We should protect its "potential life" by insuring it will spread as far as possible without the government "murdering" it by imposing mandatory social distancing measures. Nor should individual's right to personal bodily sovereignty allow them to "kill" it by using hand sanitizer or other means; they accepted the risk that the virus would exist on their body by going out and thus have no moral justification to end its existence.
4 edits
@no1marauder saidSo you are finally beginning to see the light. The virus is essential to humanities existence, health, and well being. The natural world is the great equalizer. Its time we accept its role in the circle of life.
We should protect its "potential life" by insuring it will spread as far as possible without the government "murdering" it by imposing mandatory social distancing measures. Nor should individual's right to personal bodily sovereignty allow them to "kill" it by using hand sanitizer or other means; they accepted the risk that the virus would exist on their body by going out and thus have no moral justification to end its existence.
Nature knows best...scientists....have much to learn from it.
@joe-shmo saidI know; Jonas Salk should have been executed for his crimes against nature rather than being treated as some sort of "hero".
So you are finally beginning to see the light. The virus is essential to humanities existence, health, and well being. The natural world is the great equalizer. Its time we accept its role in the circle of life.
Nature knows best...scientists....have much to learn from it.
@no1marauder saidYeah...
I know; Jonas Salk should have been executed for his crimes against nature rather than being treated as some sort of "hero".
And by the same token a virus that indiscriminately kills people should be summarily executed for its crimes against humanity.
nothing deserves to live 😡
Mua ha ha ha ha ha haaaa!
@no1marauder saidWhat if the unborn self identify as a virus?
We should protect its "potential life" by insuring it will spread as far as possible without the government "murdering" it by imposing mandatory social distancing measures. Nor should individual's right to personal bodily sovereignty allow them to "kill" it by using hand sanitizer or other means; they accepted the risk that the virus would exist on their body by going out and thus have no moral justification to end its existence.
Can we spare them then?
1 edit
@lemon-lime saidWell, I reckon if the government says that tax payer funded abortion OK then it must be OK
NO!
[youtube]Xzx3-hKl__8[/youtube]