22 Jan 05
Originally posted by StarValleyWyIt's better than the majority of the regurgitated, drunken,
I should have known. You have no ideas of your own?
stream-of-consciousness things that you consider your own 'ideas.'
If you have an objection to the content of the site quoted, state
them. If you have only insults directed that the person providing
the information, then shut up.
Nemesio
23 Jan 05
1 edit
Originally posted by NemesioI have to disagree. StarValleyWy's posts are often incomprehensible or illogical or totally irrellevant to the topic at hand, but at least they are his own material. This is very important. Posting a link with no comments is pretty sad.
It's better than the majority of the regurgitated, drunken,
stream-of-consciousness things that you consider your own 'ideas.'
If you have an objection to the content of the site quoted, state
them. If you have only insults direct ...[text shortened]... at the person providing
the information, then shut up.
Nemesio
23 Jan 05
1 edit
Originally posted by STANGMy thought is that posting a link with no comment is pretty sad.
What's your thoughts on this then ?
HTTP://rhp-ratings.blogspot.com
EDIT - If that's one of your 'trick graphs' that has an anti-Bush message in it, it's irritating the way you try to trick people. I guess you're trying to irritate people. It can be funny.
23 Jan 05
Originally posted by AThousandYoungI don't want to iritate people. It needs exposure.
My thought is that posting a link with no comment is pretty sad.
EDIT - If that's one of your 'trick graphs' that has an anti-Bush message in it, it's irritating the way you try to trick people. I guess you're trying to irritate people. It can be funny.