@sonhouse saidRachel?
@Contenchess
ANY news show can put on drivel every now and then, I've even seen drivel on RACHEL.
Oh...that thing that is Ugly?
I can't tell if it is a man trying to be a woman or a woman trying to be a man.
Freak for sure 🤔
@contenchess saidBeing on parole must be tough, huh ? 😆
Rachel?
Oh...that thing that is Ugly?
I can't tell if it is a man trying to be a woman or a woman trying to be a man.
Freak for sure 🤔
@contenchess saidYou live in a bizarro world of your own making.
Rachel?
Oh...that thing that is Ugly?
I can't tell if it is a man trying to be a woman or a woman trying to be a man.
Freak for sure 🤔
@suzianne saidPeople should not force their opinion about gender on others.
Hey, stupid.
The term cisgender has absolutely nothing to do with sexual preference.
Chromosomes are simple fact not opinion. You can believe you are a guy or girl and others can believe differently. But your chromosomes are what they are without opinion.
@eladar saidI'm probably botching some of the historical details here, but there was a famously effeminate Roman emperor in the 3rd century A.D. who preferred to be called Lady.
People should not force their opinion about gender on others.
Chromosomes are simple fact not opinion. You can believe you are a guy or girl and others can believe differently. But your chromosomes are what they are without opinion.
The word "transgender" is relatively new, but there are biological mechanisms supporting the concept and many many examples of it throughout history. Maybe you're just upset that there's been a society shift towards acceptance and understanding?
@wildgrass saidWhat you believe yourself to be or what you want to be does not change your chromosomes.
I'm probably botching some of the historical details here, but there was a famously effeminate Roman emperor in the 3rd century A.D. who preferred to be called Lady.
The word "transgender" is relatively new, but there are biological mechanisms supporting the concept and many many examples of it throughout history. Maybe you're just upset that there's been a society shift towards acceptance and understanding?
@wildgrass saidAnyone who claims people should not be classified by chromosomes.
Who disagrees with you on that?
1 edit
@eladar saidDoesn't make sense. Birth gender classification is not based on chromosomal karyotyping, its based on anatomical features.
Anyone who claims people should not be classified by chromosomes.
Obviously transgendering does not change chromosomes. No one says that or thinks that. Sheesh, chromosomes weren't discovered until 1882 and yet we still had effeminate males who wanted to be called "Lady".
I know you don't like them. That's ok. But they exist, and have always existed. Nothing's changed but the nomenclature and a culture of acceptance.
@wildgrass saidBirth gender classification is based on assumed chromosomes.
Doesn't make sense. Birth gender classification is not based on chromosomal karyotyping, its based on anatomical features.
Obviously transgendering does not change chromosomes. No one says that or thinks that. Sheesh, chromosomes weren't discovered until 1882 and yet we still had effeminate males who wanted to be called "Lady".
I know you don't like them. That's ok. B ...[text shortened]... exist, and have always existed. Nothing's changed but the nomenclature and a culture of acceptance.
Born with a penis xy. Male
No penis xx. Female
@Contenchess
A Rhodes scholar, yep what a FREAK. She has more intelligence and education than ALL of your ultrarightwingnutjobs here put together.