15 Aug 06
I'm talking about the Hollywood film about to be released. There has been considerable debate already about whether or not it is "too soon" for such a film to have been made. I would be interested to hear what the general consenus on the matter is, especially from all the Americans on this site.
B.
15 Aug 06
Originally posted by BromageUntil we have *any* evidence about what happened on 9/11, and even after that, it is imho abslolutelly INMORAL to make a movie about the theme (and also after that it will be at least VERY cuestionable....)
I'm talking about the Hollywood film about to be released. There has been considerable debate already about whether or not it is "too soon" for such a film to have been made. I would be interested to hear what the general consenus on the matter is, especially from all the Americans on this site.
B.
Oh my, that putrid film makers are going crazy to make a buck from the suffering of other people...
BTW, in this matter is never "too soon" (or too late for the case)
It is simple a matter of putting an aberration to try to make a "show" of the sick spectatiors, from all us. me included, to see more and more blood spare.
Imho they are speculating with the low instincts that sads the "human" specie.
Somethig to completely erase from my agenda.
- J
15 Aug 06
Originally posted by CrazyLilTingI knew this would happen the day the terrorist attack occurred. I had started makign a trailer in my head.
Until we have *any* evidence about what happened on 9/11, and even after that, it is imho abslolutelly INMORAL to make a movie about the theme (and also after that it will be at least VERY cuestionable....)
Oh my, that putrid film makers are going crazy to make a buck from the suffering of other people...
BTW, in this matter is never "too soon" (or t ...[text shortened]... ncts that sads the "human" specie.
Somethig to completely erase from my agenda.
- J
"Ben Affleck, Matt Damon as star crossed lovers in each of the towers as they fell. Can they make it?"
15 Aug 06
Originally posted by Derfel Cadarn90% of the movie will be about the lives of Mohammad Atta and his ilk and the injustices thery suffered to drive them to do such a heinous terrorist act. I just hope they don't leave out the fact that Atta visited a nude-bar and drank booze a few days before the incident. Maybe he got 72 randy, virgin men as his reward....🙄
I knew this would happen the day the terrorist attack occurred. I had started makign a trailer in my head.
"Ben Affleck, Matt Damon as star crossed lovers in each of the towers as they fell. Can they make it?"
15 Aug 06
Originally posted by chancremechanicHe got an airplane engine through the head.
90% of the movie will be about the lives of Mohammad Atta and his ilk and the injustices thery suffered to drive them to do such a heinous terrorist act. I just hope they don't leave out the fact that Atta visited a nude-bar and drank booze a few days before the incident. Maybe he got 72 randy, virgin men as his reward....🙄
15 Aug 06
Originally posted by CrazyLilTingi think its just a movie, you watch it or you dont, nothing wrong with it really. if this movie is wrong then so was pearl harbour and the passion of the christ etc. but i watched them both so ill watch this one too.
Until we have *any* evidence about what happened on 9/11, and even after that, it is imho abslolutelly INMORAL to make a movie about the theme (and also after that it will be at least VERY cuestionable....)
Oh my, that putrid film makers are going crazy to make a buck from the suffering of other people...
BTW, in this matter is never "too soon" (or t ...[text shortened]... ncts that sads the "human" specie.
Somethig to completely erase from my agenda.
- J
15 Aug 06
1 edit
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomThat's right, but what happens with the people that can't discern what is true and what is fiction?
i think its just a movie, you watch it or you dont, nothing wrong with it really. if this movie is wrong then so was pearl harbour and the passion of the christ etc. but i watched them both so ill watch this one too.
huh?
- J
15 Aug 06
1 edit
Originally posted by CrazyLilTingthey are the lucky ones!
That's right, but what happens with the people that can't discern what is true and what is fiction?
huh?
- J
they can continue their investigations into current affairs here: http://www.ruthannzaroff.com/wonderland/
they are the lucky ones!
15 Aug 06
1 edit
Originally posted by NZDrifterI wonder, was the US involved with the first attempted plot to blow up the world trade towers? Was the US involved in the plot to blow up the planes leaving England? It seems the US is only involved in terrorists acts that are successful, no?
Here's an interesing video that advocates U.S goverment involvment in the incident.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4WOXh8hbkI
16 Aug 06
2 edits
Originally posted by whodeyNo response to my last post? Seriously, why no conspiracy theories about the original bombings of the World Trade Centers in the early 1990's. This would make Clinton part of the Bush conspiracy, no?
I wonder, was the US involved with the first attempted plot to blow up the world trade towers? Was the US involved in the plot to blow up the planes leaving England? It seems the US is only involved in terrorists acts that are successful, no?
