Go back
The Hypocrisies of the Lunatical Left

The Hypocrisies of the Lunatical Left

Debates

1 edit

This time, we examine the rise of the banning of trans athletes in girls sports.
------------
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-mississippi-discrimination-gender-identity-tate-reeves-9dfa2829f12e5f7efbb1653aaf468941

Mississippi gov signs bill limiting transgender athletes

JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — Mississippi Republican Gov. Tate Reeves signed a bill Thursday to ban transgender athletes from competing on girls or women’s sports teams.
--- the Associated Press
----------


Now, here is the part I find most hypocritical of the lefty lunies.


Conservative lawmakers are responding to an executive order by Democratic President Joe Biden that bans discrimination based on gender identity in school sports and elsewhere. Biden signed it Jan. 20, the day he took office.


Really, Joe!?!

Every school in the nation has several boys teams and a girls teams for various sports.
If that is not discrimination by gender I'd like to know what is.

Democrats. What the &#^% are they good for? 🤔 😳 🤔

1 edit

Who banned books about evolution in schools in some States? Oh... the lunatic Right...

Who tried to cancel Colin Kaepernick for kneeling... the loonie right...

Who cancelled the Dixie Chicks for oppossing the Iraq war... the loonie right...

Who cancelled Bill Maher’s “Politically Incorrect” after the snow flakery of the loonie right over his non-PC comments?

Who cancels women’s rights, gay rights, black rights, etc.? The loonie right.

Perhaps you should be careful about your glass house.

1 edit


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Maybe he means lunatickle.

That’s a moon based fetish.

1 edit

@earl-of-trumps said
This time, we examine the rise of the banning of trans athletes in girls sports.
------------
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-mississippi-discrimination-gender-identity-tate-reeves-9dfa2829f12e5f7efbb1653aaf468941

Mississippi gov signs bill limiting transgender athletes
[i]
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — Mississippi Republican Gov. Tate Reeves signed a bill T ...[text shortened]... mination by gender I'd like to know what is.

Democrats. What the &#^% are they good for? 🤔 😳 🤔
So are you for or against upholding the constitutional rights of EVERY American?

It seems you are for some people's rights, yet against other people having those same rights.



The post that was quoted here has been removed
Perhaps he’s in the closet?


@shavixmir

I Who banned books about evolution in schools in some States? Oh... the lunatic Right...
II Who tried to cancel Colin Kaepernick for kneeling... the loonie right...
III Who cancelled the Dixie Chicks for oppossing the Iraq war... the loonie right...
IV Who cancelled Bill Maher’s “Politically Incorrect” after the snow flakery of the loonie right over his non-PC comments?
V Who cancels women’s rights, gay rights, black rights, etc.? The loonie right.
VI Perhaps you should be careful about your glass house.
------------------------------------------------

lol What a load of confused liberal kah kah this is.

I. A very sorry case of "whataboutism" and moving goal posts I've ever seen.

II. I don't care who cancelled KK, who cares?? Again, you are evading the issue with clumsy dance steps.

III. Who cares about dixie chicks??? stick to the topic!

IV. Ditto

V. Who "cancelled women's rights"??? What are you smoking???

VI. My own "glass house" does not worry about hypocrisy.

Your counterpoints SUCKED. Why do I even bother with you. you suck too


@Duchess64
Earl of Trumps keeps showing his near illiteracy in English.

'Lunatical' is NOT a word in modern English usage.

--------------

Oh... my.... god.... 😵 😵 😵 😵 😵 😵 😵

The resident brain sturgeon has a firm grasp on the obvious. [one-hand-clapping]
🙄 🙄 🙄 😴 😴 😴

1 edit

@Suzianne
I. So are you for or against upholding the constitutional rights of EVERY American?

II. It seems you are for some people's rights, yet against other people having those same rights.
-----------------------------------------

I. Yes, you never met a fiercer fighter for individual rights, as opposed to group rights. Quiz me this, Suzie. A person is born male sex. Does that person have the right **like everyone else** to play sport on a girl's team?? and are "girl teams" constitutionally legal?? Your volley.

II. Actually I am pointing that very hypocrisy out in liberalology.
Again, a person is born male sex. He goes to join a girls soccer team.
Does such a person have that right, yes or no???

It seems liberals say that only persons in above with certain genders can do this and others (male gender) cannot do this, all while citing the wrongness to the states' deciding who can and cannot do it with a different method of discrimination.

In other words, "Discriminate like ME, not like you, because discrimination is illegal"
Does this make any sense at all?

Liberal hypocrisy.


The post that was quoted here has been removed
I am pointing out complete hypocrisy of the lunatical liberal left.

this is about SAYING discrimination by gender is illegal, and turning right around and DOING IT themselves.

Got the gist of it now, Slo-Mo?? Good.

Now, is it legal or not to keep young men/boys off of so-called girl's soccer teams in schools?


The post that was quoted here has been removed
'I gazed at the lunatical vacuity in his eyes and was convinced that whatever motives drove him, that whatever thoughts he actually had, that whatever his real life experience was, none of it would ever be known by anyone except God.'

James Lee - The Glass Rainbow

1 edit

@earl-of-trumps said
I am pointing out complete hypocrisy of the lunatical liberal left.

this is about SAYING discrimination by gender is illegal, and turning right around and DOING IT themselves.

Got the gist of it now, Slo-Mo?? Good.

Now, is it legal or not to keep young men/boys off of so-called girl's soccer teams in schools?
I think it's fine to let trans-men (women who transitioned to men) or trans-boys play on boys teams, if they make the cut.

I don't support the inverse for obvious physical reasons. I don't think hormone treatments are always, if ever, enough to even the gap between trans-women and women.

But apart from sports, I support trans-girls being allowed in activity that is made for girls, such as joining the Girl Scouts.


@earl-of-trumps said
@Suzianne
I. So are you for or against upholding the constitutional rights of EVERY American?

II. It seems you are for some people's rights, yet against other people having those same rights.
-----------------------------------------

I. Yes, you never met a fiercer fighter for individual rights, as opposed to group rights. Quiz me this, Suzie. A p ...[text shortened]... like you, because discrimination is illegal"
Does this make any sense at all?

Liberal hypocrisy.
Still, you fail to answer my question.

It was as easy as I could make it.

1 edit

@suzianne said
Still, you fail to answer my question.

It was as easy as I could make it.
Suzie, when liberals offer two answers that conflict with one another, that is a measure of hypocrisy.

In my libertarian/freedomist world, the school can do whatever they wish. There is your answer.
But my answer to your question is hardly the point I wish to make.

remember, Suzie, the right of your fist ends at the right of my chin.
a trans female person may **think** they have the right to join the girls team,
but the rights of everyone else are being stomped on.

My whole point in this thread is. the libs want it two different ways for two different sets of "gender identity".
The want the law fully enforced with one gender, and **ignored** in another.

You see?