Go back
The New Yorker Endorses Obama

The New Yorker Endorses Obama

Debates


http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/10/29/121029taco_talk_editors?mobify=0

"The choice is clear. The Romney-Ryan ticket represents a constricted and backward-looking vision of America: the privatization of the public good."

"The reëlection of Barack Obama is a matter of great urgency. Not only are we in broad agreement with his policy directions; we also see in him what is absent in Mitt Romney—a first-rate political temperament and a deep sense of fairness and integrity."

"A two-term Obama Administration will leave an enduringly positive imprint on political life. It will bolster the ideal of good governance and a social vision that tempers individualism with a concern for community. Every Presidential election involves a contest over the idea of America. Obama’s America—one that progresses, however falteringly, toward social justice, tolerance, and equality—represents the future that this country deserves."


Originally posted by vivify
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/10/29/121029taco_talk_editors?mobify=0

"The choice is clear. The Romney-Ryan ticket represents a constricted and backward-looking vision of America: the privatization of the public good."

"The reëlection of Barack Obama is a matter of great urgency. Not only are we in broad agreement with his policy directions; ...[text shortened]... social justice, tolerance, and equality—represents the future that this country deserves."
The only true part of that is that the choice is clear.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by vivify
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/10/29/121029taco_talk_editors?mobify=0

"The choice is clear. The Romney-Ryan ticket represents a constricted and backward-looking vision of America: the privatization of the public good."

"The reëlection of Barack Obama is a matter of great urgency. Not only are we in broad agreement with his policy directions; ...[text shortened]... social justice, tolerance, and equality—represents the future that this country deserves."
I think it's a great editorial, but was the endorsement ever in question?


Originally posted by vivify

"A two-term Obama Administration will leave an enduringly positive imprint on political life. It will bolster the ideal of good governance and a social vision that tempers individualism with a concern for community.
What were they smoking to come up with this?

Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm shocked, I say, shocked(!) that the New Yorker endorsed the Democratic candidate for elected office.


The choice is clear:

Which would you prefer to eat, shards of glass or razors? It's your choice, you get a choice. After you choose obviously you'll get what you deserve.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I guess maybe it's a little bit of a surprise that they didn't endorse Jill Stein.


Originally posted by vivify
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/10/29/121029taco_talk_editors?mobify=0

"The choice is clear. The Romney-Ryan ticket represents a constricted and backward-looking vision of America: the privatization of the public good."

"The reëlection of Barack Obama is a matter of great urgency. Not only are we in broad agreement with his policy directions; ...[text shortened]... social justice, tolerance, and equality—represents the future that this country deserves."
Was this article right after the one about the sky being blue? Perhaps it was right before the article proclaiming "Everybody Poops",

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.