16 Oct '10 12:17>
The rich are the mechanism that ensures strong competition in the free market.
I realize this is point so many socialists on RHP simply don't get -- I guess no one has ever explained it properly. It is important not to tax the rich disproportionately because of a number of facts:
- competition is necessary to force efficient use of resources under a free market -- best quality goods/services at lowest cost
- established companies HATE competition with a passion and will do anything legal to get rid of it
- government regulations often play into the hands of companies who are trying to restrict competition by creating a barrier to entry
- government anti-trust legislation is poor at ensuring competition because it is slow and cumbersome
So what is the most efficient way of ensuring that monopolies don't occur? Simple -- make sure there are rich people. Rich people are constantly looking for investment opportunities -- sniffing out uncompetitive, lazy firms that are charging high prices for bad service and starting competing firms is like a game for them. They love it -- and they do it for free, unlike the government which one has to pay (and who would do the job badly anyway due to lack of incentive).
On the other hand, taxing the rich very heavily (like no1marauder and others want to do) means that the rich won't perform their "natural" function anymore. That results in companies facing less competition -- which means that they can charge higher prices and pay worse wages. What could be worse for "the workers" than that?
So taxing the rich is far from the freebie socialists want to make out. The inevitable result will be less competition -- which will come around and bite the working class hard -- and which the government will be effectively powerless to prevent.
I realize this is point so many socialists on RHP simply don't get -- I guess no one has ever explained it properly. It is important not to tax the rich disproportionately because of a number of facts:
- competition is necessary to force efficient use of resources under a free market -- best quality goods/services at lowest cost
- established companies HATE competition with a passion and will do anything legal to get rid of it
- government regulations often play into the hands of companies who are trying to restrict competition by creating a barrier to entry
- government anti-trust legislation is poor at ensuring competition because it is slow and cumbersome
So what is the most efficient way of ensuring that monopolies don't occur? Simple -- make sure there are rich people. Rich people are constantly looking for investment opportunities -- sniffing out uncompetitive, lazy firms that are charging high prices for bad service and starting competing firms is like a game for them. They love it -- and they do it for free, unlike the government which one has to pay (and who would do the job badly anyway due to lack of incentive).
On the other hand, taxing the rich very heavily (like no1marauder and others want to do) means that the rich won't perform their "natural" function anymore. That results in companies facing less competition -- which means that they can charge higher prices and pay worse wages. What could be worse for "the workers" than that?
So taxing the rich is far from the freebie socialists want to make out. The inevitable result will be less competition -- which will come around and bite the working class hard -- and which the government will be effectively powerless to prevent.