The New Case Against Immigration

Unless we curb present levels of mass immigration, Americans are likely to live in a more conflict-ridden, less cooperative, less advanced, more unequal, higher-taxed, and more government-heavy society, says author Mark Krikorian, in his new book, "The New Case Against Immigration: Both Legal and Illegal." Debate:

http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=ZjZhN2MyNzU4MzVjYmFlNjY2ZDc3NjdjMTRlNjAxYzA

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Unless we curb present levels of mass immigration, Americans are likely to live in a more conflict-ridden, less cooperative, less advanced, more unequal, higher-taxed, and more government-heavy society, says author Mark Krikorian, in his new book, "The New Case Against Immigration: Both Legal and Illegal." Debate:

http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=ZjZhN2MyNzU4MzVjYmFlNjY2ZDc3NjdjMTRlNjAxYzA

Originally posted by Scheel
However here at a site that is twice as authoritative on this issue both Wulff and Morgenthaller provides a deep analysis that contradicts Krikorian on every major point of the analysis.
http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/default.aspx

I will not summarize the content, because I think it's far better to post random links without even reading the article they point to.

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Unless we curb present levels of mass immigration, Americans are likely to live in a more conflict-ridden, less cooperative, less advanced, more unequal, higher-taxed, and more government-heavy society, says author Mark Krikorian, in his new book, "The New Case Against Immigration: Both Legal and Illegal." Debate:

http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=ZjZhN2MyNzU4MzVjYmFlNjY2ZDc3NjdjMTRlNjAxYzA

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
I'm very interested in the issue of immigration. Please provide the link.

Originally posted by shavixmir
Instead of making a statement and posting a link.
Explain to us, in your own words, what the writer's reasoning is.

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
The main point the author makes -- and it's a good one -- is that mass immigration increases economic inequality.

Originally posted by CliffLandin
However, immigration has really been curtailed by the economic situation in the U.S. right now. Is this part of Bush's secret plan?

Dubya isn't intelligent enough to create a scheme like that.

Originally posted by jlilly
Dubya isn't intelligent enough to create a scheme like that.

Dems want the illegals to increase the number of people who will vote for them. Rich Reps want illegal immigrants because they are cheap labor.

Both sides have reasons to look the other way when it comes to illegal immigration.

Originally posted by Eladar
Dems want the illegals to increase the number of people who will vote for them. Rich Reps want illegal immigrants because they are cheap labor.

Both sides have reasons to look the other way when it comes to illegal immigration.

Dems only care about getting elected.

Rich Reps only care about how much money their businesses are making.

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Unless we curb present levels of mass immigration, Americans are likely to live in a more conflict-ridden, less cooperative, less advanced, more unequal, higher-taxed, and more government-heavy society, says author Mark Krikorian, in his new book, "The New Case Against Immigration: Both Legal and Illegal." Debate:

http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=ZjZhN2MyNzU4MzVjYmFlNjY2ZDc3NjdjMTRlNjAxYzA

Originally posted by spruce112358
The only people interested in increased immigration are Republican businessmen who want to create competition so they can lower the wages they pay to laborers whose jobs, for one reason or another, they cannot move to China. If they can lower labor costs, they raise their profits.

Democrats want to provide benefits for those already here -- but have ...[text shortened]... n want us to vote Republican?!?!? If you are against immigration, you should be voting Democrat.