rapalla7 .Dr
.posts forum silly just than rather literature of works real were these that Assume
?intermediary an from it swiped ian though even ,ian against claim a prosecute party original that could Or
?place first the in party another from it swiped royal though even
,work his swiped somebody since ,instance this in claim copyright a prosecute royalchicken could ,here lawyers any For
...here situation interesting an is this, Oh
To tell you the truth I don't know. You are correct, I think the person should be credited with the work and I have taken that to heart by posting a link with any copy and pasting I have done since.
I think if someone elses work were published it would be different. When it gets into a discussion forum we are not publishing other peoples works for profit. If a person could be sued for stealing another persons work in discussion we would not be able to even discuss a concept. How would we even talk about a book? And why we like it.
Like I said, I don't know.
Mike
Originally posted by Coletti"Plagiarism is the most sincere form of flattery"
Originally posted by Feivel
[b]Questionable in your eyes but in any event NOT plagerism. What is sad is that a supposedly intelligent human can't understand what [b]stay on topic means. Would you like me to translate that into another language for you?
Feivel[/b]
So as not to cause poor Feivel to have another spluttering conniption due to ...[text shortened]... ng to credit my quotes, feel free to smack me. 🙂 Just because I'm not perfect is no excuse.
[/b]
-MÅ¥HÅRM