23 Oct 20
@suzianne saidWhat’s next? That is obvious. The government will form a committee to decide how much longer after the actual birth a woman will still be able to end the life of the child.....I think probably just another nine months what do you think. Do you not think rhis would be the next step to consider?Remember progressivism is the rule of the day, and that would be the natural next progressive movement
"... and one giant leap for mankind."
Backwards, that is.
What's next? Disallowing women the vote?
24 Oct 20
@averagejoe1 saidClearly you don't understand. I'm talking about what is next in the Republican agenda. Killing children is already against the law. Of course detaining them without habeas corpus is not, as Republicans know.
What’s next? That is obvious. The government will form a committee to decide how much longer after the actual birth a woman will still be able to end the life of the child.....I think probably just another nine months what do you think. Do you not think rhis would be the next step to consider?Remember progressivism is the rule of the day, and that would be the natural next progressive movement
No, I was asking, as you'd know had you read my post, as to what is next on the Republican agenda of making women into second- or third-class citizens again. Care to answer?
24 Oct 20
@cheesemaster saidWhat have you got against civilization?
Good idea 🤔
I notice you have a big mouth when talking about rights, but you are conspicuously silent about the rights of women.
@Duchess64
I have no doubt republicans would kill the right for women to vote if they could get away with it.
They only want rich white men voting thinking they would automatically vote republican.