https://pjmedia.com/trending/swedish-prof-urges-eating-human-flesh-to-save-the-climate/
Now Left wing academia types want people to start eating human beings to save the planet and fight climate change?
Be honest, is anyone really surprised here? After all, now they are taking viable infants and slit their throats, so why not eat them?
It's like my pappy always used to say, if you are going to shoot it at least eat it.
But if you are a Lefty, you have to at least be honest with yourself because you are an atheist and really don't believe mankind is set apart from the animal kingdom as "special". You really do believe we should be able to do to humans what is done to animals, which is lock them up in zoos, treat them as beasts of burden, and kill them and eat them at our whim.
Inalienable rights? Pfft! Try inalienable government power.
06 Sep 19
@whodey saidPlease research the potential health problems which arise from human cannibalism before you continue your rant . It is not good for humans to engage in cannibalism
https://pjmedia.com/trending/swedish-prof-urges-eating-human-flesh-to-save-the-climate/
Now Left wing academia types want people to start eating human beings to save the planet and fight climate change?
Be honest, is anyone really surprised here? After all, now they are taking viable infants and slitting their throats, so why not eat them?
It's like my pappy always u ...[text shortened]... ill them and eat them at our whim.
Inalienable rights? Pfft! Try inalienable government power.
06 Sep 19
@caissad4 saidAre you saying that a college professor is anti-science?
Please research the potential health problems which arise from human cannibalism before you continue your rant . It is not good for humans to engage in cannibalism
Then again, what is more important, saving the planet or yourself?
Why not join the Left wing voluntary human extinction group?
http://vhemt.org/
But outside of those concerns, you are good with eating people, right?
06 Sep 19
@whodey saidWhat and end up catching mad cow disease from some right wing nut job, no thanks whodey your giblets are safe with us.
Are you saying that a college professor is anti-science?
Then again, what is more important, saving the planet or yourself?
Why not join the Left wing voluntary human extinction group?
http://vhemt.org/
But outside of those concerns, you are good with eating people, right?
06 Sep 19
@whodey said“But if you are a Lefty, you have to at least be honest with yourself because you are an atheist and really don't believe mankind is set apart from the animal kingdom as "special". You really do believe we should be able to do to humans what is done to animals, which is lock them up in zoos, treat them as beasts of burden, and kill them and eat them at our whim. ”
https://pjmedia.com/trending/swedish-prof-urges-eating-human-flesh-to-save-the-climate/
Now Left wing academia types want people to start eating human beings to save the planet and fight climate change?
Be honest, is anyone really surprised here? After all, now they are taking viable infants and slit their throats, so why not eat them?
It's like my pappy always used ...[text shortened]... ill them and eat them at our whim.
Inalienable rights? Pfft! Try inalienable government power.
Perhaps humans should be treating animals better, we don’t have descend to the lowest common denominator, I know you’d like to, but we don’t have to.
06 Sep 19
@kevcvs57 saidIn terms of morality, I think we can both agree that human beings as a race sink to the lowest common denominator.
“But if you are a Lefty, you have to at least be honest with yourself because you are an atheist and really don't believe mankind is set apart from the animal kingdom as "special". You really do believe we should be able to do to humans what is done to animals, which is lock them up in zoos, treat them as beasts of burden, and kill them and eat them at our whim. ”
Perhaps ...[text shortened]... we don’t have descend to the lowest common denominator, I know you’d like to, but we don’t have to.
That is the conundrum. The spiral down continues.
06 Sep 19
it's hilarious how he finds an insane idiot, who said an insane idiotic thing, labels him as "the left" because reasons and then comes here and vomits a thread like this.
it's even funnier that you all keep engaging him as if what he said is just a slightly flawed viewpoint (instead of insane and idiotic) worth debating.
06 Sep 19
@zahlanzi saidSo why is eating human flesh wrong in your opinion? On what moral grounds?
it's hilarious how he finds an insane idiot, who said an insane idiotic thing, labels him as "the left" because reasons and then comes here and vomits a thread like this.
it's even funnier that you all keep engaging him as if what he said is just a slightly flawed viewpoint (instead of insane and idiotic) worth debating.
06 Sep 19
@whodey saidi am not going to engage you troll 😀
So why is eating human flesh wrong in your opinion? On what moral grounds?
This isn't about you, dear. Right now, you're one of this forum's hazards. Like a toxic dump. You can't be fixed, you can't be reasoned with, only avoided. My problem is that some people, who can in fact be reasoned with, keep going for dips into the toxic pool that is you.
I am trying to reason with them.
06 Sep 19
@zahlanzi saidIt passes the day and whilst the source maybe insane and or idiotic it’s not a million miles from the type of debate you might have on a course discussing utilitarian philosophy. I mean, we are animals and we do eat animals. I’m not advocating eating people but is burying or burning the environmentally expensive protein found in humans totally sane and logical?
it's hilarious how he finds an insane idiot, who said an insane idiotic thing, labels him as "the left" because reasons and then comes here and vomits a thread like this.
it's even funnier that you all keep engaging him as if what he said is just a slightly flawed viewpoint (instead of insane and idiotic) worth debating.
P.s I realise it’s a got a clumsy anti choice - anti left origin but maybe theres a tangential debate there.
06 Sep 19
@kevcvs57 saidi can understand that but surely you can pass the day with sh or marauder instead of this BDSM activity that is talking with whodey.
It passes the day and whilst the source maybe insane and or idiotic it’s not a million miles from the type of debate you might have on a course discussing utilitarian philosophy. I mean, we are animals and we do eat animals. I’m not advocating eating people but is burying or burning the environmentally expensive protein found in humans totally sane and logical?
P.s I realise it’s a got a clumsy anti choice - anti left origin but maybe theres a tangential debate there.
And if, through some insane miracle, we all agree to ignore whodey comments and threads, along mott, averagejoe, patzwhatshisname and others, wouldn't what remains be some rather decent time passing activities?
" I mean, we are animals and we do eat animals"
then make a thread discussing cannibalism, pros and cons, instead of humoring this troll and his framing that "the left now advocates canibalism, omg, the left is crazy, we are all going to die"
06 Sep 19
@whodey saidIt’s illegal.
So why is eating human flesh wrong in your opinion? On what moral grounds?
I’ve heard that eating human organ meat could be unhealthy.
As for morality.
If I’m stranded on a boat with you, and we’ve not eaten for hours... you are getting BBQ’d.
Sorry Divegeester... I know you don’t like me wishing someone dead, but if it’s a choice between starvation or eating right-wingers... death is on the menu.
06 Sep 19
@shavixmir saidRaw, medium, or well done?
It’s illegal.
I’ve heard that eating human organ meat could be unhealthy.
As for morality.
If I’m stranded on a boat with you, and we’ve not eaten for hours... you are getting BBQ’d.
Sorry Divegeester... I know you don’t like me wishing someone dead, but if it’s a choice between starvation or eating right-wingers... death is on the menu.
06 Sep 19
@zahlanzi saidWell we can't all start serious threads like Trump being a Russian transvestite Hitler like you Z.
it's hilarious how he finds an insane idiot, who said an insane idiotic thing, labels him as "the left" because reasons and then comes here and vomits a thread like this.
it's even funnier that you all keep engaging him as if what he said is just a slightly flawed viewpoint (instead of insane and idiotic) worth debating.