that, just BS substituting Popcorn for Trump.
REALLY? This is what you think engaging is?
And if you mention the Saudis/Jared in your response, I will not even read your response.