There is a 'certain person' on the Forum who is defending all the rights of the truck driver, pulling them out of thin air. Here is the fact, he is not legal. The certain person implies that a CDL makes him all well and good. Jesus. People actually follow this certain person with his platitudes of incorrect largesse. The man is an illegal, who Biden allowed to live here illegally. It is all so obvious, one wonders about the mindset of you liberals.
""'No, simply possessing a Commercial Driver's License (CDL) does not make an individual "legal" in the context of U.S. immigration law;'
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidNo one said it did.
There is a 'certain person' on the Forum who is defending all the rights of the truck driver, pulling them out of thin air. Here is the fact, he is not legal. The certain person implies that a CDL makes him all well and good. Jesus. People actually follow this certain person with his platitudes of incorrect largesse. The man is an illegal, who Biden allowed to live h ...[text shortened]... Driver's License (CDL) does not make an individual "legal" in the context of U.S. immigration law;'
But someone seeking asylum who's case is currently pending before an immigration judge is in the country legally. And it does not matter how they got here:
"Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), [irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1158
You and other right wingers should stop lying about this.
@no1marauder saidAn Illegal Alien: "a foreign national who is living without official authorization in a country of which they are not a citizen."
No one said it did.
But someone seeking asylum who's case is currently pending before an immigration judge is in the country legally. And it does not matter how they got here:
"Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to th ...[text shortened]... /www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1158
You and other right wingers should stop lying about this.
You are trying to be the Artful Wordsmith on the Forum, but Suzianne has you beat. Your comments are ridden with non sequiturs, to quote a phrase.
The slime truck driver is an alien not invited here, who (likely in the black of night to avoid detection) invaded our country, broke through our border with signage that says NoEntry, such as that. If he could not read the english sign, that alone is grounds to deny entry.
The bazterd is living here without said official authorization. You try to use words to justify his being here, but you fail. You think that because your lib officials gave him a CDL that he is no longer illegal?
Tell us that this brother (Sue says he is your brother) is legal. Can't wait.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou're functionally illiterate, aren't you? Did you even finish grade school?
An Illegal Alien: "a foreign national who is living without official authorization in a country of which they are not a citizen."
You are trying to be the Artful Wordsmith on the Forum, but Suzianne has you beat. Your comments are ridden with non sequiturs, to quote a phrase.
The slime truck driver is an alien not invited here, who (likely in the black of ni ...[text shortened]... longer illegal?
Tell us that this brother (Sue says he is your brother) is legal. Can't wait.
The law says he and all asylum seekers are here legally until their claims are adjudicated by the proper authorities. That you are too stupid to get this through your thick head doesn't change that. It doesn't matter how he entered and your parroting of right wing propaganda points doesn't change it either.
@no1marauder saidYou love quoting law. Next you will say Natural Law dictates he is cool.
You're functionally illiterate, aren't you? Did you even finish grade school?
The law says he and all asylum seekers are here legally until their claims are adjudicated by the proper authorities. That you are too stupid to get this through your thick head doesn't change that. It doesn't matter how he entered and your parroting of right wing propaganda points doesn't change it either.
Me, I go the common sense route. A guy breaks into your front yard and kills your 3 children. (breaches your border) The neighbors rush over with axes to chop the bazterd up, and you get a faeirie poster on a stick that says 'This Man Has Rights", or some such.
Well, by golly, everyone takes heed to your poster, lay down their axes, and all sit in a circle while you pontificate god knows what.
Oh, don't forget to mention the 3 children.
You can call me what you want, but you are a bot, plain and simple.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidYes, when someone says someone or something is "illegal", I do love quoting law.
You love quoting law. Next you will say Natural Law dictates he is cool.
Me, I go the common sense route. A guy breaks into your front yard and kills your 3 children. (breaches your border) The neighbors rush over with axes to chop the bazterd up, and you get a faeirie poster on a stick that says 'This Man Has Rights", or some such.
Well, by golly, everyone ta ...[text shortened]... to mention the 3 children.
You can call me what you want, but you are a bot, plain and simple.
Why do you think that is?
Stop pretending you give the tiniest s**t about the victims of this accident; you've already made it clear you and other right wingers are harping on it for political reasons (making Singh a "poster boy" for immigrants) and are even willing to jeopardize his prosecution by making dubious claims.
@AverageJoe1 saidOh… you go by common sense… really?
You love quoting law. Next you will say Natural Law dictates he is cool.
Me, I go the common sense route. A guy breaks into your front yard and kills your 3 children. (breaches your border) The neighbors rush over with axes to chop the bazterd up, and you get a faeirie poster on a stick that says 'This Man Has Rights", or some such.
Well, by golly, everyone ta ...[text shortened]... to mention the 3 children.
You can call me what you want, but you are a bot, plain and simple.
So, there’s law… and your common sense…
Bloody nora… no wonder your country is flushing itself down the toilet of history.
@no1marauder saiddemocrats flooded the system, no one appears in court. you can quit with your false narratives of following the law...democrats have become lawless thinking they can create their own laws. sanctuary cities/states are not constitutional
No one said it did.
But someone seeking asylum who's case is currently pending before an immigration judge is in the country legally. And it does not matter how they got here:
"Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to th ...[text shortened]... /www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1158
You and other right wingers should stop lying about this.
@shavixmir saidanything to keep wearing that dress and panties ehh?
Oh… you go by common sense… really?
So, there’s law… and your common sense…
Bloody nora… no wonder your country is flushing itself down the toilet of history.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidSingh arrived in the US in 2018, promptly applied for asylum and was processed into the system for determining whether that status should be granted. "Democrats" were not in charge of the Executive Branch of the country at that time.
democrats flooded the system, no one appears in court. you can quit with your false narratives of following the law...democrats have become lawless thinking they can create their own laws. sanctuary cities/states are not constitutional
Conservative members of the SCOTUS adopted the "anti-commandeering doctrine" in the 1990s declaring:
"The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers . . . to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policymaking is involved, and no case-by-case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty.12
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-10/anti-commandeering-doctrine
So yes, sanctuary cities/States, which direct local officials not to become an arm of Federal immigration enforcement. are constitutional.
@shavixmir saidThis one says we are toilet poop.
Oh… you go by common sense… really?
So, there’s law… and your common sense…
Bloody nora… no wonder your country is flushing itself down the toilet of history.
I will spare you all the __________________(fill in any wonderment of our country) and let you think about the fantastic Shav. Yeah, he can really get a man thinking. Like Sonhouse does.
@no1marauder saidThis one says we have 'made it clear' that we have political objectives.
Yes, when someone says someone or something is "illegal", I do love quoting law.
Why do you think that is?
Stop pretending you give the tiniest s**t about the victims of this accident; you've already made it clear you and other right wingers are harping on it for political reasons (making Singh a "poster boy" for immigrants) and are even willing to jeopardize his prosecution by making dubious claims.
Hey man, we rugged individual self-relilant independent conservatives HARDLY need any political objectives when up against socialists, except when you try to get our stuff.
Hey aren't you due at the street intersection with your signs, the parade is about to start, where you once again broadcast to normal people what you are all about. We dont care, man.
@AverageJoe1 saidFunny thing for someone who spends much of his waking life on an internet forum to say.
This one says we have 'made it clear' that we have political objectives.
Hey man, we rugged individual self-relilant independent conservatives HARDLY need any political objectives when up against socialists, except when you try to get our stuff.
Hey aren't you due at the street intersection with your signs, the parade is about to start, where you once again broadcast to normal people what you are all about. We dont care, man.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou’re a fvxking imbecile Joe.
This one says we are toilet poop.
I will spare you all the __________________(fill in any wonderment of our country) and let you think about the fantastic Shav. Yeah, he can really get a man thinking. Like Sonhouse does.
Seriously. So far down a rabbit hole of moronity, there’s no longer any possibility of communication.
@shavixmir saidhowso
You’re a fvxking imbecile Joe.
Seriously. So far down a rabbit hole of moronity, there’s no longer any possibility of communication.