Originally posted by GreatSantiniI don't discredit them... I don't read Swedish.
The sources are from Swedish newspapers, are you discounting them because they are repeated on Amren?
Second, those are sensationalist Swedish newspapers.
Third, even AmRen says "the media keeps the correctness but
everybody knows what they are talking about". It is a generalization.
Fourth, it is easy to gather 5 notes and say it is a trend. I wonder what
the other 10 or 20 Swedish newspapers say about it.
Fifth, using AmRen weakens your argument, which is what I am saying.
Don't get me wrong... I dislike immigrants (of ANY background) who
ungratefully don't adapt to the place that opens its arms to them
(whichever it is)... I just think it does not help your argument to use
a very discredited source with such a stinky bias as racism.
1 edit
Originally posted by SeitseYour points are well taken, so I did a key word search using MALMO SWEDEN CRIME.
I don't discredit them... I don't read Swedish.
Second, those are sensationalist Swedish newspapers.
Third, even AmRen says "the media keeps the correctness but
everybody knows what they are talking about". It is a generalization.
Fourth, it is easy to gather 5 notes and say it is a trend. I wonder what
the other 10 or 20 Swedish newspapers say a ot help your argument to use
a very discredited source with such a stinky bias as racism.
Choose any major news source you want, things are not going well in Malmo, where unlimited immigration policies have resulted in 25% of the population being muslim and increasing all the time. It will not be a Swedish city in ten more years. Their way of life will be changed forever, and it will never be retrieved.
1 edit
Originally posted by GreatSantiniGiven the declining Swedish birth rate, it would disappear in any case.
Choose any major news source you want, things are not going well in Malmo, where unlimited immigration policies have resulted in 25% of the population being muslim and increasing all the time. It will not be a Swedish city in ten more years. Their way of life will be changed forever, and it will never be retrieved.
Here's an article with a different spin, citing the positive demography of immigration: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5348622.stm
"While the load of its ageing population is weighing down Sweden, our city has a young population that is in itself an investment in future welfare," says the mayor of Malmo.
Typically, though, the article glosses over the most sinister aspect of immigration to Malmo--the increasing concentration of Danes...
Originally posted by Bosse de NageThat article is interesting in that it sounds very positive indeed, reread it carefully. It gives absolutely no examples of any benefits achieved, only problems that have resulted. It is a masterpiece of politically correct thinking.
Given the declining Swedish birth rate, it would disappear in any case.
Here's an article with a different spin, citing the positive demography of immigration: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5348622.stm
"While the load of its ageing population is weighing down Sweden, our city has a young population that is in itself an investment in fut ...[text shortened]... er the most sinister aspect of immigration to Malmo--the increasing concentration of Danes...
Originally posted by Bosse de NageIt makes you wonder why these two issues are so muddled. Multiculturality and immigration may be connected but are fundamentally two different issues.
Given the declining Swedish birth rate, it would disappear in any case.
Here's an article with a different spin, citing the positive demography of immigration: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5348622.stm
"While the load of its ageing population is weighing down Sweden, our city has a young population that is in itself an investment in fut ...[text shortened]... er the most sinister aspect of immigration to Malmo--the increasing concentration of Danes...
That a country restricts immigration doesn't have to mean it is not multicultural. I think that the capacity to absorb immigrants properly should be distinguished from how immigrants are received and treated (or not). One is a matter for economic considerations, the other is a simple matter of respect for the other. Why so many defend a control of immigration that passes through disrespect for the other is beyond me. It's neither efficient nor correct.
Originally posted by GreatSantini25% is a serious uh-oh. That's sufficient percentage for continual low-intensity Jihad.
Your points are well taken, so I did a key word search using MALMO SWEDEN CRIME.
Choose any major news source you want, things are not going well in Malmo, where unlimited immigration policies have resulted in 25% of the population being muslim and increasing all the time. It will not be a Swedish city in ten more years. Their way of life will be changed forever, and it will never be retrieved.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterGreat article, Mr. Ritter, but I'm afraid it's going to come under heavy criticism here, with many headaches to follow if you try to argue intelligently about it.
The New Demographic Balance in Europe and its Consequences:
http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=379&PID=0&IID=1509&TTL=The_New_Demographic_Balance_in_Europe_and_its_Consequences
Originally posted by SpastiGovHuman infertility.
Ok, since the early seventies we've been told to worry about an impending Ice Age, nuclear winter, the Jupiter Effect, the China Syndrome, acid rain, the Doomsday Asteroid, the greenhouse effect, African killer bees, ozone depletion, Y2K, SARS, anthrax, global warming again, climate change and bird flu. Oh and an obesity epidemic.
Seems to be the end is ...[text shortened]...
Care to make a prediction on the next hobgoblin, once everyone is bored with global warming?