@metal-brain saidIf you are secure in your beliefs, why does it bother you that other people condemn you?
I agree, but something keeps bothering me.
Some people are condemned for not vaccinating their children. They are called irresponsible parents putting the lives of their children at risk. What about when it is the other way around?
Jabbing children with the gene vaccine does more harm than good. They are more likely to die from the gene vaccine than covid. Isn't it im ...[text shortened]... Right?
It comes down to this: What is best for the children?
What is the truth about the risks?
@metal-brain saidI don't know (nor do I trust the data source).
What do you think is causing so many young people to die?
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/adults-aged-35-44-died-twice-expected-rate-last-summer-life-insurance-data-suggests
But:
1. we've vaccinated people
2. more people are dying
3. ergo, the vaccines are killing people
doesn't cut it from a scientific argumentation perspective.
Not by a long shot.
@metal-brain saidMeh; jury's still out on whether jabbing children passes the cost/benefit analysis.
Nobody is condemning me.
What is best for the children?
Jabbing them does more harm than good. Shouldn't parents know that?
Leaving it up to the individual is fine.
@sh76 saidSo more people are not dying as the article says? Is that what you are saying?
I don't know (nor do I trust the data source).
But:
1. we've vaccinated people
2. more people are dying
3. ergo, the vaccines are killing people
doesn't cut it from a scientific argumentation perspective.
Not by a long shot.
@metal-brain saidNo; I'm saying I don't know one way or the other and I don't trust that source to confirm a determination.
So more people are not dying as the article says? Is that what you are saying?
@metal-brain saidThis has been explained to you.
Why is the population reducing?
You don’t want to understand.
@shavixmir saidNo. You have not explained it.
This has been explained to you.
You don’t want to understand.
You threw out a guess you do not know is true.
@shavixmir saidHere's what normally happens with a pandemic shag doody, a lot of weak and fragile people get bowled over by it, then as a society comes out of the pandemic the mortality rate goes down because a lot of people on the edge are already gone. They should have died this year but the whatever took them out 2 years earlier.
This has been explained to you.
You don’t want to understand.
They have to create a deadly virus to create a vaccine for it just in case it is accidentally released. Make sense?
https://www.technocracy.news/worlds-deadliest-virus-spanish-flu-reverse-engineered-recreated/
Isn't it a lot easier to not resurrect deadly viruses so vaccines are not needed in the first place? Yes, so what the heck are they doing this for?