01 Nov 04
Here's an example of why people need to consider the longer term consequences of their country's actions and why it is necessary for a major overhaul of foreign policy. At this turning point, which presidential candidate is better for the longer term viability of the world ?
Those for suicide bombing in defence of Islam ...
Indonesia 27%
Pakistan 33%
Jordon 43%
Nigeria 47%
Lebanon 73%
This example also shows that there's more to be done than eliminating small fanatical groups.
(Sources: http://people-press.org/ and http://www.victorynewsmagazine.com/AmericaInEyesOfTheWorld.htm)
01 Nov 04
Originally posted by STANGWhat does "in defense of Islam" mean here? "To prevent Islam from being eliminated"? "To prevent the US from imposing its imperial will?" "As a means of decreasing the proportion of freethinkers around the globe?"
Here's an example of why people need to consider the longer term consequences of their country's actions and why it is necessary for a major overhaul of foreign policy. At this turning point, which presidential candidate is better for the longer term viability of the world ?
Those for suicide bombing in defence of Islam ...
Indonesia 27%
Pakistan 33% ...[text shortened]... es: http://people-press.org/ and http://www.victorynewsmagazine.com/AmericaInEyesOfTheWorld.htm)
The wording of the question may decisively moderate the proportion of people endorsing it.