Go back
The elephant in the room...

The elephant in the room...

Debates


@averagejoe1 said
I note above that there are FIVE thumbs down on the first post. There are five libs on this thread at the moment! You all have been unmasked!!! Write these guys handles down so you will know who is blasting you.. Frankly, I find it rather pansy.
Thanks for the advice...but quite frankly, I dont give a fuk who blasts me...a liberal blasting me is music to my ears.


@sonhouse said
@Earl-of-Trumps
Clearly you cannot handle the truth. Our IT folks found the exact computers the Ruskies used and there are some 20 Russian agents under indictment and yes we know they won't be convicted because they were under orders to hack from Putin himself.
Putin hates Clinton and that is mainly why he meddled in 2016. He has had a hardon against her for decades.
pissed off about that uranium I guess!


@whodey said
I'm sure that a Congress that has opposed Trump on every issue and is trying to impeach him...........without sending it to the Senate, that is, would tell Trump to go ahead with the mission.

Meanwhile, they had literally a few minutes to act where they could actually get to him.
Grow up the military and intelligence community have known exactly where the guy was at any given time for years. The question is why now?


@whodey said
I'm sure that a Congress that has opposed Trump on every issue and is trying to impeach him...........without sending it to the Senate, that is, would tell Trump to go ahead with the mission.

Meanwhile, they had literally a few minutes to act where they could actually get to him.
Libs won't get the 'few minutes to act' part. Tactics escape them.


@kevcvs57 said
Grow up the military and intelligence community have known exactly where the guy was at any given time for years. The question is why now?
Cause our intelligence, (which is fully known to every lib on this thread, where we conservatives get OUR information) our intelligence dictated we move now, that is why. Also , Probably because they were about to waste a few wonderful young men from Kansas................. That is what I got from MY intel.


@kevcvs57 said
Grow up the military and intelligence community have known exactly where the guy was at any given time for years. The question is why now?
I thought it apparent after the attack on the US embassy


@kevcvs57 said
Grow up the military and intelligence community have known exactly where the guy was at any given time for years. The question is why now?
question should be why did bush and obama allow him to keep killing


@mott-the-hoople said
question should be why did bush and obama allow him to keep killing
He is feeding worms now, so let us get ready for liberal observation! Popcorn at the ready. Which network do you think? I think I will do MSNBC to watch them get tongue-tied!


@whodey said
I thought it apparent after the attack on the US embassy
But that was a response to another assassination why ramp up the level of conflict now?
Is it part of a pattern of the US destabilising the region this could result in a resurgence of Isis in the region, perhaps the destabilisation is strategy?


@averagejoe1 said
Cause our intelligence, (which is fully known to every lib on this thread, where we conservatives get OUR information) our intelligence dictated we move now, that is why. Also , Probably because they were about to waste a few wonderful young men from Kansas................. That is what I got from MY intel.
Where is your evidence that the general was about to attack Kansas?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
pissed off about that uranium I guess!
None of that uranium ever left the US. You know that, right?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@earl-of-trumps said
@mchill
Some of these Congressmen didn't have Mother Russia's help getting elected,


Please please please mchill, tell us the story again. Tell us how the Russians helped somebody get elected.

I dare ya lol
Better than the lies you swallowed about Ukraine.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
well, hold on now, McHill. One simple problem Trump had is that Shchiff is a proven leaker. You will recall Obama took out Osama, who was not as dangerous as Soloyami, without congressional approval. So, in this one sentence, you see two reasons why it was the best decision.....the way Trump handled it.

This congressman cannot, could not, be trusted. Throw us another one.
Schiff is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, fool.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Read up, Deep. It is settled matter that the congress, who was not informed or asked for approval...(How do you think THAT would have gone!! 😆) did not have a requirement that the Donald ask them for approval, or even BE notilfied.

Move along from that.......it is settled.
Ignoring the Constitution AGAIN?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
I note above that there are FIVE thumbs down on the first post. There are five libs on this thread at the moment! You all have been unmasked!!! Write these guys handles down so you will know who is blasting you.. Frankly, I find it rather pansy.
Settle down, snowflake.